28 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

So 3 years ago we were the leader of the free world, but now we aren’t. And if we elect a democrat as president, we will resume being the leader of the free world? 

The global leadership was lost 3 years ago when he announced the wall paid by Mexico and closer relationship with Putin and Kim. It just got terribly worse culminating with his speech at the UN being mocked and by NATO allies. Any President will be better in leading than Trump. 

 

1 minute ago, Sujo said:

Who is the president.

 

So the loudest critics can flaunt and fraud quarantine and masks and social distancing day in and day out, running their mouths about how everyone should stay home etc but if the President shows up without a mask.... Even if hes likely to be the most tested person on the planet... 

 

THE HORROR! HOW DARE TRUMP! 

 

????

Hey trumps doing a good job all by himsielf failing bigly in handeling the response to the carona virus he doesent need to blame anybody but himself 

5 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

So the loudest critics can flaunt and fraud quarantine and masks and social distancing day in and day out, running their mouths about how everyone should stay home etc but if the President shows up without a mask.... Even if hes likely to be the most tested person on the planet... 

 

THE HORROR! HOW DARE TRUMP! 

 

????

He was in a factory where all workers must wear masks.  So he wore goggles. Easily confused.

16 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

So the loudest critics can flaunt and fraud quarantine and masks and social distancing day in and day out, running their mouths about how everyone should stay home etc but if the President shows up without a mask.... Even if hes likely to be the most tested person on the planet... 

 

THE HORROR! HOW DARE TRUMP! 

 

????

because Trump wants / would love - up to you -  his name printed on masks, like on the "big fat checks"

Edited May 6, 20206 yr by Opl

20 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Almost correct. Only assumptions and presumptions were heard. That is nothing to do with what was allowed. It was because the impeachers had no evidence at all, beyond the presumptions and assumptions we all heard from never-Trumpers like ex-ambassador Yovanovitch and Katie Hill.

If that is the case, why did the Trump Administration block any and all witnessess from appearing?  If he has nothing to hide, why the constant obfuscation and deflection? If he is so innocent of everything, why are so many of his close associates convicted criminals?  If he is such a stable genius, why does he surround himself with incompetents?

 

If all is well, why does he muzzle and dismiss anyone who speaks out?  If those who have spent years - if not their entire careers - learning deeply about a specialised subject  say something he does not like, why does he instantly start tweeting personal attacks? 

 

Why did he push chloroquine night after night after night...but suddenly go all quiet about it?  On what planet is  ingesting bleach a good idea - how could anyone with a fullty functioning brain even begin to wonder out loud, let alone do it in a press conference?  And then claim they were beign "sarcastic"? (Though maybe it is sarcasm when he says that he is doing a great job)

 

The man is a secondhand snake oil salesman.  He is a schoolyard bully.  Lyndsey Graham was totally right when he described him as a mysogenistic race-baiting bigot.

 

He shows himself time and time and time again to be interested only in his own self interest and publicity.  He panders to his "base" only in order to hear the reflected "glory" and try to get himself re-elected.  He cares only margnally more for them than for those who did not vote for him, who he acres less than nothing about, even though he ought to be President for the whole country.

 

He has openly stated that if everyone gets to vote in November, he will lose.  Democracy?  Not the one I know.

 

America please, please, please, please vote this sorry excuse for a human being out of office by the biggest margin in history.

 

PH 

16 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

So the loudest critics can flaunt and fraud quarantine and masks and social distancing day in and day out, running their mouths about how everyone should stay home etc but if the President shows up without a mask.... Even if hes likely to be the most tested person on the planet... 

 

THE HORROR! HOW DARE TRUMP! 

 

????

More accurate that he is the most rested person. He wakes up at 5 am, watched cable news till noon and spend most of the rest of the day on executive time and then dinner. Played more golf than any previous president too. ????

41 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

It is, but you declining to argue against it just confirms my position. 

You don't give any arguments to counter my opinion, but want me to argue your position.

No.

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

If I recall correctly, it was Trump who was first to label coronavirus as fake news. " Nothing to worry about".

You think an infection rate 5 times that of any other country is an achievement? More than double the death rate, with 3000 a day projected by the White House itself? A recovery rate of just 15% is getting stuff done? It's an alarming insight into how Trump has distorted your values.

A POTUS is only as good as his head infectious disease advisor,fauci, especially when he said late January "the virus is not a major threat to the USA ,at this time"

 

 Your accusation's mirror the opposition party narrative!

Edited May 6, 20206 yr by riclag

1 hour ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Thats your opinion, but Im old enough to remember how much the left LOVED the previous president no matter what he did, no matter how stupid and no matter how much it polarized the country. 

You're old enough to remember Barack Obama? Wow that must make you at least 13 years old.

10 minutes ago, riclag said:

A POTUS is only as good as his head infectious disease advisor,fauci, especially when he said late January "the virus is not a major threat to the USA ,at this time"

 

 Your accusation's mirror the opposition party narrative!

Was it Faucci who suggested injecting disinfectant and shining lights into the lungs?

