Scott 20901 Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 The New York Times reports that Beryl A. Howell, the chief judge of the Federal District Court in Washington, rules that the former president's lawyers have to hand over the names of private investigators whom they claimed conducted searches of Trump properties for additional classified documents. According to the Times, the Department of Justice wants the names of the investigators so it can question them personally on their findings. "The fact that the Justice Department sought a formal order for the investigators’ names suggests an increasing breakdown in trust between prosecutors investigating the documents case and Mr. Trump’s legal team," the paper writes. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-loses-again-in-yet-another-court-fight-over-mar-a-lago-documents-scandal/ar-AA161svc?li=BBnbfcL 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tug 30938 Posted January 6 Popular Post Share Posted January 6 Perhaps a perjury trap for Donnie’s lawyers?I have a sneaky feeling they are gonna start singing like little canary’s soon tweet tweet Donnie lmao 🤣 6 1 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing 95000 Posted January 6 Popular Post Share Posted January 6 (edited) At this point losing has become expected for the Biggest Loser. Death by 1000 cuts. Edited January 6 by Jingthing 9 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluespunk 61355 Posted January 6 Popular Post Share Posted January 6 Great news. 6 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tug 30938 Posted January 6 Popular Post Share Posted January 6 1 hour ago, Jingthing said: At this point losing has become expected for the Biggest Loser. Death by 1000 cuts. Well he’s a professional loser that’s what he does,his genius lies in the fact that he can bs so many rubes in to believing he’s a wine……oops winner 4 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bendejo 11862 Posted January 6 Popular Post Share Posted January 6 For six years (and counting!) we saw this scofflaw pushing at the rules with no reprimand beyond the certain press outlets saying "ooo! Look what he did now!" And after each move he upped the stakes with something even bolder. As I was saying during the time they were giving him enough rope. It's getting close to the noose end. Mr Smith has come to Washington. This must have been a rough week for him and the preening peacocks of the Senate, with all the press focused on The House. Or what should be The House, which does not exist as of this writing. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide 20709 Posted January 6 Popular Post Share Posted January 6 Well, that's what losers do: lose. 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot 58888 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Have have high hopes that while 2022 was a great year for Justice, 2023 is going to even better. Jack be nimble, Jack be quick. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jerno 2873 Posted January 7 Popular Post Share Posted January 7 Wonder if he's still sick of winning too much. Ha ha! 1 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendejo 11862 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 I suspect he has some sort of he-man fetish. When he gets taken down it has to be by someone he admires. Remember him being in awe of Bob Woodward? I haven't heard much about him doing the usual insult barrage on Smith. Or am I missing it? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot 58888 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 11 hours ago, Jerno said: Wonder if he's still sick of winning too much. Ha ha! I’m sure he’s sick of someone winning. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venom 1524 Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 (edited) They got six ways to Sunday! Edited January 8 by Venom Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyinBangrak 5429 Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Quite incredible how Trump's classified documents issue has dropped off the 24/7 news cycle it was on, isn't it? I wonder how that could have happened? Did unpredicted events force the narrative to change dramatically? From the most serious crime possible and a clear danger to US security, to crickets... I am left wondering if the outrage was justified and authentic? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tug 30938 Posted February 4 Popular Post Share Posted February 4 9 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said: Quite incredible how Trump's classified documents issue has dropped off the 24/7 news cycle it was on, isn't it? I wonder how that could have happened? Did unpredicted events force the narrative to change dramatically? From the most serious crime possible and a clear danger to US security, to crickets... I am left wondering if the outrage was justified and authentic? Don’t be sad it’s just winding it’s way through the system the world keeps moving on as far as the many humiliating thing’s trump has done to our country this one is incredibly serious willful obstructive and highly illegal it’s a coming for old Donnie 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo 13355 Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 Once a Special Counsel is involved, things start going quiet. ...but hey, you guys will always have Hunter. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron 22983 Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 Koch network will oppose Trump in 2024 https://www.rawstory.com/koch-trump/ 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide 20709 Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 15 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: Quite incredible how Trump's classified documents issue has dropped off the 24/7 news cycle it was on, isn't it? I wonder how that could have happened? Did unpredicted events force the narrative to change dramatically? From the most serious crime possible and a clear danger to US security, to crickets... I am left wondering if the outrage was justified and authentic? Trump has been rather quiet about it, indeed. It's now three weeks since the last time he insulted the special counsel. It's unusual. