All 14 Defendants in Tak Bai Massacre Cases Flee Country, Senate Committee Reports

[Social Media]

 

Former President Barack Obama, often seen as a guiding figure within the Democratic Party, recently made comments that once again underscore the party’s uneasy relationship with the Black electorate. During a surprise campaign stop in Pittsburgh, Obama expressed frustration with what he perceived as a reluctance among some Black men to fully support Vice President Kamala Harris. According to Obama, this hesitancy stems from misogyny, as he claimed that Black men “just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president” and are hiding behind “other alternatives and other reasons for that.”

 

This isn’t the first time Democratic politicians have placed responsibility on Black voters for perceived lack of support. While Obama’s frustration with Black men was clear, recent polls indicate that his criticism might be misplaced. In fact, support for Harris among Black voters remains consistent, if not stronger, than it was for President Joe Biden before he withdrew from the race in July. Rather than focusing on Black voters, some suggest that Obama should direct his attention toward Latino men, whose support for Harris has been notably lukewarm.

 

The issue, however, runs deeper than one election cycle or one group of voters. The Democratic Party has long expected unwavering loyalty from Black voters, often without offering substantial policies that address their concerns. This dynamic has been in place since Bill Clinton’s infamous “Sista Souljah Moment” during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. In an attempt to appeal to white voters, Clinton drew an unfair equivalence between the Black rapper Sista Souljah and former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, using her comments to portray Black anger as equivalent to systemic racism. 

 

Obama’s recent comments fit within this long-standing pattern. Like Clinton, Obama’s criticism seems to imply that the Black community, particularly Black men, bears responsibility for its own struggles, even in the face of systemic issues. Both leaders have resorted to what can be described as “respectability politics,” a tactic that overgeneralizes and blames cultural issues within the Black community while downplaying the larger structural forces of racism that continue to impact their lives — even from within the Democratic Party.

 

This type of rhetoric, aimed at Black voters, is particularly troubling when it comes from Black leaders themselves. Obama’s 2013 keynote speech at Morehouse College, an all-male historically Black institution, serves as a prime example. In his address, Obama told the graduates, “We know that too many young men in our community continue to make bad choices… Well, we’ve got no time for excuses.” This message of personal responsibility mirrored President Clinton’s speech on welfare reform in 1995, and both speeches failed to address the systemic forces at play, instead placing the onus on Black men to overcome deep-rooted societal issues on their own.

 

Vice President Harris, for her part, has attempted to engage Black men with her own set of initiatives. At a campaign stop in Erie, Pennsylvania, Harris unveiled a plan that promised loans and financial incentives aimed at supporting Black men. Yet, much like Obama’s criticism, her initiatives were largely symbolic and failed to meaningfully address the unique challenges that Black men face. For instance, her plan’s emphasis on the federal legalization of marijuana may seem progressive, but in reality, the primary beneficiaries of such policies have been white men, leaving many Black men behind. 

 

Harris’s gestures, like Obama’s remarks, reflect the broader issue within the Democratic Party: the expectation that Black voters will fall in line, no matter how limited or ineffective the party’s policies are in addressing their needs. The assumption that Black men need to be convinced to vote, or that they should be chastised for considering other options, fails to recognize the legitimate concerns many have about their place within a system that often marginalizes them.

 

Ultimately, Obama’s comments and Harris’s pandering represent a broader issue of hubris within the Democratic Party. The party continues to rely heavily on Black voters, particularly Black women, as one of its most loyal voting blocs, while offering little in return beyond symbolic gestures and moralistic scolding. As the party looks toward the future, it may need to reassess its relationship with Black voters, or risk further alienating a group that has long been vital to its success.

 

Based on a report from the Hill 2024-10-23