44 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

*Registered Democrat jurors 

Link please.

45 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

You really need to stop believeing everything you read from the mainstream media

He reads MSNBC and The Guardian. All lefties do. Why they don't know anything.

7 minutes ago, maesariang said:

He reads MSNBC and The Guardian. All lefties do. Why they don't know anything.

Another dumb, evidence-free generalization. Frothing much?

Just now, placeholder said:

Another dumb, evidence-free generalization. Frothing much?

You can't even work out percentages. Sad. Go harrass somebody else with your dumb comments.

27 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

He and his cronies said a lot more than that. The riot was clearly planned with the assistance of MAGA minions. He will be convicted in DC, in Florida and in Georgia, but New York gets his criminal ass first.

Yeah yeah, dream on

3 minutes ago, maesariang said:

You can't even work out percentages. Sad. Go harrass somebody else with your dumb comments.

According to you, all lefties follow it MSNBC and the guardian. That's 100%. So unlessyou got a link to back that number up, you might want to look a little bit closer to home for someone who has a problem computing percentages.

Edited September 3, 20242 yr by placeholder

Just now, luckymitchell said:

Yeah yeah, dream on

Why, Pravda isn't covering it for you?

Just now, placeholder said:

According to you, all lefties follow it MSNBC and the guardian. That's 100%. So unlessyou got a link to back that number up, you might want to look a little bit closer to home for someone who has a problem computing percentages.

Go harrass somebody else with your nonsense. I don't care what you think.

Just now, maesariang said:

Go harrass somebody else with your nonsense. I don't care what you think.

And I don't care about your alleged difference. You've got nothing.

I have removed a flame post, resulting to a personal attack.

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

You are stuck on partisan  pedantics. Frankly I don't care, I have been advocating younger candidates for years now, and I think both Trump and Biden are way too old. I wanted him to step aside or be replaced, so I got what I wanted.

 

Unfortunately you're still stuck with the oldest guy to ever run for the office of the presidency. And on top of that he is on a serious downward trajectory, in terms of mental capacity. Which makes him very, very dangerous. 

You are watching a different Trump to the rest of us then. He has done hours worth of interviews and speeches in the last month alone and not a sight of this downward trajectory.

1 minute ago, luckymitchell said:

You are watching a different Trump to the rest of us then. He has done hours worth of interviews and speeches in the last month alone and not a sight of this downward trajectory.

But still plenty of visibility on his criminality.

6 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

A much more important part of the job is not being a complete idiot, and having a handle on what you’re talking about, which Trump obviously doesn’t. Not lying through your teeth every time you open your mouth would also go a long way.

Well then she fails because she wont even do the easy part..answering questions.

8 hours ago, wwest5829 said:

jurist. noun. ju·rist ˈju̇r-ist. : an individual having a thorough knowledge of law.

You arent an American either

10 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

But still plenty of visibility on his criminality.

In your eyes maybe

10 hours ago, paddypower said:

Trump hasn't had a real job, since his racist slum landlord Dad gave him a couple of hundred million and sent him on his way.

Neither has Kamala, since her corrupt Democratic machine lover gave her a job and a BMW and sent her on her way

9 hours ago, RocketDog said:

I dislike Kim Jong Un and putin but I don't live in Korea or Russia.

Is that OK with you?

Do you go on Russian message Boards and trash Putin?

8 hours ago, wwest5829 said:

jurist. noun. ju·rist ˈju̇r-ist. : an individual having a thorough knowledge of law.

Better check the usage, not the dictionary. But if you need to use a dictionary on the word, you arent an American

9 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Rambling is not talking.

Silence is not talking. 

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Better check the usage, not the dictionary. But if you need to use a dictionary on the word, you arent an American

Thanks for offering no evidence to support your claim. After all, who are we to trust? Experts on language or an anonymous member of aseanow.com?

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Thanks for offering no evidence to support your claim. After all, who are we to trust? Experts on language or an anonymous member of aseanow.com?

Dont need evidence when I have tons of Americans who use the term. Jurists here are judges, and if you think not, when the cop pulls you over ID yourself as a jurist because you read a book on law. Then you can meet a real jurist.

 

Americans dont call AGs jurists. Think what you want.

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Dont need evidence when I have tons of Americans who use the term. Jurists here are judges, and if you think not, when the cop pulls you over ID yourself as a jurist because you read a book on law. Then you can meet a real jurist.

 

Americans dont call AGs jurists. Think what you want.

For a minute there, I thought you were going to introduce evidence and not just double down on your unsupported assertion. I should have known better.

Thank you self-appointed spokesman for speakers of American English everywhere.

Edited September 3, 20242 yr by placeholder

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

For a minute there, I thought you were going to introduce evidence and not just double down on your unsupported assertion. I should have known better.

Thank you self-appointed spokesman for speakers of American English everywhere.

Your welcome. Glad I can enlighten you. Try not to use "jurist" in a sentence that does not to refer to a Judge, it marks you as a falang.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Your welcome. Glad I can enlighten you. Try not to use "jurist" in a sentence that does not to refer to a Judge, it marks you as a falang.

Another empty assertion. Are you familiar with the rules of this forum that require assertions of fact to be backed by a link to a credible source? Rational folk consider dictionaries to be such a source. 

23 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Another empty assertion. Are you familiar with the rules of this forum that require assertions of fact to be backed by a link to a credible source? Rational folk consider dictionaries to be such a source. 

Well why dont you just complain, after all, stopping speech you dont like is what your lot does. Notice the Britishism there?

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well why dont you just complain, after all, stopping speech you dont like is what your lot does. Notice the Britishism there?

I got news for you. This forum doesn't countenance unbridled free speech. And a good thing too. Otherwise, among other misfortunes,it would be overrun with people who make empty contrary to fact assertions citing themselves as authorities. There's a good reason the the rule stipulates links to credible sources. Your philological assertion would be better placed in the fiction forum.

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I got news for you. This forum doesn't countenance unbridled free speech. And a good thing too. Otherwise, among other misfortunes,it would be overrun with people who make empty contrary to fact assertions citing themselves as authorities. There's a good reason the the rule stipulates links to credible sources. Your philological assertion would be better placed in the fiction forum.

Well clearly it only allows free speech to the anti Trump crowd, thats pretty obvious

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

And I don't care about your alleged difference. You've got nothing.

You shouldn't have too high expectations. It's Bignok! 😀

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well clearly it only allows free speech to the anti Trump crowd, thats pretty obvious

Not obvious to me who has occasionally experienced such censorship which is their right to exercise. And if they were to allow people such as yourself to make unsupported assertions repeatedly, these pages would be abandoned by sensible people. I suggest you publish your assertions in the Journal of Because I Said So.

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

Not obvious to me who has occasionally experienced such censorship which is their right to exercise. And if they were to allow people such as yourself to make unsupported assertions repeatedly, these pages would be abandoned by sensible people. I suggest you publish your assertions in the Journal of Because I Said So.

Your pedantic overreaction to a correction based on American English usage seems a bit much, perhaps you need to engage in petty wars to satisfy some ego need.

 

But hey based on the dictionary Im an esteemed jurist, like Kamala Harris, except I didnt sleep with an elderly machine politician to further my career.