Trump: “There Will Be No Third Debate!”

[RSD1]

Sounds like the old codger has come to his senses and is calling it quits. Most likely he's worried about another debate loss and doesn't want to wreck another one of his gold dipped diapers in the process. What a shame, I was really looking forward to Kamala triggering and tying him up in knots again. Meanwhile, Harris said she would welcome a second debate (according to the Yahoo link below). This further reaffirms who won and who lost. From Trump’s Truth Social post linked below: “THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE!

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113126153368079486

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-harris-second-2024-presidential-debate/
 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-wont-debate-harris-135741008.html
 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-says-wont-participate-presidential-debates-harris-rcna170905

 

Edited September 13 by RSD1

[bannork]

The coward knows he's no match for the woman he described as dumb as a rock.

[Jingthing]

^{Something to watch for now.}

^{He probably realizes there is a good chance he will lose now and not be able to illegally overturn the election as he tried to do before.}

^{So if that happens, he would want sympathy from President Harris for pardons.}

^{Going forward watch if he starts to personally insult Harris less than before.}

^{He can't call her dumb anymore for example.} 

[RSD1]

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

^{Something to watch for now.}

^{He probably realizes there is a good chance he will lose now and not be able to illegally overturn the election as he tried to do before.}

^{So if that happens, he would want sympathy from President Harris for pardons.}

^{Going forward watch if he starts to personally insult Harris less than before.}

^{He can't call her dumb anymore for example.} 

I think there is a very good chance that Harris will pardon him to help end divisions and reunite the country. It’s most likely his best play at this point. 

[FriscoKid]

What a shame. I was looking forward to a bit more debate porn. 

[still kicking]

1 minute ago, FriscoKid said:

What a shame. I was looking forward to a bit more debate porn. 

Porn is illegal in LOS

[Jeff Reinstad]

16 minutes ago, still kicking said:

Porn is illegal in LOS

 

 

'Debate porn' is just a figure of speech used by native English speakers.

[still kicking]

3 minutes ago, Jeff Reinstad said:

 

 

'Debate porn' is just a figure of speech used by native English speakers.

I know I was only teasing the poster.

[G_Money]

He’s already won two.  Besides,  Harris wouldn’t agree to Trumps terms anyway.   
 

In which he would have every right to dictate terms and the network broadcasting as Biden /Harris had the last two.

 

Not surprised.  Liberals want everything their way or not at all.

 

 

 

[farang51]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

In which he would have every right to dictate terms and the network broadcasting as Biden /Harris had the last two.

 

 

 

Are you saying Biden and Harris are better at making a deal than Trump?

Edited September 13 by farang51

[RSD1]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

He’s already won two.  Besides,  Harris wouldn’t agree to Trumps terms anyway.   
 

In which he would have every right to dictate terms and the network broadcasting as Biden /Harris had the last two.

 

Not surprised.  Liberals want everything their way or not at all.

Deluded pulp fiction.

[G_Money]

21 minutes ago, farang51 said:

Are you saying Biden and Harris are better at making a deal than Trump?

 Not at all.

 

The liberal crybabies won’t debate unless it’s on their terms.  Twice in a row now.  Both times 3 against 1.  

 

What’s up with that shi-!

 

So cowardly.  Trump accepted the snowflakes terms but they won’t agree to his terms even though it’s his turn (overdue) to dictate terms.

 

Why won’t they agree to Trump’s terms?  

[G_Money]

6 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

Deluded pulp fiction.

What is fiction about it?

 

Trump had to agree to THEIR terms or no debate.

 

Classic liberal whining.

[farang51]

6 minutes ago, G_Money said:

So cowardly.  Trump accepted the snowflakes terms but they won’t agree to his terms even though it’s his turn (overdue) to dictate terms.

So, they were better at making a deal than Trump.

[G_Money]

10 minutes ago, farang51 said:

So, they were better at making a deal than Trump.

Read the post above yours.

[farang51]

2 minutes ago, G_Money said:

13 minutes ago, farang51 said:

So, they were better at making a deal than Trump.

Read the post above yours.

Trump didn't have to agree to anything if he didn't want to. He knows better than most "when to walk away from the table", according to his book.

[G_Money]

4 minutes ago, farang51 said:

Trump didn't have to agree to anything if he didn't want to. He knows better than most "when to walk away from the table", according to his book.

They would not debate him on his terms.  So he complied to their terms.  At least he engaged and didn’t walk away.  

 

Do you think Harris will comply to his terms if there was another debate?  I think not.  She knows the payback in a biased network and mods would be too much for her to handle.  She’ll walk away.

[farang51]

6 minutes ago, G_Money said:

They would not debate him on his terms.  So he complied to their terms.  At least he engaged and didn’t walk away.  

That is the way you make a deal. If you feel that he got a bad deal, then you have to accept that he is not the best at making deals. You cannot have it both ways. Personally, I do not think he got a bad deal; but he surely bombed at the debate. Not because of the deal but because he is who he is.

 

8 minutes ago, G_Money said:

 

Do you think Harris will comply to his terms if there was another debate?  I think not.  She knows the payback in a biased network and mods would be too much for her to handle.  She’ll walk away.

 

So far, she has offered a new debate; he is the one walking away without even trying to make a deal. Understandable, I wouldn't want another clobbering either, if it was me. He may change his mind, though, when new polls show him behind in the swing states.