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dotcalm 594 Posted February 6 Popular Post Share Posted February 6 (edited) It would be interesting if there are doc prosecutions, (Nope ain't going to happen) Trump could subpoena Biden since he's such an ardent collector of classified documents that he would make an excellent witness in testifying on how easy it is to “accidentally” wind up with loads full of classified material, how effortlessly it can be lost track of, and how difficult it is to prevent access by a crack addict and foreign agent? Slow Joe claims he knew nothing of these docs while Trump had his docs under lock and key and guarded by the secret service and was in negotiations with NARA. In Biden's case it appears that his docs were locked in a garage accessed/used by his crack addicted son and others stored in a closet at UPenn. If Biden is subpoenaed, he needs to respond and he cannot claim “executive privilege.” A VP is not the head of the Executive Branch and the privileges of that office do not extend to him. This folks is another reason why Trump will never be prosecuted for his current records dispute. Edited February 6 by dotcalm 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendejo 11862 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 On 2/5/2023 at 5:45 AM, ozimoron said: Koch network will oppose Trump in 2024 https://www.rawstory.com/koch-trump/ Looking forward to DT going after the Kochs. Looking forward to Koch going after DT. While the wind cries "third party." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heybruce 28141 Posted February 6 Popular Post Share Posted February 6 (edited) 3 hours ago, dotcalm said: It would be interesting if there are doc prosecutions, (Nope ain't going to happen) Trump could subpoena Biden since he's such an ardent collector of classified documents that he would make an excellent witness in testifying on how easy it is to “accidentally” wind up with loads full of classified material, how effortlessly it can be lost track of, and how difficult it is to prevent access by a crack addict and foreign agent? Slow Joe claims he knew nothing of these docs while Trump had his docs under lock and key and guarded by the secret service and was in negotiations with NARA. In Biden's case it appears that his docs were locked in a garage accessed/used by his crack addicted son and others stored in a closet at UPenn. If Biden is subpoenaed, he needs to respond and he cannot claim “executive privilege.” A VP is not the head of the Executive Branch and the privileges of that office do not extend to him. This folks is another reason why Trump will never be prosecuted for his current records dispute. Key point: Trump knew he had thousands of documents, many of them highly classified, that he had no right to possess and he refused to return them. Funny how you overlooked that. Also, as has been explained many times, the Secret Service was not at Mar-a-Lago to guard classified documents. They probably didn't know they were there. Yet you keep repeating the lie that the Secret Service was guarding the classified at Mar-a-Lago. There is a line between willful ignorance and trolling. You crossed that line long ago. Edited February 6 by heybruce 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder 37134 Posted February 7 Popular Post Share Posted February 7 9 hours ago, dotcalm said: It would be interesting if there are doc prosecutions, (Nope ain't going to happen) Trump could subpoena Biden since he's such an ardent collector of classified documents that he would make an excellent witness in testifying on how easy it is to “accidentally” wind up with loads full of classified material, how effortlessly it can be lost track of, and how difficult it is to prevent access by a crack addict and foreign agent? Slow Joe claims he knew nothing of these docs while Trump had his docs under lock and key and guarded by the secret service and was in negotiations with NARA. In Biden's case it appears that his docs were locked in a garage accessed/used by his crack addicted son and others stored in a closet at UPenn. If Biden is subpoenaed, he needs to respond and he cannot claim “executive privilege.” A VP is not the head of the Executive Branch and the privileges of that office do not extend to him. This folks is another reason why Trump will never be prosecuted for his current records dispute. First off, Trump had no right to be in negotiations with NARA. The laws says hand them over when asked. Second, he claimed to have handed them all over after the first round of negotiations. NARA got word that this wasn't the case. The Justice Dept subsequently asked to be allowed to search boxes where it was suspected documents that Trump denied having might be stored. That request was refused. It was only after this that the Justice Dept got its search warrant. It turned out that many of the documents in question were in the box that the Justice Dept requested access to. By lying to the Justice Dept Trump could be found guilty of obstruction of justice. Also, willful violation of the law is another crime. NARA actually allowed him a huge amount of slack by not invoking the legal system immediately once it was established that he willfully refused to turn over the requested documents to NARA. They gave him lots of time to comply. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamnutsak 5859 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Well Hunter Biden's laptop will be joined by Donald Trump's laptop. How rich, and I don't mean Seth Rich. A Trump lawyer said a current aide's laptop turned in to federal investigators contained a copy of a classified folder, report says Former President Trump's lawyer turned in a laptop belonging to a former aide, outlets reported. The lawyer reportedly told federal agents the computer contained a folder with classification markings. Sources told CNN the aide did not realize the documents were classified. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-aide-laptop-copies-of-classified-docs-report-says-2023-2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.