BALONEY......really..... The QUESTION is..... How do you separate the wheat from the chaff? DUH.....One must, obviously, resort to original sources, and verify, Verify....VERIFY....... You know this is true. However, merely for the purpose of "argument and debate", you pretend that you do not know. Maybe you are bored, and you are just taking a position....which you do not really agree with....for the "heck of it"......? Are you sure that you did not attend Penn? I thought you stated that you had. And, recently, you have stated that you never did. Anyway.....I do recall that someone mentioned this, during the past two years....and I though it was you. So, feel free to trust EVERYTHING you read coughed up by an AI...... OR....of course..... You will need to spend a great deal of time to separate out what is true from that which is false. This will take a great deal of time. FORTUNATELY....as you DO know, and as I DO know..... A genius who already knows the answers, and the truth, can profitably use AI to jog one's memory about that which one has already researched....in the distant past.... And one does not NEED to waste much time deciding when AI goes off-tracke. THIS is why, in order to use an AI, in a constructive way.....one must STILL be a ..... Genius, and know more than the AI, about any topic being analysed by the AI.
