Jump to content

Cabinet divisions break out over U.K. plan to override Brexit treaty


Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You must realise that situations change and if a Political party in Ireland wins an election , they may want something different to the previous Government, and so something needs to change .

   This is caused by the Irish electing a troublesome  Political party , instead of an agreeable one 

you mean "agreeable" to the tories,  correct  555

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TropicalGuy said:

Unionists are understandably Politicking against Protocol & IRA but Bad EU responsible too.
 

Both Solved by dissolving (all) UK Devolved Parliaments & legally ditching NI Protocol. Let these disparate people argue in NI etc. local council & institution chambers not at national level. 

The UK is not going to dissolve ‘Devolved Parliaments’, Washington had already given instruction on the matter.

 

Which begs a question; How’s your ‘sovereignty’ working out.

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The UK is not going to dissolve ‘Devolved Parliaments’, Washington had already given instruction on the matter.

 

Which begs a question; How’s your ‘sovereignty’ working out.

Seriously ? Putting sovereignty in speech marks as mockery is poor & unworthy. UK clearly not ruled by USA if that’s your point..Sovereignty a real & critical concept. Ask Ukraine about that ????

 

…..Sole reason in fact why I voted Leave.Actual Economics of Leaving too complicated back in 2016 although Principles of Free Trade / Lower Prices made sense).
 

Couldn’t care less about any short term Leaving difficulties made by others. ???????????????? Sorted over Time.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, TropicalGuy said:

Clearly an “ opinion” which needs no necessary links etc. 

555 ..... 555  don't you think that if people knew the reality and the potential draw backs of the brexit they would have agreed with it, please keep your opinion just to yourself, don't assume are people would have the same (opinion) as yours, not good to put words on somebody else's mouth

Edited by Mavideol
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Mavideol said:

so you want the same rights as if you were in the EU but without being in the EU, you decided to leave thus have to accept the good and the bad that comes out of it, shouldn't expect any special treatment just because you are the UK

We don’t but we expect / require “ reasonable” respectful treatment per Treaty.
 

There is no “ bad” to being a sovereign nation only short term difficulties in this case made by others. UK gladly pays any such price.

 

Moreover we decline to be ruled from Brussels by some unelected drunk anti- UK tosser from silly toy town countries like Luxembourg.????????

  • Thanks 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

is this a reliable source? if so why is the data not confirmed, below is the statement from your link, just in case feel free to check the definition  ....

unsubstantiated
/ˌʌnsəbˈstanʃɪeɪtɪd/

adjective

  • 1. not supported or proven by evidence: "unsubstantiated claims"  
Rating

UNSUBSTANTIATED

It is unclear how this figure was calculated. Neither the DUP, DAERA nor the European Commission could confirm the figure.

That’s why I said read the whole article including statements by UK Agricultural Minister forming the clear basis for the 20% figure????????

Posted
2 minutes ago, TropicalGuy said:

That’s why I said read the whole article including statements by UK Agricultural Minister forming the clear basis for the 20% figure????????

you really expected the UK Agricultural Minister to say something different, come on get real and accept/ respect the agreements

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Here’s a real ‘Imports Inspection’ problem.

 

The UK has failed to prepare for inspections at the EU/UK border, there are insufficient staff, insufficient facilities, insufficient procedures.

 

There is no obligation on any EU nation to inspect goods leaving or transiting through their territory to the UK.

 

Goods entering the EU to an EU nation final destination from ‘third nations’ are inspected at the first EU port of entry. (See example of goods arriving from UK to EU).

 

Goods arriving at any EU port from any ‘third nation’ that are destined for the UK are not being inspected by any EU nation, and they are almost certainly not being inspected by the UK’s inadequate customs inspections when they arrive in the UK.

 

The UK has almost no customs inspections on goods arriving from the EU or more worryingly goods shipped via the EU.

 

The UK’s borders are to all practical considerations open to smugglers.

 

Now what was all that about ’Control of our boarders’?

 

 

No interest in Customs Procedures only Outcome & Political Fix.

  • Haha 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

you really expected the UK Agricultural Minister to say something different, come on get real and accept/ respect the agreements

What he said has accountable factual basis.He is not to be lightly dismissed like some emotionally- driven “ no value” Twitter muppet. 


I have shown that EU is not respecting UK or Treaty but you and others are impervious to Reason & Facts, for reasons of emotional political narrative. Life is Bloody Difficult. Get Real. Anyway you are Dismissed. ????

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...