Jump to content

Fire in Royal Gardens


Georgealbert

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Small fire overnight, reported at 00.30, in Royal Gardens. No injuries reported, but lots of smoke logging.

 

You normally would expect Shopping Malls to have fire dampers and automatic smoke extraction to prevent this sort of smoke spread, but that could have been effected by the shops being closed and shuttered.

 

Video posted by local rescue service below.

 

https://fb.watch/s6dCZPYUiH/?

 

IMG_2792.jpeg

IMG_2795.jpeg

IMG_2793.jpeg

Edited by Georgealbert
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Another, good reporting Scoop 👍

 

Probably one of those EV vehicles, disability scooter or similar self combusting. 

 


Looking at the pictures and video I have seen, from the incident, this looks like a slow burning, smouldering type fire, lots of smoke and little flame, unless the fire was contained within a closed/shuttered shop and the smoke logging is secondary.

 

Not ruling out anything as the cause, as have seen no pictures of where the fire started, but would be very surprised if this was thermal run away of a Li-ion battery, as the smoke characteristics are wrong.

 

Looking at the fire hose layout and positioning of used extinguishers, it appears the fire may have started in the shop pictured below, which may have a menu outside.

 

 

 

IMG_2797.jpeg

Edited by Georgealbert
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Georgealbert said:


Looking at the pictures and video I have seen, from the incident, this looks like a slow burning, smouldering type fire, lots of smoke and little flame, unless the fire was contained within a closed/shuttered shop and the smoke logging is secondary.

 

Not ruling out anything as the cause, as have seen no pictures of where the fire started, but would be very surprised if this was thermal run away of a Li-ion battery, as the smoke characteristics are wrong.

 

Looking at the fire hose layout and positioning of used extinguishers, it appears the fire may have started in the shop pictured below, which may have a menu outside.

 

 

 

IMG_2797.jpeg

Agree

 

Lots of smoke. 

 

Too bad about extraction of the smoke you mentioned earlier, that smoke gets into everything. 

 

So sorry for the shop owners, lots of destroyed items that will have to be thrown out, replaced. 

 

 

Edited by SAFETY FIRST
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Agree

 

Lots of smoke. 

 

Too bad about extraction of the smoke you mentioned earlier, that smoke gets into everything. 

 

So sorry for the shop owners, lots of destroyed items that will have to be thrown away. 

 


I believe that the units there, are protected by sprinklers, so the fire may have been contained, but not extinguished by the sprinklers, hence the density and appearance of the smoke, is a lot thinner/clearer that may be expected. The fire service are using PPV (positive pressure ventilation) fans to try to clear the smoke, which maybe in addition to any fixed extraction systems.
 

It is impossible to determine what happened, as there is not enough information available, from a few pictures and video, but an investigation should be fairly easy to determine seat of fire and cause. Any investigation has to be open minded, looking at all information found at the scene, it does not work if you have a preconceived idea of a cause, and then try to get the fire scene to fit that idea.

 

Yes the smoke will have caused a lot of damage to clothing, food supplies, electrical appliances, fitting, etc and the owners will face difficulties cleaning up and stock will be ruined.

Edited by Georgealbert
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Updated information on the incident, states that the fire started in equipment in a hairdressers/beauty salon, on floor 1.

 

Two people are reported to have required first aid for smoke inhalation, it is not clear if they were emergency responders, as the mall was closed to the public at the time of the fire. Video of the incident does show many people inside in the smoke without suitable respiratory protection, covid masks do not stop the effects of smoke.

 

IMG_2808.jpeg

Edited by Georgealbert
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 83

      IRAN ATTACKS ISRAEL

    2. 1

      Calamity of voter fraud found! -- it's the immigrant wife of a Republican Cong. candidate

    3. 5

      Bangkok airport runway gears up for November opening

    4. 76

      Having kids when old

    5. 44

      Trump Urges Israel to Strike Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

    6. 83

      IRAN ATTACKS ISRAEL

    7. 13

      Post-Y2K BUG & The New American Bedlamism: Was America, historically, ever this crazy?

    8. 51

      American Woman Flies 18 Hours to See Famous Hippo ‘Moo Deng’

    9. 103

      Boozy Australian Tourist Restrained by Phuket Airport Police

    10. 5

      Thai PM Paetongtarn Reflects on ACD Summit Success

    11. 83

      IRAN ATTACKS ISRAEL

    12. 1

      Calamity of voter fraud found! -- it's the immigrant wife of a Republican Cong. candidate

    13. 83

      IRAN ATTACKS ISRAEL

    14. 110

      Thailand's Cashless Leap: Ahead of the Asean Pack by 2028

    15. 92

      Minister Pushes for Bangkok F1 Race Plan with 2024 Deadline

×
×
  • Create New...