47 minutes ago, Phulublub said:

If that is the case, why did the Trump Administration block any and all witnessess from appearing?  If he has nothing to hide, why the constant obfuscation and deflection? If he is so innocent of everything, why are so many of his close associates convicted criminals?  If he is such a stable genius, why does he surround himself with incompetents?

 

If all is well, why does he muzzle and dismiss anyone who speaks out?  If those who have spent years - if not their entire careers - learning deeply about a specialised subject  say something he does not like, why does he instantly start tweeting personal attacks? 

 

Why did he push chloroquine night after night after night...but suddenly go all quiet about it?  On what planet is  ingesting bleach a good idea - how could anyone with a fullty functioning brain even begin to wonder out loud, let alone do it in a press conference?  And then claim they were beign "sarcastic"? (Though maybe it is sarcasm when he says that he is doing a great job)

 

The man is a secondhand snake oil salesman.  He is a schoolyard bully.  Lyndsey Graham was totally right when he described him as a mysogenistic race-baiting bigot.

 

He shows himself time and time and time again to be interested only in his own self interest and publicity.  He panders to his "base" only in order to hear the reflected "glory" and try to get himself re-elected.  He cares only margnally more for them than for those who did not vote for him, who he acres less than nothing about, even though he ought to be President for the whole country.

 

He has openly stated that if everyone gets to vote in November, he will lose.  Democracy?  Not the one I know.

 

America please, please, please, please vote this sorry excuse for a human being out of office by the biggest margin in history.

 

PH 

Whats your point! Your comments have nothing to do with the topic 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

He also recommended individuals 65 and over, as well as people with chronic health conditions, largely remain at home.

just curious, how old is he

1 minute ago, shy coconut said:

Was it Faucci who suggested injecting disinfectant and shining lights into the lungs?

No, neither was it the POTUS! His statement suggested to research it!

13 minutes ago, riclag said:

A POTUS is only as good as his head infectious disease advisor,fauci, especially when he said late January "the virus is not a major threat to the USA ,at this time"

 

 Your accusation's mirror the opposition party narrative!

It was late February and Trump misquoted Fauci. Fact matters.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/trump-misquotes-fauci-on-coronavirus-threat/

hot air balloon

5 hours ago, PatOngo said:

Oh why, Donald? Maybe a look in the mirror will give you the answer as to why! It's not only the house or your fellow country men who feel this way! You are really quite obnoxious!

what's the word for more then obnoxious

4 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

It was late February and Trump misquoted Fauci. Fact matters.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/trump-misquotes-fauci-on-coronavirus-threat/

 Fact check your source"Defending his early response to the coronavirus pandemic".

The first sentence is wrong ,It wasn't a pandemic until March 11!

 

 Jan 30th:

DeGette, "who serves as chair of House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations panel, which oversees the CDC and NIH, said after the briefing that while the virus remains mostly contained in China, she remains concerned about the amount of time it will take to develop and deliver a vaccine to people throughout the U.S. should it start to spread here".

https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/us-health-officials-brief-lawmakers-on-spread-of-coronavirus

 

"Public health experts have warned that travel bans are not effective at stemming the spread of a virus and can make responding to an outbreak more challenging.

“From a public health perspective, there is limited effectiveness. And then there are a host of other reasons why they can actually be counterproductive,” said Catherine Worsnop, who studies international cooperation during global health emergencies at the University of Maryland". 

https://www.statnews.com/2020/01/31/as-far-right-calls-for-china-travel-ban-health-experts-warn-coronavirus-response-would-suffer/

This was the oppositions response to the POTUS when he banned china the next after the hearing on the31st.

 

 

Please source a dem positive response to the POTUS handling of the virus! Can you!

 

 

3 hours ago, PatOngo said:

Never under estimate the stupidity of the Rep voter!

The problem is Biden being much more of a liability than an asset.

Can see the Hillary factor coming in to play at the November election,anyone but Hillary becoming anyone but Biden.

 

Trump is the perfect counter to democrat ideology and their activists pretending to be journalists in the MSM.  Their heads explode with everything he says and while they are distracted he builds another mile of wall or appoints another judge.  To claim Trump didn't have evidence is farcical given the years of accusations thrown against him, using zero or fabricated evidence.  Don't think the massive over-reaction to this virus wasn't intended to harm him.  As always the truth comes out. 

 

Edited May 6, 20206 yr by metisdead
Trolling image removed.

10 minutes ago, riclag said:

 Fact check your source"Defending his early response to the coronavirus pandemic".

The first sentence is wrong ,It wasn't a pandemic until March 11!

 

 Jan 30th:

DeGette, "who serves as chair of House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations panel, which oversees the CDC and NIH, said after the briefing that while the virus remains mostly contained in China, she remains concerned about the amount of time it will take to develop and deliver a vaccine to people throughout the U.S. should it start to spread here".

https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/us-health-officials-brief-lawmakers-on-spread-of-coronavirus

 

"Public health experts have warned that travel bans are not effective at stemming the spread of a virus and can make responding to an outbreak more challenging.

