TallGuyJohninBKK Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 A new study based on 4,605 participants in the Michigan COVID-19 Recovery Surveillance Study shows that the prevalence of long COVID symptoms at 30 and 90 days post-infection was 43% to 58% lower among adults who were fully vaccinated before infection. ... The 30- and 90-day timeframes were meant to compare two different definitions of long COVID. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines the condition as new or persistent symptoms 4 weeks after infection, while the World Health Organization definition defines it as 12 or more weeks after infection. ... Overall, 32.2% of adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 reported 30-day long COVID and 17.5% reported 90-day long COVID in the study. The prevalence of 30-day long COVID was 43% lower among the vaccinated group... The adjusted prevalence of 90-day long COVID was 58% lower among the vaccinated group. (more) https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/study-shows-43-58-lower-prevalence-long-covid-among-vaccinated-people https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1047279724000310 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingtlger Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 There are a lot of anti-vaccinators that claim that some of the vaccines cause blot clotting which can cause strokes or heart attacks but I think the benefits outweigh the negatives.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted February 28 Author Share Posted February 28 (edited) 45 minutes ago, flyingtlger said: There are a lot of anti-vaccinators that claim that some of the vaccines cause blot clotting which can cause strokes or heart attacks but I think the benefits outweigh the negatives.... AFAIK, the only place where vaccine-related serious blood clotting was a very RARE problem was with the AZ vaccine (and with the similar, little used J&J vaccine in the U.S.) ... and generally not with the mRNA vaccines. That's part of the reason why the AZ vaccine was never approved in the U.S., and ultimately ceased to be used in places like the U.K. -- while use of the mRNA vaccines continued apace. There is no evidence that mRNA vaccines are linked to blood clots By Reuters Fact Check August 27, 2021 https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-mrna-clots/fact-check-there-is-no-evidence-that-mrna-vaccines-are-linked-to-blood-clots-idUSL1N2PY1K2/ https://health-desk.org/articles/there-s-no-evidence-that-mrna-vaccines-are-linked-to-blood-clots "the mRNA vaccines have not been associated with any kind of clotting problem." "in fact, evidence suggests COVID-19 vaccination prevents blood clots by protecting against COVID-19, which raises the risk of clotting." https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/scicheck-post-misconstrues-public-health-awareness-campaigns-about-blood-clots/ Edited February 28 by TallGuyJohninBKK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now