.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
!!
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
58
Looks like Americans fight most here?
It won't work. Too many lunatics who would take a potshot. People shoot each other over trivial issues. In 2010, among males. there were 15 firearm deaths per 100,000. By 2020, it was 22 per 100,000 (DaCruz, Bryant University, , but gun ownership is more or less the same (Gallup). Its not because of more crime. In 2010, the crime rate was 389 reported crimes per 100,000, by 2019, it was down to 360 per 100,000 (Statista). People are just shooting each other more. -
0
Spirit of Ukraine Independence Day August 24, 2024
As Ukraine marks 33 years of independence on August 24, 2024, the occasion is shadowed by the grim reality of an ongoing war with Russia. This is the third consecutive Independence Day that Ukrainians have observed under the dark clouds of conflict, with the nation locked in an existential struggle against a determined aggressor. Despite immense sacrifices and remarkable resilience, Ukraine faces a formidable adversary that remains relentless in its pursuit to dismantle Ukrainian statehood. Mykola Bielieskov, a Research Fellow at the National Institute for Strategic Studies and Senior Analyst at the Ukrainian NGO "Come Back Alive," reflects on this dual milestone—the celebration of independence and the somber commemoration of 30 months of Russia's full-scale invasion. Despite suffering significant losses, estimated at 500,000, Russia continues to press forward with its objective of eradicating Ukraine as a sovereign state. However, instead of succumbing to what many anticipated would be a swift Russian victory, Ukraine has shown extraordinary courage and tactical innovation. Ukrainian forces have not only repelled Russian advances but have also conducted bold offensives, including a recent operation in Russia's Kursk region. The Ukrainian navy, military intelligence, and security services have secured the Black Sea, ensuring freedom of navigation while pioneering the use of unmanned surface vehicles in combat. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Air Force has begun transitioning to F-16 fighter jets, an essential move that, alongside indigenous long-range firepower capabilities, has enabled Ukraine to strike Russian military installations and oil depots effectively. These achievements are even more impressive considering the delays and complications in receiving military support from the United States and Europe. Yet, despite these military successes, Ukraine has not yet achieved its primary strategic goal: forcing Russia to reassess its ability to win the war. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains confident in Russia's capacity to outlast Western support for Ukraine and to exploit any divisions within Ukrainian society. Bielieskov argues that this precarious situation calls for a well-resourced and comprehensive Western strategy that goes beyond the current ad hoc crisis management approach. Western nations must commit to providing Ukraine with the necessary military and technological advantages to shift the balance on the battlefield decisively. Moreover, Ukraine's integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions is essential for a lasting resolution to the conflict and to counter Russia's theory of victory. Such an investment by the West in Ukraine's future will ultimately prove worthwhile, as Ukraine has demonstrated its capability to deliver on its promises. Mariana Budjeryn, a Fellow at the Global Europe Program, emphasizes the extraordinary journey Ukraine has undertaken in its 33 years of independence. For Ukraine, these years have been marked by constant change, often driven by crises and upheavals as much as by periods of stability and growth. Despite the challenges of post-Soviet economic and political transitions, which gave rise to oligarchy and corruption, Ukraine has managed to cultivate a resilient civil society, maintain an independent press, and foster political plurality with regular transitions of power—an exception rather than the rule in the post-Soviet space. These achievements, Budjeryn notes, often came at the cost of instability, as they were forged in the crucible of mass protests, such as the 2004 Orange Revolution and the 2014 Revolution of Dignity. Democracy in Ukraine has been a messy and hard-fought process, but it reflects the values that Ukrainians hold dear: an open society governed by laws, respect for human rights, and a government accountable to its people. The widespread desire among Ukrainians for integration with Euro-Atlantic structures is a testament to the governance model they aspire to emulate. In contrast, Russia, another post-Soviet state, has taken a markedly different path. Under the autocratic rule of Vladimir Putin, Russia has become a neo-feudal hierarchy, where state power is unaccountable, and society is subjected to relentless propaganda by state-controlled media. This is the model of governance that few Ukrainians wish for their country. Instead, Ukraine is now engaged in an existential battle, defending its right to pursue a path different from Russia's, at a tremendous cost in lives and resources. As Ukraine continues to fight, Budjeryn urges the international community not to forget the remarkable progress Ukrainians have made in just 33 years. The determination and resilience of ordinary Ukrainians have brought about profound historical changes, and their struggle today is a continuation of that fight for a better future. Tetiana Khutor, Chairwoman of the Institute of Legislative Ideas, highlights the staggering costs of Ukraine's reconstruction, which a joint assessment in February 2024 estimated at $486 billion, with potential losses reaching up to a trillion. Currently, the financial burden falls on Western and Ukrainian taxpayers, while the aggressor state and its enablers evade responsibility. Khutor stresses the urgent need for consistent funding and calls for Western countries to hold those responsible for the war accountable. One critical step in this direction is using proceeds from frozen Russian assets as collateral for a $50 billion loan, a move that should be just the beginning. The ultimate goal is to leverage the full $300 billion in frozen assets as the primary source of compensation for the victims of Russian aggression. Anything less would be inadequate in making the aggressor pay for the devastation it has caused. Khutor also points to the complicity of international corporations that continue to operate in Russia, contributing approximately $20 billion annually in taxes to the Russian state and thus financing the ongoing atrocities. While 409 businesses have exited Russia, over 2,000 remain, undermining Western support for Ukraine. Forcing these companies to leave the Russian market or imposing a "Continued Operations Sanction Toll" could help offset the damages inflicted by the war. Additionally, Khutor suggests that investigations into sanction evasion across Europe and the United States, which generate billions in fines and confiscated assets, could provide a sustainable financial support source for Ukraine. By implementing these measures, the financial burden would be shifted onto Russia and its enablers, deterring future aggression, further isolating Russia economically, and ensuring that wars of aggression do not go unpunished. Dr. Iren Marinova from Colorado State University reflects on the seismic shifts in the EU’s security and defense landscape triggered by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This invasion shattered the illusion of a peaceful continent under the protection of a normative power Europe and forced European leaders to reevaluate the EU's security needs in a rapidly changing geopolitical environment. It quickly became clear that Ukraine is an integral part of Europe’s future, and the EU has rallied around this notion over the past two years. However, the conflict has also exposed significant deficiencies in the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), particularly the requirement for unanimity voting, which often leads to stalemates when quick, decisive action is needed. The debate over the implementation of qualified majority voting (QMV) in CFSP has gained traction, with EU High Representative Josep Borrell identifying it as essential for the EU to function as a geopolitical player capable of presenting a unified position in times of crisis. The path to implementing QMV is fraught with challenges, as many member states view it as a threat to their national interests. A balance must be struck between sovereignty concerns and European unity, with the possibility of a "sovereignty safety net" that would reassure skeptical member states that their national interests would still be protected. Despite these challenges, EU leaders have made it clear that a future Europe without Ukraine is inconceivable. Nevertheless, the EU faces a difficult road ahead in terms of political will and policy reforms, with the CFSP being one policy area to watch closely as the region enters the third year of the full-scale invasion and moves closer to Ukrainian EU membership. Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, emphasizes the existential threat Ukraine faces as it endures its "darkest hour." Putin's ultimate goal, Merezhko argues, is to restore the Soviet empire by depriving Ukrainians of their statehood and national identity through a full-scale imperialist war. This war is not just a conflict between two states; it is enabled by a coalition of aggressive totalitarian regimes, including Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea. For Ukraine to survive, Merezhko insists, solidarity among the free democratic world and strong American leadership are crucial. The best security guarantee for Ukraine is its membership in NATO. Russia's narrative that it is waging war against Ukraine because of "NATO enlargement" is both contrary to international law and fundamentally illogical. The reality, as Merezhko sees it, is that Russia views its neighbors as either enemies or vassals, and these countries seek NATO membership not as an act of aggression but as a means of preserving their independence in the face of Russian aggression. To ensure that Russia no longer poses a threat to global order and security, Merezhko argues that Russia must undergo decolonization, demilitarization, and de-Putinization. Only through these processes can Europe and the world become safer. The recent decades have seen a global backsliding of democracy and the rise of authoritarianism, and Merezhko believes that a decisive victory for democratic Ukraine over totalitarian Russia is essential to reversing this trend. Such a victory would reinforce the principles of freedom over tyranny and international law over might, sending a clear message to potential aggressors that international crime does not pay. Mykhailo Minakov, a Senior Advisor at the Kennan Institute, reflects on the profound impact the war has had on Ukrainian studies and scholarly perspectives. In 2021, to mark the 30th anniversary of Ukrainian independence, the Kennan Institute published a scholarly history of contemporary Ukraine that analyzed the country's development in democratic politics, market economy, and other areas. At that time, despite ongoing conflicts in the Donbas, Ukraine was viewed through a lens of peaceful progress and a hopeful future. However, three years later, the war has fundamentally changed how Ukrainian history and development are understood. The conflict has brought about a shift in priorities and perspectives, with Ukrainian studies now focused on issues of survival, resilience, and the existential struggle for national identity and sovereignty. The war has also fostered a deeper appreciation of Ukraine's place in global history, as the nation's fight against Russian aggression has come to symbolize a broader struggle for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. As Ukraine continues to endure the hardships of war, its people remain steadfast in their commitment to defending their independence and sovereignty. The 33rd anniversary of Ukraine's independence is a testament to the resilience and determination of a nation that refuses to be subdued. As the world watches, the outcome of this conflict will not only shape the future of Ukraine but also have far-reaching implications for the global order and the principles that underpin it. Credit: Wilson Center 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Robert Jenrick’s Vision for Tory Unity: A Possible Return for Boris Johnson?
In the ongoing Conservative leadership contest, Robert Jenrick has made it clear that he would be "delighted" to have Boris Johnson in his shadow cabinet if he were to win the race. Jenrick, the former immigration minister, believes that the Conservative Party needs to bring its best talent to the forefront if it hopes to become an effective Opposition and eventually regain power. Jenrick’s endorsement of a possible return for Johnson highlights his belief that the Conservatives must capitalize on the strengths of their most prominent figures. Despite Johnson’s controversial exit from Number 10 in July 2022, Jenrick sees the former prime minister as a valuable asset. Johnson was forced out after the Chris Pincher scandal triggered a wave of resignations within his government. Later, Johnson resigned as an MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip after a Commons inquiry concluded that he had misled Parliament over the notorious partygate affair. When asked about the prospect of including Johnson in his top team, Jenrick expressed his openness to the idea. "I think what we need are the best people who are available in the Conservative family to be on the pitch, supporting us to be a strong Opposition, holding Keir Starmer to account for all of the failings that we already see, and ultimately winning the next general election," Jenrick told The Telegraph. He added that he would be "delighted" to have Johnson involved if the former prime minister wished to return to frontline politics. Boris Johnson, for his part, has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with the Downing Street parties. He has accused the Commons of conducting a "witch hunt" against him. Although Johnson briefly considered a return to politics when Liz Truss's government collapsed, he ultimately decided not to pursue it, recognizing that he might struggle to unify the party. Since stepping down, Johnson has been far from idle. He has amassed a significant fortune through speaking engagements and continues to write a column for the Daily Mail. Although he chose not to stand in the July general election, he has not ruled out a return to politics in the future, leaving the door open for another chapter in his political career. Jenrick’s leadership bid comes after he resigned from his role as Rishi Sunak's immigration minister last year. He now faces stiff competition from other high-profile Conservatives, including Kemi Badenoch, James Cleverly, Dame Priti Patel, Mel Stride, and Tom Tugendhat. The winner of this contest will be tasked with the monumental challenge of uniting the Conservative Party, which has been fractured by internal conflicts and struggles to regain public support following its worst general election defeat in history. A recent poll of 805 Tory party members conducted between August 2 and August 12 revealed James Cleverly as the most popular candidate, with 26% backing him. He is followed by Priti Patel with 20%, Kemi Badenoch with 14%, Tom Tugendhat with 11%, Robert Jenrick with 10%, and Mel Stride with 4%. However, previous surveys have produced different results, and a clear frontrunner has yet to emerge. As the leadership contest progresses, Tory MPs will vote to narrow down the field of candidates. Once only two candidates remain, the final decision will be made by the Tory membership, who will cast their votes to determine the next leader of the Conservative Party. The outcome of this contest will not only decide the party’s future leadership but also its strategy in opposing the Labour government led by Keir Starmer and its chances of reclaiming power in the next general election. Credit: Sky News 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Raygun: From Olympic Breakdancer to Reality TV Star
