Jump to content

Ready for change? Labour unveils 'radical' manifesto


webfact

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

I have no more of an idea of the motivations of those Jews who criticise him than I do those who defend him, but I am reasonably confident that a significant number of non-Jews who criticise him and the Labour party are not doing so because they are particularly concerned about anti-Semitism or about human rights in general. 

I'm sure it's pretty obvious why some Jews critisize him, whilst some Jews may like some of Labours manifesto (getting back on topic) I'm pretty sure they are not defending Corbyn as such.

 

Do you think that Corbyn as being leader of the Labour Party could do more to rid the party of antisemitism, sometimes I wonder if Corbyn actually knows what antisemitism is.

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, steve187 said:

too many students getting worthless in the real world degrees.

the spongers and i can not be bothered to work types, wanting everything handed to them on a plate, 

the NHS will get better when all the never had any health care before EU citizens have stopped arriving, 

 the minimum wages is what it is, if you take a job at minimum wage then you know what you are getting, Austerity needed to be done, who ever was in, 

I hope you’re missive above isn’t evidence of any claim to be better than those you criticize.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

It is the very front of these guys' website - a photo of JC.

https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/

 

An interesting article linked on the front page:

As a British Jew I’m not fearful of a Corbyn government but I’m horrified at how antisemitism is being used against him

by Robert A. H. Cohen, Patheos

 

I wonder the same question I asked yesterday on a similar thread - where is the outrage from non Jews in respect to the Tory party's shameful, endemic anti Islamic position? Where is the outrage at Johnson's racist, homophobic and anti islamic outbursts, which are matter of record, not tenuously linked to him. 

It seems very strange that 7 Labour MPs would leave the party they are loyal to, claiming that the Party is antisemitic, and I repeat has Corbyn done enough. I just wonder if they were making these accusations up, I suspect not.

 

Some Jews are still voting for Corbyn’s Labour — they explain why

A recent JC poll found only 7 per cent of Jews would vote Labour. Ben Weich asks them why.

 

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/some-jews-are-still-voting-for-corbyn-s-labour-they-explain-why-1.492881

 

 

Where is the outrage at Johnson's racist, homophobic and anti islamic outbursts, which are matter of record, not tenuously linked to him. 

Boris Johnson at the time when he made his 'letterbox' remark was actually defending the right of Muslim woman to wear the burqua, but I do acknowledge his colourfull use of the letterbox remark was ill timed. But I don't think for one moment that Boris is a racist or an Islamophobe, it does however give the Toryphobes some ammunition to use againgst him.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, vogie said:

It seems very strange that 7 Labour MPs would leave the party they are loyal to, claiming that the Party is antisemitic, and I repeat has Corbyn done enough. I just wonder if they were making these accusations up, I suspect not.

 

Some Jews are still voting for Corbyn’s Labour — they explain why

A recent JC poll found only 7 per cent of Jews would vote Labour. Ben Weich asks them why.

 

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/some-jews-are-still-voting-for-corbyn-s-labour-they-explain-why-1.492881

 

 

Where is the outrage at Johnson's racist, homophobic and anti islamic outbursts, which are matter of record, not tenuously linked to him. 

Boris Johnson at the time when he made his 'letterbox' remark was actually defending the right of Muslim woman to wear the burqua, but I do acknowledge his colourfull use of the letterbox remark was ill timed. But I don't think for one moment that Boris is a racist or an Islamophobe, it does however give the Toryphobes some ammunition to use againgst him.

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, RuamRudy said:

We are getting a bit off topic, but there is no doubt about (1) islamaphobia in the Tory party (poll finds widespread Islamophobia among Conservative Party members); (2) Johnson's history of speaking of 'piccaninies' with 'watermelon smiles'; calling homosexuals 'bumboys', racially abusing black people (Natalie Rowe, for example).

So given the above, I would expect our Human Rights loving posters to be equally as vociferous in their outrage towards the Tories - in fact moreso, given the very serious nature of the facts, not innuendo and smears.

I think it's a case of "No smoke without fire" for both parties here. Attempts to suggest that one is in some way less bad than the other are misguided, they are different in ways it is true.

The Anti Islam one* has strong elements of racism behind it, and words certainly can hurt you as they lead to actions.

