Jump to content

Scrutiny Over Gaza Death Toll Figures: UK Statistics Watchdog Investigates Hamas's Data


Recommended Posts

image.png

 

In the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, the reliability of casualty figures provided by Hamas has come under intense scrutiny. The British Statistics Authority is now examining whether the death toll data from the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza can be deemed trustworthy. This development follows recent revelations that Hamas itself has acknowledged "incomplete data" concerning a significant portion of Gazan deaths.

 

Sir Michael Ellis KC, the former Attorney General, has raised concerns about the accuracy of casualty figures and has alerted the UK Statistics Authority to Hamas's admission. According to Hamas's own statistical report released on April 6, approximately one-third of the deaths recorded during the Israel-Gaza conflict lack essential data points such as identity numbers, full names, dates of birth, or dates of death.

 

Sir Michael emphasized the importance of scrutinizing Hamas's reports, considering the organization's status as a terrorist group. He noted that relying on Hamas's casualty figures without question would be imprudent, especially in light of their recent acknowledgment of incomplete data. This admission raises doubts about the reliability of the overall death toll reported by Hamas.

 

The Hamas-run health ministry claims that over 33,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 76,000 wounded in Gaza since the start of the conflict. However, these figures do not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Meanwhile, Israel has stated that it targeted around 13,000 Hamas members in Gaza and approximately 1,000 inside Israel following Hamas's invasion and subsequent attacks on civilians.

 

Critics, including Conservative MP Andrew Percy, have voiced concerns about the uncritical acceptance of Hamas's casualty figures by civil society, media outlets, and politicians. Despite previous warnings about the questionable nature of these figures and Hamas's history of manipulating casualty data, they have been widely cited as factual.

 

The revelation of Hamas's acknowledgment of inflated casualty figures underscores the need for greater scrutiny and caution when citing such data. David Adesnik, director of research at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies (FDD), emphasized that Hamas has a vested interest in shaping the narrative surrounding casualties in the conflict.

 

As the UK Statistics Authority conducts its investigation, the outcome will shed light on the reliability of casualty data provided by Hamas and underscore the importance of rigorous scrutiny in reporting on complex and contentious conflicts like the Israel-Gaza conflict.

 

2024-04-22

Source

 

image.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...