Rachael Gunn, known by her stage name "Raygun," has recently signed with a talent agency, marking a new chapter in her unexpected rise to fame. Gunn, who gained attention during her breakdancing performance at the Paris Olympic Games, has been a subject of both media fascination and public scrutiny. Despite the mixed reactions to her Olympic appearance, Gunn's presence in the Australian media continues to grow. At 36, Gunn's journey has taken a surprising turn. She has been linked with a potential appearance on the popular reality show "I’m a Celebrity… Get me out of here!" and has officially signed with Born Bred Talent, an influencer marketing agency. With her Instagram following now at an impressive 197,000, Gunn has embraced her newfound notoriety by adding a contact from the agency to her social media bio. The old adage that "all publicity is good publicity" seems to apply here, as Gunn has received a flood of media attention both in Australia and internationally since her memorable Olympic performance. Her breakdancing routine, which included moves like "the sprinkler," a snake impression, and a kangaroo hop, left audiences both shocked and amused. Celebrities such as Adele, Jimmy Fallon, and DJ Fatboy Slim have all referenced Gunn since her Olympic appearance, with Fatboy Slim humorously remarking, "we would have given you 10 out of 10, Rachael," in a video that compared her moves to those in his iconic "Praise You" music video. Gunn remained silent in the immediate aftermath of her Olympic performance but eventually broke her silence with a social media post last week. She followed this up with a cameo appearance at the TV Week Logies Awards. However, some in the industry believe that Gunn may have missed an opportunity to fully capitalize on her sudden fame. A public relations expert expressed concern that Gunn may have waited too long to translate her widespread media coverage into lucrative deals. "If she was taking this seriously, she should have already done five international talk shows by now," the expert told Daily Mail Australia. The expert also noted that despite having some of the biggest stars in the world talking about her, Gunn's management has only managed to secure a pre-recorded message on the Logies. In her social media post, Gunn addressed her Olympic experience, insisting that she gave her all in the competition. She also called for an end to the harassment directed at her "family, friends, and the breaking community" in the wake of her performance. Despite the challenges, Gunn's journey appears to be far from over. Reports suggest that she has caught the attention of the producers of "I’m a Celebrity… Get me out of here!" The show, known for placing celebrities in a rugged campsite environment and subjecting them to a series of challenges and eliminations, seems to have identified Gunn as a potential contestant for its next season. This opportunity could prove to be a significant and profitable move for Gunn, who might need to act quickly if she wants to make the most of her rapid rise to fame. While her Olympic performance did not win over the judges—Gunn failed to win a single round in her three appearances in Paris—she did manage to win a new legion of fans with her self-deprecating humor and unique style. However, the judges and much of the world saw things differently, which only adds to the complexity of Gunn's public image. As Gunn navigates her newfound fame, the coming months will reveal whether she can turn her 15 minutes of fame into a lasting career. Her decision to join a talent agency and potentially appear on a major reality TV show suggests that she is serious about making the most of her moment in the spotlight. Whether or not she can sustain this momentum remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Raygun's journey is far from ordinary, and the world is watching to see what she does next. Credit: NYP 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
When Should Teenagers Embark on Their First Parent/Adult-Free Holiday
In recent weeks, the question of when it is appropriate to allow teenagers to embark on their first parent-free adventure has sparked heated debate among parents, especially after TV presenter Kirstie Allsopp revealed that she allowed her 15-year-old son to go Interrailing across Europe with a friend. While some see such experiences as crucial for building independence and confidence, others worry about the risks involved in letting their children venture out into the world without adult supervision. Dan Gregson, a 49-year-old teacher, faced this dilemma when his sons, aged 18 and 15, asked to go on their first trip without adults. Gregson admits he felt "very worried" even when they simply wanted to visit a skatepark in central London, and trips abroad were out of the question until now. His eldest son, who is 18, is planning to travel to Barcelona with friends next month, a prospect that still makes Gregson uneasy. "I know he’s sensible, it’s just other people I worry about," he says. "I worry that someone around him will start an argument. I went to Spain when I was 16, but it feels like the world has changed. There’s more aggression in the air now." The debate about the appropriate age for parent-free holidays has been reignited by Allsopp's recent decision, which she defended on social media. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Allsopp shared, "My little boy has returned from 3 weeks inter-railing, he’ll be 16 on Wednesday so he went with a mate who’s already 16 due to hostel/travel restrictions, but they organised the whole thing; Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, Berlin, Munich, Marseille, Toulouse, Barcelona & Madrid." She emphasized the importance of fostering independence in children, writing, "In this increasingly risk-averse world it’s vital that we find any ways we can to give our children the confidence that only comes from trusting them. If we’re afraid, our children will also be afraid. If we let go, they will fly." Gregson takes a more cautious approach, questioning why his children want to travel alone in the first place. He believes in gradually building up to such experiences to reduce anxiety for both the parents and the child. For him, 17 is the youngest age at which a child should be allowed to leave the country without an adult, with 18 being even better. He plans to enforce strict rules for his son, such as daily texts, something that is already part of their routine at home. However, not all parents share Gregson's cautious stance. Kate Row-Ham, a 48-year-old personal trainer from Brighton, allowed her eldest son to go to Newquay with six friends when he was just 15. "I think it all depends on the person and their level of maturity and how far they are going," she says. Row-Ham believes that a confident, streetwise teenager could be ready to travel independently as early as 13. Although she was nervous when her son first went away after his GCSEs, the availability of apps like Snapchat and Life360 made it easier for her to stay in touch. Since then, she has allowed her son to travel to Ibiza and Mallorca with friends, and she is now preparing to let her 15-year-old daughter go to Newquay with her mates next summer. Row-Ham offers her children practical advice for staying safe while traveling: "I’ll give her the same advice I give my son which is to keep her phone on, call me if you have any issues, never let anyone buy you drinks, and to never leave your wingman/woman. I also remind them how important it is to enjoy themselves and have a good time. It’s good to give kids confidence and let them know you trust them." Legally, children over the age of 12 can fly with parental consent, but there is no minimum age for traveling alone by train within the UK or on an Interrail pass in Europe. This leaves the decision of when to allow independent travel largely in the hands of parents. Psychologist Anna Mathur, who specializes in parenting and is the author of "How To Raise A Happier Mother," acknowledges that there is no definitive age at which it becomes appropriate for a child to travel alone. "It all comes down to the individual child and parent, and the relationship between them," Mathur explains. Mathur suggests that parents consider several factors when making this decision, including their child’s friendship group, how far away they will be traveling, and their child’s personality and life experiences. "If it were a teenager with a large group of friends who I didn’t know and who is quite immature and might not cope when those relationships come under pressure on holiday, I wouldn’t feel comfortable letting them go," she says. However, Mathur also encourages parents to examine their own anxieties and determine whether their fears are based on valid concerns or on past experiences. "Is it a valid fear or is it a projection of something that happened to you?" she asks. "It’s important not to let your own hang-ups stop your child from enjoying freedoms which they might actually deal well with." While ground rules are important, Mathur advises against making them too restrictive. "It has to be a collaborative agreement otherwise you’ll just get pushback," she warns. Some parents find ways to compromise, as Harriet Morley from Hampshire did when she allowed her 16-year-old daughter to go away with three friends to a house in Wales. Morley felt comfortable with the arrangement because she knew the owner of the house and there were people nearby who could keep an eye on the group. However, she admits that she might not extend the same freedom to her son when he reaches the same age. "My daughter is very sensible, and I knew that her and her friends would respect the house," Morley explains. "They’ve earned our trust to allow us to let them have this adventure." For parents who decide to say no to a post-exams trip, psychologist Mathur advises that they prepare for their teenager to be angry and upset. "Even if you explain to your teenager really clearly why they can’t go, they’ll probably still be angry and upset," she says. "But that’s OK – it’s important to hold those boundaries for your child. And to know that you’re not saying ‘no, never’ you’re saying ‘not yet’." Kate Row-Ham reflects on her own teenage holidays to Cornwall as "amazing experiences" and feels it would be a shame to deprive her children of similar opportunities. "They have to learn some life lessons themselves," she concludes. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
