Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Probably because he's a son-of-a-*****. But he's our son-of-a-*****, as they say. The country didn't fall apart when he was President last time so there is no reason why it should fall apart this time. FFS we have had a dementia patient as President for nearly 4 years and the deep state made all the decisions for the puppet. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 8/14/2024 at 11:58 PM, Mazungu said:

"It is rare for Cabinet members to not support the president they served. They are normally some of a president’s most loyal supporters. But in the case of Trump’s Cabinet, these uniquely qualified insiders — spanning from the vice president and chiefs of staff to more than a dozen agencies, such as Agriculture, Commerce, Homeland Security and Transportation — are deeply divided about whether he should return to power."

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/maddow-blog-half-trump-former-180249206.html

Good question.  And the answer is that they know him best.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

How many former employees are endorsing harris ?

(see below)

 

Such a silly headline.  Most dem will support harris, same as rep supporting trump.  don't won't to piss either off in  case they win.

 

What's the next silly comparison going to be ?

 

How many undocumented / illegal immigrants support Trump ?

 

image.png.94c9b91e8f44003803850354f824995a.png

Edited by KhunLA
  • Confused 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, retarius said:

Probably because he's a son-of-a-*****. But he's our son-of-a-*****, as they say. The country didn't fall apart when he was President last time so there is no reason why it should fall apart this time. FFS we have had a dementia patient as President for nearly 4 years and the deep state made all the decisions for the puppet. 

The more people know Trump, the less they like him.

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

Probably the same staffers that know they won't be invited back if Trump is elected. And know that their fat consulting contracts with Big Business, Big Pharma, and the MIC depend on having a tax and spend (and spend some more) career politician in the White House.  Vivek spilled the beans when he suggested they could dismantle 75% of wasteful gub'ment agencies.

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
Posted

Ah yes, an OP citing the well known and non-partisan Maddow Blog...

 

...anything to deflect from an actual discussion of policy and positions on important issues.  

  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Ah yes, an OP citing the well known and non-partisan Maddow Blog...

 

...anything to deflect from an actual discussion of policy and positions on important issues.  

Go ahead and deflect. I agree you should check a source for intentional bias. But this piece wasn't written by Maddow...and facts aren't biased. A better strategy is to attack the substance. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Mazungu said:

Go ahead and deflect. I agree you should check a source for intentional bias. But this piece wasn't written by Maddow...and facts aren't biased. A better strategy is to attack the substance. 

No, it is republished from her blog at MSNBC.    Written by the producer of the Rachel Maddow Show.  Intentional bias? Yeah. 

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

No, it is republished from her blog at MSNBC.    Written by the producer of the Rachel Maddow Show.  Intentional bias? Yeah. 

Where is the bias? Or can you please dispute the facts?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...