“From a public health perspective, there is limited effectiveness. And then there are a host of other reasons why they can actually be counterproductive,” said Catherine Worsnop, who studies international cooperation during global health emergencies at the University of Maryland". 

https://www.statnews.com/2020/01/31/as-far-right-calls-for-china-travel-ban-health-experts-warn-coronavirus-response-would-suffer/

This was the oppositions response to the POTUS when he banned china the next after the hearing on the31st.

 

 

Please source a dem positive response to the POTUS handling of the virus! Can you!

 

 

Trump said he knew it was a pandemic before anyone else did. Next.

 

The virus came in from europe.

Edited May 6, 20206 yr by Sujo

1 minute ago, Sujo said:

Trump said he knew it was a pandemic before anyone else did. Next.

And he was 100% correct. Next.

6 hours ago, Zillod said:

Trump is the perfect counter to democrat ideology and their activists pretending to be journalists in the MSM.  Their heads explode with everything he says and while they are distracted he builds another mile of wall or appoints another judge.  To claim Trump didn't have evidence is farcical given the years of accusations thrown against him, using zero or fabricated evidence.  Don't think the massive over-reaction to this virus wasn't intended to harm him.  As always the truth comes out. 

 

Yes he has to distract from the wall because guess who is not paying for it.

Monmouth University Polling Institute

"When presented with a potential situation where the president and CNN provide conflicting information about the coronavirus outbreak, 51% of Americans say they would be more likely to believe the cable network and 38% would be more likely to believe Trump."

“It is difficult to look at the briefing transcripts and not see inconsistency from one day to the next. These poll results are just another reminder of how people filter information to reframe some facts and dismiss others in order to maintain their own internal consistency when it comes to perceptions of Trump,”

Edited May 6, 20206 yr by Opl

35 minutes ago, shy coconut said:

Was it Faucci who suggested injecting disinfectant and shining lights into the lungs?

let's not put words into the president's mouth!  he didn't specifically say "shine lights into the lungs."  that was in regard to injecting bleach, or a cleaning.  i never thought he actually meant to "inject" bleach as with a hypodermic syringe or IV, because that would be stupid!  i took it he wanted to use something like a hand-pump pesticide sprayer to coat the inside of the lungs, because that would be thinking bigly outside the box.  however he didn't say that directly.

 

"and is there a way you can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? as you see, it gets in the lungs..."

 

regarding light, he said "bring it into the body", but nothing specifically about the lungs.  he mentioned shining it through the skin, or "some other way."  with patients required to wear masks at all times, i'm not sure what other orifice that some other way would utilize.  nostrils?  yeah, that's it.  dog, i hope he meant nostrils.

 

"supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way."

2 hours ago, Mama Noodle said:

2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

I hope you right and the world leaders will stop laughing at him and lamenting that US is no longer the leader of the free world 

So 3 years ago we were the leader of the free world, but now we aren’t. And if we elect a democrat as president, we will resume being the leader of the free world? 

Could be a Democrat...or a Republican...or pretty much anyone not named Trump.  It's pretty hard to imagine any human being screwing things up as much as Trump has.  So he's got that going for him.

35 minutes ago, riclag said:

 Fact check your source"Defending his early response to the coronavirus pandemic".

The first sentence is wrong ,It wasn't a pandemic until March 11!

 

 Jan 30th:

DeGette, "who serves as chair of House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations panel, which oversees the CDC and NIH, said after the briefing that while the virus remains mostly contained in China, she remains concerned about the amount of time it will take to develop and deliver a vaccine to people throughout the U.S. should it start to spread here".

https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/us-health-officials-brief-lawmakers-on-spread-of-coronavirus

 

"Public health experts have warned that travel bans are not effective at stemming the spread of a virus and can make responding to an outbreak more challenging.

“From a public health perspective, there is limited effectiveness. And then there are a host of other reasons why they can actually be counterproductive,” said Catherine Worsnop, who studies international cooperation during global health emergencies at the University of Maryland". 

https://www.statnews.com/2020/01/31/as-far-right-calls-for-china-travel-ban-health-experts-warn-coronavirus-response-would-suffer/

This was the oppositions response to the POTUS when he banned china the next after the hearing on the31st.

 

 

Please source a dem positive response to the POTUS handling of the virus! Can you!

 

 

I see that you shifted the conversation away from Fauci. That’s fine if you got nothing to add that Trump misquoted Fauci for his own benefit. Typical. 
 

Anyway you again don’t quite fully understand that there was no ban but a travel restriction and there were many gaps that allowed travelers back from Wuhan. On top of that, other international airlines have stopped their flights to China before Trump’s restriction announcement.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trumps-ban-on-china-travel-his-claims-vs-reality-2020-03-27

3 hours ago, Puchaiyank said:

It is not about appearing Presidential...it is about getting th he job done...on many levels he has performed much better than we might have expected... 

I must admit, he's done a better job than I had thought. If only he hadn't been attacked for wanting to keep the Chinese out months ago.

Yeah he has really done great. Lots of ventillators and testing. Not.

 

But he did form a committee, that no one has heard from. congratulations

3 hours ago, Sujo said:

He was in a factory where all workers must wear masks.  So he wore goggles. Easily confused.

The people showing him around were not wearing masks. Please stop this stupidity.