The Rebranding of Traveller Pupils as ‘Mobile Children’ in the UK
The Department for Education (DfE) has recently introduced a significant change in its guidance on pupil absences, particularly concerning children from traveller families. In the latest update, the term "mobile children" has replaced previous references to traveller pupils, a move aimed at focusing on the mobility of the child rather than their ethnicity. This change is part of the DfE's ongoing efforts to clarify the application of exemptions related to school absences and ensure that these exemptions are applied equitably. The new guidance, which came into effect earlier this week, has removed all references to gipsy, Roma, or traveller families. Instead, it introduces the term "mobile children" to describe pupils "of no fixed abode" who are absent from school because their parents are "travelling in the course of their trade or business." The Telegraph reports that this rebranding is intended to encompass not only children from traveller families but also other children whose families might travel for occupational reasons. Under the current legal framework, children from traveller families have long been recognized as having legitimate reasons for missing school. These absences are categorized under the "T code" in school registers, which signifies an authorized absence due to parental travel for work. This code is part of a broader system that includes other types of authorized absences, such as the "H code" for approved holidays, "M" for medical absences, and "R" for religious observances. The previous guidance, which had been in place since May 2022, specified that the "T code" was applicable to various groups under the umbrella term "traveller." This included "Roma, English and Welsh gipsies, Irish and Scottish travellers, showmen (fairground people), circus people, bargees (occupational boat dwellers), and new travellers." However, the updated guidance no longer makes any mention of these specific demographics, instead broadening the "T code" to apply to any situation where a "parent is travelling for occupational purposes." Baroness Smith of Malvern, an education minister, has explained that the new term "mobile children" was introduced to make it clear that the exemption is related to the child's mobility rather than their ethnicity. This change aims to prevent any potential confusion or misapplication of the exemption, ensuring that it is based solely on the circumstances of the child's life rather than their ethnic background. Despite the DfE's rationale for the change, the rebranding has raised questions among advocacy groups. The Advisory Council for the Education of Romany and other Travellers has expressed concern, stating that the purpose of the new terminology is "unclear" given that the laws concerning school absence for traveller families have not been altered. This group has a history of campaigning against efforts to repeal specific sections of the Education Act 1996, which protect travelling parents from being prosecuted for school attendance offenses if their child misses school due to the family's nomadic lifestyle. The Advisory Council previously argued against a 2011 proposal by the former coalition government to eliminate this exemption, warning that such a move "would increase the difficulties faced by nomadic families and would not improve attendance." The group's concerns highlight the ongoing tension between ensuring educational access for all children and accommodating the unique circumstances of traveller families. Data from the DfE underscores the prevalence of school absences among traveller children. In the 2023-24 autumn term alone, nearly 79,000 absences were recorded using the "T code." Of these, approximately 55 percent were for gipsy Roma pupils and those identified as travellers of Irish heritage. An additional 43 percent of the absences were recorded for children classified as white British, white Irish, or of other white heritage, amounting to over 31,000 absences. The statistics also reveal that pupils of Irish traveller heritage had the highest overall absence rates last year, with an alarming 22.9 percent. This was followed closely by gipsy or Roma pupils, who had an absence rate of 18.2 percent. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of Irish traveller pupils were classified as persistent absentees in the 2022-23 school year, meaning they missed at least 10 percent of the academic year. For gipsy or Roma pupils, the figure was 65 percent. The updated guidance also advises schools not to "unnecessarily ask for proof that the parent is travelling for occupational purposes" when applying the "T code" to mark a child's absence. Schools are instructed to request proof only when there is "genuine and reasonable doubt about the authenticity of the reason for absence given." This provision is likely an attempt to balance the need for accountability with respect for the circumstances of mobile children and their families. The challenges faced by traveller children in the education system extend beyond attendance. A 2020 study by The Traveller Movement revealed that one in five traveller pupils felt compelled to leave school due to bullying, and two-thirds of those surveyed reported feeling bullied by their teachers. These findings highlight the broader issues of discrimination and exclusion that traveller children often face within the school environment, which may contribute to their high rates of absence. The DfE has been approached for comment on the new guidance and the concerns raised by advocacy groups. However, the department's position appears to be that the changes are intended to provide clarity and fairness in the application of school absence exemptions. The rebranding of traveller pupils as "mobile children" reflects a broader trend within the education sector to focus on the circumstances of the child rather than their ethnic background, in an effort to ensure that all pupils receive equitable treatment. As the education system continues to evolve, it will be essential to monitor the impact of these changes on traveller children and their families. Ensuring that the needs of mobile children are met without compromising their access to education will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration between the DfE, schools, and advocacy groups. Only by addressing the root causes of absenteeism and providing adequate support can we hope to improve educational outcomes for all children, regardless of their background or lifestyle. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Revealed the Hidden Stakeholders of Elon Musk's X
Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, previously known as Twitter, has recently disclosed a comprehensive list of its investors due to a lawsuit brought by former employees. These employees are seeking the payment of arbitration fees incurred after Musk’s acquisition of the platform. X had initially argued that its investors should remain confidential as part of their "routine practice and policy." However, a federal judge in California ordered the unsealing of the list, revealing a diverse and sometimes surprising group of stakeholders. Among the nearly 100 owners of X are several well-known figures, both from the world of high finance and the social media ecosystem itself. High-profile investors like Fidelity have long been associated with X, particularly after reports suggested that the platform's value had dropped by 72% since Musk took control. This newly unsealed document confirms Fidelity's substantial involvement, with almost 30 separate entities linked to Fidelity holding stakes in X. The list also uncovers some lesser-known stakeholders who, until now, were not widely recognized as being connected to Musk's venture. For instance, the Pershing Square Foundation, led by billionaire investor Bill Ackman and his wife, Neri Oxman, is listed as one of the owners. Ackman, known for his vocal presence on social media, often uses X to engage in public debates with high-profile individuals like Mark Cuban and to voice his opinions on various issues, including those related to his alma mater, Harvard University. Another significant name on the list is Oracle founder Larry Ellison, who owns a stake in X through the Lawrence J. Ellison Revocable