The anti semitic one is largely driven by disgust (Shared by decent people everywhere in the world) at the ethnic cleansing directed at the Palestinians. Corbyn is not an anti-semite per se, or indeed a racist at all. However there are a significant number of supporters (Albeit a fringe group) who have crossed the line from revulsion at Israel's actions into what is essentially racism. The Labour party has not dealt with these people either promptly or effectively - can we just be honest about this-  which has caused a split in the party, and alienated many Jewish former lifelong supporters. Are they all deceived by the anti Corbyn press, all of them, really?

 

The main topic is the Labour party manifesto, it has many very good ideas and attempts to role back many of the injustices heaped on the poor by years of uncaring Tory government. However did they have to go for the full monty, why re-nationalize so much at such a vast cost so soon. Hostages to fortune on a stupid scale. The Labour Party won in 97, partly because Brown said he would stick to Tory spending plans for the first two years. This totally took the wind out of the Tory attempts to label LP as spending crazy. Subtlety and Guile are utterly beyond this current LP, win first, then carry out your plans when you can afford them. 

 

*I try to avoid the use of the Phobia word, it has been abused to death, it real meaning relates to a serious medical/mental condition.

 

"his 'letterbox' remark was actually defending the right of Muslim woman to wear the burqua,"  No please,????????????  Boris the randy buffoon defending the rights of any women, especially ones who do not expose themselves for his delectation, you are having a laugh. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

I have never voted Labour in my life, and thankfully I have a far better alternative to the Nasty Party than either Labour or the Lib Dems, but it is interesting that all the criticisms of Corbyn are at a personal level rather than a critique of his policies. Could it be that our more vocal TV opponents of Corbyn are happy to let the right wing media in the UK do their thinking for them?

 

Voting for the Greens then?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Who decides what constitutes " a fair share" ? 

 

You, the EU socialist club, Corbyn and Marxist McDonnell? 

 

I wonder where the millionaire (billionaire?) ex banker Mrs. Corbyn keeps her wealth which is seemingly greater than the millionaire husbands? Check out how much her business sells coffee for per kg compared to what the impoverished farmers are paid. Ah, that's socialism for! Do as we say, not as we do. And realize that some are more equal!

The Government decides what’s a fair share.

 

[Disclosure: I will pay more income tax under Labour’s tax proposals].

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What like the millions of people who work full time but still rely on welfare to help them afford a roof over their head, food to eat and clothes to wear?

 

Or the hundreds of thousands relying on food banks to feed themselves? 

 

Or are you just trolling your ignorance of how millions of people live in today’s UK?

Millions of  lazy  buggers  yes.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

I have never voted Labour in my life, and thankfully I have a far better alternative to the Nasty Party than either Labour or the Lib Dems, but it is interesting that all the criticisms of Corbyn are at a personal level rather than a critique of his policies. Could it be that our more vocal TV opponents of Corbyn are happy to let the right wing media in the UK do their thinking for them?

 Personal criticism of the characters of the principal candidates for the post of Prime Minister is not exactly confined to Mr Corbyn. Mr Johnson certainly comes in for his share, on this forum and elsewhere some of it originating from the leadership of your "far better alternative"!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JAG said:

 Personal criticism of the characters of the principal candidates for the post of Prime Minister is not exactly confined to Mr Corbyn. Mr Johnson certainly comes in for his share, on this forum and elsewhere some of it originating from the leadership of your "far better alternative"!

I can’t for the life of me understand the unfair criticisms of Johnson, especially the invented stuff.

 

One only needs to keep in mind he’s an inveterate liar - not so much a criticism as an important fact.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The idea of the UK putting money aside for a financial crisis is fanciful nonsense.

 

Austerity was an option, borrowing to invest on infrastructure and development was another.

 

The Tories/Lib Dem chose Austerity and ignored the warnings of the damage it would do to UK society.

 

(Borrowing to bail out banks has never been a problem, though prosecuting bankers who wrecked the economy is apparently problematic - never mind the poor and those made poor can take the pain)

 

It's nothing of the sort, it's exactly what Lord Keynes recommended ... build up resources in the good times that can be applied during economic downturns. The problem is that Labour so-called Keynesians like Gordon Brown forgot that part ... they just focused on the part where Keynes suggested spending money.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

All British people should remember this IRA loving scumbag who is reluctant to stand for his own national anthem and who protested outside a trial of an IRA bomber denouncing the trial as a "show trial".

 

He's a dangerous lunatic whose being given a make over by the PR team just to get him elected.

thanks

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...