1 hour ago, stevenl said:

You're in luck then that I provided the link to show your opinion doesn't correlate with the facts.

No need to thank me, my new years gift to you.

Actually no cigar.

 

From the link you kindly provided I see that there are 117,000 people waiting for a decision, but no mention of how many have been processed.

There is a 76% rate of success for THE ONES ALREADY PROCESSED, but that does not mean that the same will apply with all 117,000 and more joining the queue with the arrival of every leaky boat.

It's entirely possible that the rate of success could fall significantly lower, and my point of view will be vindicated.

 

BTW, Britain IMO is not obliged to provide every arrival with an income, accommodation, and health care at Britons expense IN BRITAIN. IMO they are only obligated to keep them safe and from being returned to their own country if at risk by doing so. Sending them all to such as Rwanda IMO fulfills Britain's obligations under international law ( Australia isn't being sanctioned for exactly that solution ), and I support their right to do so. If so doing makes others think better of wasting money on criminal gangs so much better.

30 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Actually no cigar.

 

From the link you kindly provided I see that there are 117,000 people waiting for a decision, but no mention of how many have been processed.

There is a 76% rate of success for THE ONES ALREADY PROCESSED, but that does not mean that the same will apply with all 117,000 and more joining the queue with the arrival of every leaky boat.

It's entirely possible that the rate of success could fall significantly lower, and my point of view will be vindicated.

 

BTW, Britain IMO is not obliged to provide every arrival with an income, accommodation, and health care at Britons expense IN BRITAIN. IMO they are only obligated to keep them safe and from being returned to their own country if at risk by doing so. Sending them all to such as Rwanda IMO fulfills Britain's obligations under international law ( Australia isn't being sanctioned for exactly that solution ), and I support their right to do so. If so doing makes others think better of wasting money on criminal gangs so much better.

555555

 

So now facts have to meet your parameters, or they are false.

 

Again you post no link to back up your claims, and that is because you are wrong, and there are no real links.

 

Your empty echo chamber, shows you lack the intelligence, to know how stupid your comments have become.

 

Your ignore list is long, not because people are rude, but because you refuse to accept anything you do not agree with, and when you get called out your standard response is that ignore button.

 

You lack the ability, to use any critical thinking and are so blinded that you think you can never be wrong.

 

Have you ever visited Britain? Or do you just think you the expert on everything, and use these forums as your outlet for your BS?

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

You're in luck then that I provided the link to show your opinion doesn't correlate with the facts.

No need to thank me, my new years gift to you.

The kiwi beachlover, finds the truth and facts unnecessary, and then claims they are insults, because he cannot accept reality.

 

The ignore button is his ‘get out of jail card’ so he does not have to listen the truth.

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Actually no cigar.

 

From the link you kindly provided I see that there are 117,000 people waiting for a decision, but no mention of how many have been processed.

There is a 76% rate of success for THE ONES ALREADY PROCESSED, but that does not mean that the same will apply with all 117,000 and more joining the queue with the arrival of every leaky boat.

It's entirely possible that the rate of success could fall significantly lower, and my point of view will be vindicated.

 

BTW, Britain IMO is not obliged to provide every arrival with an income, accommodation, and health care at Britons expense IN BRITAIN. IMO they are only obligated to keep them safe and from being returned to their own country if at risk by doing so. Sending them all to such as Rwanda IMO fulfills Britain's obligations under international law ( Australia isn't being sanctioned for exactly that solution ), and I support their right to do so. If so doing makes others think better of wasting money on criminal gangs so much better.

Actually, the poster said "most ARE fake". He didn't say "most will be found to be fake."

 

Most definitely a Hamlet moment.