Trust. Despite Ellison’s substantial wealth and influence, he is not a frequent user of the platform. In fact, he has only posted on X twice—once in 2012 and again in 2023—despite having over 130,000 followers. Sean “Diddy” Combs, the American rapper and entrepreneur, also appears among the owners. His stake in X is tied to Sean Combs Capital, a company that aligns with his broader business ventures under the Combs Global umbrella. Over the years, Combs has launched multiple businesses, including the Sean Combs Foundation and Combs Investments, solidifying his status as a prominent figure in both entertainment and business. Musk's ambitious project has also caught the attention of royalty. HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud, a Saudi prince with a net worth close to $19 billion, holds a stake in X. Prince Alwaleed’s investments extend beyond social media, as he also owns shares in luxury hotels like the Four Seasons and the Savoy, as well as other technology companies such as Lyft. Interestingly, despite his public criticism of Musk’s leadership, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey still retains shares in the platform through the Jack Dorsey Remainder LLC. Dorsey initially supported Musk's takeover of Twitter but later distanced himself from the platform’s direction, expressing his discontent on a rival social media site, Bluesky, where he remarked, "It all went south." In addition to these well-known figures, the unsealed documents also highlight a number of individual investors and organizations that have a stake in X. These include Danilo Kawasaki and Ross Gerber, leaders of the wealth and investment management firm Gerber Kawasaki, who are listed as both individual investors and representatives of their firm. Silicon Valley venture capital firms such as 8VC, Andreessen Horowitz, and Sequoia are also prominent stakeholders in the platform. Of course, the list would be incomplete without mention of Musk himself. The SpaceX founder is listed as a major stakeholder through the Elon Musk Revocable Trust. Musk acquired X for $44 billion in 2022, a move that has since been fraught with challenges, including the departure of key advertisers, significant layoffs, and widespread criticism of Musk’s strategic decisions. Despite the controversies surrounding Musk's management, the release of this list provides a rare glimpse into the diverse and influential group of individuals and entities that have backed his ambitious social media venture. As the platform continues to evolve under Musk's leadership, the roles and influence of these stakeholders may come under greater scrutiny, particularly as X navigates the complex landscape of digital media and communication in the coming years. The full list 8VC Opportunities Fund II, L.P. ADREM X LLC ADREM Y LLC Afshar Partners, LP Andrea Stroppa Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III, L.P. Anthem Ventures, LLC ARK Venture Private Holdings LLC BAMCO, Inc. Bandera Fund LLC Baron Opportunity Fund Baron Partners Fund Binance Capital Management Co., Ltd Brookfield Project X L.P.•CCM 2020 Investments LLC Cheng and Chen Family Trust CNK Fund IV, L.P. Danilo Kawasaki Dayton Family Enterprises, LLC Dayton Family Investments, LLC DFJ GROWTH IV, L.P. DFJ GROWTH IV PARALLEL FUND, LLC DFJ GROWTH X-I, L.P. Eden Relationship Capital L.P. Elon Musk as Trustee of the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003 FIAM Target Date Blue Chip Growth Commingled Pool By: Fidelity InstitutionalAsset Management Trust Company as Trustee Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management TrustCompany, as Trustee Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Institutional Trust By its manager Fidelity InvestmentsCanada ULC Fidelity Canadian Growth Company Fund by its manager Fidelity InvestmentsCanada ULC Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios LLC: Fidelity U.S. Equity Central Fund -Communication Services Sub Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund – Sub A Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund – Sub B Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Contrafund•Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Contrafund K6 Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund Fidelity Contrafund Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management Trust Company,as Trustee Fidelity Destiny Portfolios: Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Fidelity Global Growth and Value Investment Trust – Sub A By its manager Fidelity Investments Canada Fidelity Global Innovators Investment Trust by its manager Fidelity InvestmentsCanada ULC Fidelity Growth Company Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management TrustCompany, as Trustee Fidelity Insights Investment Trust By its manager Fidelity Investments CanadaULC Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust: Fidelity Growth Company Fund Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust : Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust: Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund Fidelity OTC Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee Fidelity Puritan Trust: Fidelity Puritan Fund – Equity Sub B Fidelity Puritan Trust: Puritan K6 Fund – Equity Subportfolio•Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity OTC Portfolio Fidelity Select Portfolios : Select Communication Services Portfolio•G64 Ventures LLC Gerber Kawasaki Inc. GFNCI LLC Gigafund 0.21, LP Glacier Ventures LLC Go Mav, LLC HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud IMG US, LLC Jack Dorsey Remainder LLC Jack Dorsey Tr Ua 12/08/2010 Jack Dorsey Revocable Trust Kingdom Holding Company Lawrence J. Ellison Revocable Trust Linda Ye and Robin Ren Family Foundation Litani Ventures•Luchi Fiduciaria SR POS. 365 Manhattan Venture Partners X LLC Mirae Asset Innovation X ONE, LLC Mirae Asset Project X Fund I, LP•Olivier Janssens Q Tetris Holding LLC Ross Gerber Santo Lira LLC SC CDA1 LLC SCGE Fund, L.P.•SCGGF III – U.S./India Management, L.P. SCHF (M) PV, L.P. Scott Nolan SC US/E Expansion Fund I Management, L.P. Sean Combs Capital, LLC Sequent (Schweiz) AG as Trustee of the Debala Trust Sequioa Capital Fund, L.P. Series N Dis, a series of Atreides Special Circumstances Fund, LLC Shahidi Tactic Group, LLC Steve Davis T. One Holdings LLC The Pershing Square Foundation TM33 Partner Holdings Tresser Blvd 402 LLC UnipolSai S.P.A. Variable Insurance Products Fund II: VIP Contrafund Portfolio – Subportfolio A VYC25 Limited X Holdings I Investment, LLC Credit: Fortune 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Yemen's Weapon Trade on X: A Disturbing Digital Marketplace
In a grim and troubling turn of events, weapons dealers in Yemen are leveraging the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to openly market and sell a range of deadly arms. The offerings include everything from Kalashnikovs and pistols to grenades and grenade launchers, with these transactions occurring in broad daylight on a platform accessible to millions worldwide. These dealers, operating primarily in the Yemeni capital of Sana’a and other territories under the control of the Houthis, are not just selling weapons but are doing so with apparent impunity. The Houthis, a rebel group with backing from Iran, have been labeled as terrorists by both the United States and Australian governments. The fact that such transactions are taking place so openly has raised serious concerns about the Houthis' involvement in these sales. Edmund Fitton-Brown, a former British Ambassador to Yemen who now works with the Counter Extremism Project, voiced his alarm about the situation, stating, "It is inconceivable that they [the weapons dealers] are not operating on the Houthis’ behalf." Fitton-Brown's comments highlight the likelihood that these arms dealers are not independent operators but are likely working under the auspices or with the tacit approval of the Houthi leadership. He further suggested that any purely private dealers attempting to supply weapons to other entities, such as the Yemeni government, would likely face swift retribution and be shut down. The scope of this illegal arms trade was uncovered by an investigation conducted by The Times, which found several Yemeni accounts on X, some of which bore the platform’s blue tick of verification. The verification symbol, once a marker of authenticity and credibility, is now being used by arms dealers to lend legitimacy to their operations, a development that is as ironic as it is alarming. Both The Times and the BBC have reached out to X for a response regarding these findings, but as of yet, the social media platform has remained silent. This silence is particularly concerning given that most of X's content moderation team was laid off following Elon