I would not believe everything on Facebook. There is a legal issue if the Thai person is only a front for foreign ownership. Fake owner, fake marriage, fake company, hidden agreement, that is different. I asked AI to make a search based on your claims: I found examples of enforcement, but not a clear public example where a genuine Thai wife in a real marriage lost land only because the husband helped fund it. What I found points to three different things: Real crackdown examples are mostly nominee/company cases. Recent reports describe Thai authorities targeting companies where foreigners allegedly used Thai nominees or dummy shareholders to control land, villas, hotels, tourism businesses, cannabis farms, and similar structures. One report says companies were linked to foreigners who falsely listed Thai nominees as majority owners. Thai spouse ownership is legally allowed, but the Land Office wants the land treated as the Thai spouse’s personal property, not joint marital property. That is where the Sin Suan Tua form comes in. The Thai spouse can own land, but the foreign spouse normally signs away any claim to the land. There are court examples about foreign funded land in a Thai spouse’s name being treated as marital property for reimbursement or divorce value, but that is not the same as the state seizing land from a real wife because the foreign husband paid. So his Facebook claim has a legal seed, but it sounds exaggerated. The real danger is if the wife is only a front, the marriage is fake, or there is some hidden agreement showing the foreigner is the real owner. A normal marriage, family money, land in wife’s name, and no nominee structure is a different situation.