[G_Money]

15 minutes ago, farang51 said:

That is the way you make a deal. If you feel that he got a bad deal, then you have to accept that he is not the best at making deals. You cannot have it both ways. Personally, I do not think he got a bad deal; but he surely bombed at the debate. Not because of the deal but because he is who he is.

 

 

So far, she has offered a new debate; he is the one walking away without even trying to make a deal. Understandable, I wouldn't want another clobbering either, if it was me. He may change his mind, though, when new polls show him behind in the swing states.

We certainly have different opinions.  I’m sticking with mine.

 

I guarantee she would not agree to a Trump terms debate.  You know that as well.

 

Let’s say Fox network.  Hannity and Meagan Kelly as mods.  I think that’s fair given the past two debates Trump had.

 

Do you agree that would be fair?

Edited September 13 by G_Money

[RSD1]

14 minutes ago, farang51 said:

He may change his mind, though, when new polls show him behind in the swing states.

I agree, he's desperate for eyeballs. "No I won't, yes I will, maybe, NO, OK, fine!" He's just playing games. He will certainly come around once there is an opportunity, regardless of good deal or bad deal in his mind. He won't walk away. He can't help himself, even though he will get crushed again. He surely won't pick up any new voters, but his ego thrives on all the shoulder pats he gets from his old base. Trump is obsessed with Trump. 

 

 

[farang51]

26 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Let’s say Fox network.  Hannity and Meagan Kelly as mods.  I think that’s fair given the past two debates Trump had.

 

Do you agree that would be fair?

Despite what you believe, the moderaters in the past debates have been neutral, not only in the last two debates but going back many years. There will always be some viewers - on both sides - that believes the moderaters should have asked question they didn't ask or that they should have behaved different. But generally, they have been neutral.

 

A debate on Fox with opinion hosts will not be neutral. There may be hosts from the news side of Fox that can be neutral, but certainly not an opinion host like Hannity.

[stoner]

3 hours ago, Jeff Reinstad said:

4 hours ago, still kicking said:

Porn is illegal in LOS

 

 

'Debate porn' is just a figure of speech used by native English speakers.

 

jealous much ? it was a great one liner. 

[G_Money]

11 minutes ago, farang51 said:

Despite what you believe, the moderaters in the past debates have been neutral, not only in the last two debates but going back many years. There will always be some viewers - on both sides - that believes the moderaters should have asked question they didn't ask or that they should have behaved different. But generally, they have been neutral.

 

A debate on Fox with opinion hosts will not be neutral. There may be hosts from the news side of Fox that can be neutral, but certainly not an opinion host like Hannity.

Neutral? In the past two debates!

 

Thank you for showing your true ignorance.

 

No need for further clarification.

[RSD1]

52 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Let’s say Fox network.  Hannity and Meagan Kelly as mods

Lol. They are like cartoon characters. In that case let's have a real rodeo and get Russel Brand, Piers Morgan and Tucker Carlson to do it. 🤮🤣

[G_Money]

19 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

Lol. They are like cartoon characters. In that case let's have a real rodeo and get Russel Brand, Piers Morgan and Tucker Carlson to do it. 🤮🤣

“They are like cartoon characters“

 

In what way?  
 

Did you see the freak show at the DNC?  A true three ring circus.

[GammaGlobulin]

5 hours ago, RSD1 said:

Most likely he's worried about another debate loss

 

He won.

 

Trump is a winner.

 

He will always win.

And, he will win in November, too.

 

Mark my words.

 

 

[G_Money]

As I and several others have said before.  Completely biased debate.  Even Davis admits.

 

 

[RSD1]

20 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

He won.

 

Trump is a winner.

 

He will always win.

And, he will win in November, too.

 

Mark my words.

 

Always a winner?

 

Really? 
 

How about all his failed businesses?

 

How about all the bankruptcies?

 

How about the nearly $500 million in losses for penalties in the courts? 
 

How about being guilty of 34 criminal charges?

 

How about being guilty of being a sexual

offender?

How about being criminally indicted 4 times? 
 

How about being impeached twice?
 

And how about that loss to Biden in 2020?

 

OK, GG Lichtman, I've marked your words, but not in the way you are hoping. 

 

 

 

Edited September 13 by RSD1

[RSD1]

5 minutes ago, G_Money said:

As I and several others have said before.  Completely biased debate.  Even Davis admits.

 

 

I always find it entertaining how Trump apologizers only ever have one media source that they reference; The Fox News Comedy Channel. 😂

[GammaGlobulin]

55 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

 

Always a winner?

 

Really? 
 

How about all his failed businesses?

 

How about all the bankruptcies?

 

How about the nearly $500 million in losses for penalties in the courts? 
 

How about being guilty of 34 criminal charges?

 

How about being guilty of being a sexual

offender?

How about being criminally indicted 4 times? 
 

How about being impeached twice?
 

And how about that loss to Biden in 2020?

 

OK, GG Lichtman, I've marked your words, but not in the way you are hoping. 

 

 

 

 

You obviously have a slightly different point of view than I.

 

Trump is a winner.

 

And, Americans LOVE a Winner.

 

This is why.....

Trump....

Will Win.....Again....

In November.