Musk's acquisition of the company in 2022. The lack of moderation has seemingly turned X into a haven for illicit activities, including the sale of weapons in war-torn regions like Yemen. The advertisements posted by these Yemeni weapons dealers are predominantly in Arabic, targeting local customers in a country where firearms are ubiquitous. It is often said that in Yemen, the number of guns outnumbers the population by a ratio of three to one. The BBC found numerous online advertisements offering weapons at prices listed in both Yemeni and Saudi riyals. These advertisements are not shy about the products they are selling. Instead, they use persuasive language to attract buyers, boasting of the quality and reliability of their merchandise. One advertisement proclaims, "Premium craftsmanship and top-notch warranty," while promoting a modified AK-47 as "your best choice." Another ad includes a demonstration video, shot at night, showing a seller firing a 30-round magazine on full automatic. Yet another listing offers sand-colored Glock pistols, produced in Pakistan, for around $900 each. These ads, designed to entice potential buyers, are not hidden away in obscure corners of the internet or the Dark Web, where illegal transactions typically occur. Instead, they are in plain sight on X, visible and accessible to anyone with an internet connection. The blatant visibility of these weapons ads on a major social media platform has sparked calls for urgent action. Tech Against Terrorism, a UK-based NGO, has issued a plea to technology platforms, urging them to take immediate and decisive action to remove Houthi-supporting content from the internet and social media. The organization's concern is not just about the sale of weapons but also about the broader implications of allowing terrorist groups to use these platforms to spread their influence and fund their operations. The Houthis, a tribal minority based in Yemen's mountainous regions, seized power in 2014, toppling the UN-recognized government. Since then, Yemen has been plunged into a devastating civil war, with a Saudi-led military campaign failing to dislodge the Houthis from power. The conflict has resulted in widespread suffering, with Yemen experiencing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. In late 2023, the Houthis, who possess a significant arsenal of drones and missiles, many of which are supplied by Iran, escalated their operations by targeting commercial and naval shipping in the Red Sea. These attacks, they claim, are in support of Palestinians in Gaza. However, many of the targeted vessels have no direct connection to Israel, leading to widespread condemnation of the Houthis' actions. The US-led maritime force stationed offshore has been unable to prevent these attacks, which have severely disrupted trade routes through the Suez Canal, a vital artery for global commerce. The revelation that weapons dealers in Yemen are using X to facilitate their trade adds another layer of complexity to an already dire situation. It raises serious questions about the responsibility of social media platforms in preventing the spread of violence and terrorism. The ease with which these dealers can operate on X, coupled with the platform’s apparent lack of oversight, suggests a troubling trend where digital spaces are being exploited by those who seek to profit from chaos and conflict. As Yemen continues to grapple with the consequences of a protracted civil war, the international community must confront the reality that social media platforms, once heralded as tools for connection and communication, are now being used to fuel violence and instability. The need for robust and effective regulation of these platforms has never been more urgent. Without decisive action, the situation in Yemen could serve as a grim precedent for how technology can be misused in conflict zones, with devastating consequences for peace and security. Credit: BBC 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
British Army Lieutenant Colonel Brutally Attacked in a Shocking Case of Attempted Murder
In a shocking and violent incident that has left the military community and the public reeling, a highly experienced and respected Lieutenant Colonel in the British Army was brutally attacked outside his home. The victim, identified as Lieutenant Colonel Mark Teeton, was left seriously injured after being stabbed repeatedly in what authorities have described as an attempted murder. Lt Col Mark Teeton, who has served the British Army for over two decades, is a long-standing and dedicated officer. For the past six years, he has held the position of course manager at the 1 Royal School of Military Engineering Regiment. His contributions to the military have been significant, and he has earned a reputation as a committed leader and a dedicated servant to his country. The attack occurred on a quiet Tuesday evening near Lt Col Teeton's residence, which is located close to Brompton Barracks. As he was heading home, a man reportedly ran up behind him, pulled him to the ground, and began stabbing him repeatedly. The assailant, later identified as 24-year-old Anthony Esan, was arrested shortly after the incident near his home in Rochester, which is not far from the scene of the crime. The horrifying nature of the attack has stunned the local community and the nation at large. Lt Col Teeton, who is in his 40s and a father of two, was airlifted to a nearby hospital where he remains in a serious but stable condition. The quick response by emergency services undoubtedly played a crucial role in saving his life, but the psychological and emotional toll of such a violent assault will likely be long-lasting. Anthony Esan, the man accused of carrying out this brutal attack, has been charged with the attempted murder of Lt Col Teeton. He has also been charged with possessing an offensive weapon in a public place. Esan made his first appearance in Medway Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, where he was seen wearing a grey T-shirt. During the hearing, the details of the vicious attack were laid bare, with Prosecutor Rajni Prashar providing a chilling account of what transpired that evening. “A member of the public called 999 to report a male had been stabbed. It was then reported that the victim was a soldier in uniform,” Prashar told the court. She went on to describe how Esan was seen “running up behind” Lt Col Teeton before pulling him to the ground and stabbing him “repeatedly.” Esan was remanded in custody following his court appearance and is scheduled to appear next at Maidstone Crown Court on August 22. As the legal process continues, there is a palpable sense of shock and disbelief that such a horrific act could occur, especially against a member of the armed forces who has dedicated his life to serving his country. Lt Col Teeton's career in the military is marked by a series of achievements and contributions that have earned him respect and admiration among his peers. According to his LinkedIn profile, his service in the armed forces dates back to 2001, and over the years, he has taken on various roles that have showcased his leadership skills and commitment to the military's mission. Earlier this year, Lt Col Teeton participated in the D-Day Challenge in Normandy, a grueling event that commemorates the bravery and sacrifice of soldiers during World War II. The challenge also serves as a fundraiser, and Lt Col Teeton managed to raise nearly £2,500 for Combat Stress, a charity dedicated to providing mental health support for veterans. In the lead-up to the event, he expressed his deep respect for both past and present servicemen, writing: “In honour of our forefathers as well as current servicemen who have bravely fought to protect our way of life, I will be taking on the D-Day Challenge to raise vital funds for life-changing mental health treatment for veterans.” After completing the challenging event, Lt Col Teeton posted a video in which he humorously recounted how he nearly passed out at the finish line, but emphasized that it was all worth it. “It was worthwhile... it’s a good amount of money to a fantastic charity,” he said, highlighting his unwavering commitment to supporting his fellow servicemen and women. The attack on Lt Col Teeton has elicited strong reactions from military leaders and political figures alike. General Sir Roly Walker, the head of the Army, condemned the stabbing in the strongest possible terms, calling it “horrific.” His sentiments were echoed by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who expressed his deep shock and outrage at the incident, stating that he was “shocked and appalled” by the senseless act of violence. As Lt Col Teeton continues to recover in the hospital, the thoughts and prayers of many are with him and his family during this difficult time. The military community, in particular, has rallied around one of its own, offering support and solidarity in the face of this tragic event. The case against Anthony Esan will proceed through the legal system, with many hoping that justice will be served for the heinous act committed against Lt Col Teeton. In the meantime, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks and dangers faced by those who serve in the armed forces, even when they are off-duty and away from the battlefield. The attack has also sparked conversations about the need for greater protection and support for military personnel, both during and after their service. As the nation grapples with the implications of this incident, the focus remains on Lt Col Teeton’s recovery and the pursuit of justice for the crime committed against him. Credit: The Independent 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Trump’s Tough Stance on Migrant Crime: A Pledge to Crack Down with Severe Penalties
Former President Donald Trump made headlines once again by promising to impose harsh penalties on illegal migrants found guilty of serious crimes. During a news conference in Cochise County, Arizona, near the US-Mexico border, Trump outlined his vision for a more stringent legal framework targeting illegal migrants who commit heinous acts. Among his proposals was the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences, life imprisonment, and even the death penalty for the most egregious offenses. “We will impose tough new sentences on illegal alien criminals, including 10-year mandatory minimum sentences for anyone found guilty of human smuggling; a guaranteed life sentence for anyone found guilty of child trafficking; and a death penalty for anyone guilty of child or woman sex trafficking,” Trump declared. His remarks underscored his belief that current laws are insufficient to deter crime and protect American citizens from the dangers posed by illegal migrants. Trump's commitment to harsher penalties didn't stop at human traffickers. He also vowed to extend the death penalty to major drug dealers and traffickers, drawing a direct line between the illegal drug trade and the violence that often accompanies it. The former president, who has been a vocal supporter of law enforcement throughout his political career, also called for capital punishment for anyone convicted of killing law enforcement officials, including police, sheriffs, border patrol agents, and ICE officers. “The death penalty with a quicker trial,” Trump emphasized, “not a trial that lasts for 15 years and everyone gets exhausted.” In his remarks, Trump also highlighted the challenges law enforcement faces in maintaining security along the southern border, describing the situation as increasingly dangerous. “The amount of injuries sustained in fights and shootings is just incredible,” Trump said, acknowledging the physical and mental toll on those tasked with guarding the border. Trump’s visit to Arizona also included a tour of the remnants of a border wall project that he had approved during his presidency. The project, however, was halted once the Biden administration took over. Trump inspected the heaps of steel that lay unused, rusting in the desert sun. “It could have been put up in a matter of weeks. It was all set to go,” Trump lamented, referring to the stalled construction efforts. Describing the unbuilt sections as the “Rolls-Royce” of walls, Trump criticized President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for not completing the project, accusing them of favoring open borders. He further claimed that much of the unused paneling had been sold off “for five cents on the dollar.” The news conference also provided a platform for grieving families, often referred to as “Angel Moms,” who have lost loved ones to crimes committed by illegal migrants. Among them was Patty Morin, whose 37-year-old daughter Rachel was brutally murdered last year while jogging on a trail in Bel Air, Maryland. The suspect, a 23-year-old illegal migrant from El Salvador, is also accused of other heinous crimes. Speaking to the press, Patty expressed her strong support for Trump’s plan to secure the border and crack down on migrant crime. “We are 1,800 miles from the border,” Patty noted, emphasizing the far-reaching impact of what she described as an open border policy. “And because of this open border, we’ve had two [cases] in the same county where illegal immigrants have come in and raped and murdered our citizens.” Patty’s words were a powerful reminder of the personal toll of migrant crime, as she pleaded, “I really want our words to be heard. We’re here because we are losing our moms, our daughters, our children to criminals – and that shouldn’t happen.” Patty’s sentiment was echoed by Alexis Nungaray, the mother of 12-year-old Jocelyn, who was assaulted and murdered in Houston by illegal migrants. Nungaray criticized the system that allowed her daughter’s alleged killers to remain free. “There were over 300 detention beds they should have been at,” Nungaray said, pointing out that one of the suspects was wearing an ICE ankle bracelet at the time of the crime. “They were detained and released when they shouldn’t have been released,” she argued, expressing frustration at the failure of immigration enforcement to prevent such tragedies. “We are losing very innocent people to heinous crimes that shouldn’t be happening in the first place,” Nungaray added, her anger and grief palpable as she addressed the gathering. The former president’s tough stance on migrant crime received support from within the Republican Party. JD Vance, the Republican Vice Presidential nominee, echoed Trump’s message during a news conference in Georgia, held just before Trump’s border speech. Vance praised Trump’s proposed agenda, saying, “Donald Trump believes that we ought to make our law enforcement lives easier by closing down that southern border and getting the drug cartels out of our communities.” Vance also expressed concern about changes to immigration laws supported by some Democrats and Republicans, which Trump opposed. He warned that these changes would enshrine policies like “catch and release” into law. “This is where a person comes into our country, they claim asylum, and then they’re released into our country with no follow up. Sometimes they don’t come back for five years. Sometimes they don’t come back for 10 years,” Vance explained, criticizing the current administration’s approach to border security. “Kamala Harris and Joe Biden implemented catch and release through executive order, their so-called border security package would have made catch and release the law of the land. So even if you have a guy like Donald Trump come in, he can’t undo it,” he added, highlighting the potential long-term consequences of such legislation. Former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy also weighed in, offering a sharp critique of the Democratic Party’s stance on border security. Speaking on the sidelines of the Democratic National Convention, Ramaswamy pointed out the irony of the heavy security measures surrounding the event. “I’m grateful that Democrats appear to now agree with Donald Trump’s policy of building a wall,” Ramaswamy quipped. “If only they cared as much about keeping illegals out of our country as they do keeping their own left-wing protesters out of their own convention, our border crisis would actually be behind us.” His comments underscored the deep divisions between the two major political parties on the issue of immigration and border security. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Trump’s proposals and the broader Republican agenda on immigration and crime will likely continue to be central topics of debate. With passionate support from those affected by migrant crime and backing from prominent Republicans, Trump’s tough-on-crime message resonates with a significant portion of the electorate. However, it also raises questions about the balance between law enforcement, human rights, and the complexities of the immigration system. As the nation grapples with these issues, the former president’s call for harsher penalties for illegal migrants sets the stage for what promises to be a contentious and closely watched election season. Credit: NYP 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Donald Trump Claims to Be Queen Elizabeth II's Favorite President Amid Controversy
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has recently refuted claims made in an upcoming biography of Queen Elizabeth II, which alleges that he was "very rude" to the late monarch during their meetings. Trump insists that the opposite is true, declaring that he was, in fact, her favorite president. The controversy arose from excerpts of the biography *Voyage Around the Queen* by Craig Brown, currently being serialized in the *Daily Mail*. The book recounts a series of events and interactions between Trump and Queen Elizabeth II, including a particularly striking incident in which the Queen reportedly confided to a guest that she found Trump’s behavior during their meeting to be quite rude. According to the book, she was especially displeased with how Trump seemed distracted, looking over her shoulder as if searching for someone more interesting to engage with. In response to these claims, Trump vehemently denied the characterization of his behavior, telling the *Daily Mail* that he and the Queen actually got along very well during their encounters. "It was totally false. I have no idea who the writer is, but it was really just the opposite," Trump stated in defense of his conduct. He went on to add, "I heard I was her favorite president." The book also suggests that the Queen harbored suspicions about Trump’s personal life, particularly his marriage to Melania Trump. It alleges that the Queen speculated to a guest about the nature of their relationship, wondering aloud if Trump and his wife had some sort of arrangement, given the challenges that their marriage might face. Despite these supposed private doubts, Trump remains confident that he left a positive impression on the Queen and was one of her favored guests. Trump’s interactions with the British Royal Family have often been a subject of media attention and public scrutiny. His admiration for the Royal Family is something he frequently mentions, attributing it to his Scottish mother’s fondness for the monarchy. This affection, however, did not shield him from controversy during his visits to the United Kingdom as president. In 2018, Trump met Queen Elizabeth II during an informal trip to the UK, a visit that sparked widespread protests across London. A year later, during an official state visit, Trump found himself at the center of a minor diplomatic faux pas when he placed his hand on the Queen's back, a gesture that broke royal protocol. Despite this breach of etiquette, Trump praised the Queen, referring to her as a “great, great woman.” As Trump campaigns for a return to the White House in the upcoming November election, his past interactions with international figures, including Queen Elizabeth II, are likely to continue to be a topic of discussion and analysis. While Trump remains confident in the positive nature of his relationship with the late monarch, the differing recollections presented in the biography suggest that the true nature of their interactions may remain a matter of debate. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Mysterious Cooling in the Atlantic Temperature Drop Raises Global Climate Questions
After more than a year of record-high global sea temperatures, a remarkable and puzzling phenomenon has emerged in the equatorial Atlantic. The region is experiencing a dramatic cooling at a pace never before recorded, a shift that could have profound implications for weather patterns across the globe. This rapid transition, dubbed an "Atlantic Niña" pattern, is occurring just as the Pacific Ocean is expected to shift toward a cooler La Niña phase. The occurrence of these two significant cooling events in quick succession has left scientists both intrigued and concerned, as they could potentially trigger ripple effects on global weather. Over the past three months, the equatorial Atlantic Ocean has undergone an astonishing shift from hot to cool temperatures at an unprecedented speed. This sudden cooling marks the emergence of the Atlantic Niña, a pattern that could influence weather worldwide, particularly when combined with the anticipated La Niña in the Pacific. The transition to cooler temperatures in both oceans comes as a relief after an extended period of intense heat on both land and sea, a phenomenon largely attributed to the increasing levels of greenhouse gas emissions and the warm El Niño pattern that began in the tropical Pacific Ocean in mid-2023. "We are starting to see that the global mean ocean temperatures are going down a bit," noted Pedro DiNezio from the University of Colorado Boulder. According to the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), global sea surface temperatures in July 2024 were slightly cooler than those in July 2023, breaking a 15-month streak of record-high average ocean temperatures. This cooling trend began following the fading of the Pacific El Niño in May 2024, and NOAA forecasts suggest that cooler-than-average La Niña conditions are likely to develop between September and November. This development is partly driven by strengthening winds along the equator, which facilitate the emergence of colder water from the deeper ocean. El Niño, in contrast, is associated with weaker trade winds that reduce the upwelling of cooler water, highlighting the cyclical nature of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), one of the key drivers of natural variability within the global climate system. While the Pacific Ocean’s ENSO has a significant influence on global climate, the equatorial Atlantic Ocean also undergoes its own oscillations between warm "Niños" and cold "Niñas" every few years. Similar to ENSO, these fluctuations in the Atlantic are often linked to the strength of trade winds. Throughout much of 2023, the equatorial Atlantic experienced unusually warm Niño conditions, with sea surface temperatures reaching their highest levels in decades. "It’s the latest episode in a string of events for a climate system that’s gone off the rails for a number of years," said Michael McPhaden from NOAA. However, in the last three months, temperatures in this part of the Atlantic have cooled more rapidly than at any other time in recorded history, with data extending back to 1982. This abrupt shift has left scientists baffled, particularly because the strong trade winds typically responsible for such cooling have not materialized. "We’ve gone through the list of possible mechanisms, and nothing checks the box so far," said Franz Philip Tuchen from the University of Miami in Florida, underscoring the mysterious nature of this sudden cooling. If temperatures in the equatorial Atlantic remain 0.5°C cooler than average for at least another month, the phenomenon will officially be classified as an "Atlantic Niña," according to Tuchen. The simultaneous occurrence of two La Niña events—one in the Pacific and the other in the Atlantic—could have significant effects on global weather patterns, particularly through their impact on temperature and humidity. For instance, a Pacific La Niña is generally associated with dry conditions in the western United States and increased rainfall in East Africa, while an Atlantic Niña tends to reduce precipitation in Africa’s Sahel region while increasing it in parts of Brazil. These two La Niñas could also exert opposing influences on the ongoing Atlantic hurricane season. The Pacific La Niña is expected to heighten the likelihood of hurricanes in the Atlantic when it arrives in September, but the Atlantic Niña may weaken certain conditions, such as atmospheric wave activity, which are necessary for hurricane formation. This interaction adds another layer of complexity to predicting how these cooling events will impact global weather. Furthermore, the two cycles might influence each other directly, although the precise nature of their interaction remains difficult to predict. However, there is speculation that the Atlantic Niña could delay the development of the La Niña in the Pacific, thereby slowing its cooling effects on the global climate. "There could be a tug of war between the Pacific trying to cool itself and the Atlantic trying to warm it," McPhaden remarked, highlighting the intricate and interconnected nature of these oceanic cycles. As scientists continue to monitor these developments, the rapid cooling in the Atlantic remains an enigma, raising important questions about the future of global climate patterns and the potential consequences for weather systems worldwide. The unexpected speed of this cooling event, combined with the concurrent shifts in the Pacific, underscores the ongoing challenges in understanding and predicting the complex dynamics of Earth's climate system. Credit: New Scientist 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
70
Thailand's Tourism Surge Threatened by Zero-Dollar Chinese Tours
Revenue from tourism is down. It's been an absolute disgrace to relax all visa rules for Indian tourists and Chinese tourists. I know many quality high spending tourists who are seeking other destinations as Thailand is only looking at cheap mass tourism. -
-
-
.thumb.jpg.b54783ad387f65d779e04f535fcfeee9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now