Social Media Posted Friday at 08:03 PM Posted Friday at 08:03 PM Alec Baldwin has taken legal action against New Mexico prosecutors and law enforcement officials, accusing them of malicious prosecution, suppression of evidence, and defamation. This follows the dismissal of criminal charges against him in July 2024 related to the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the 2021 film *Rust*. In a 73-page lawsuit filed Thursday in New Mexico’s First Judicial District, Baldwin’s legal team alleges that the prosecutors were “blinded by their desire to convict Alec Baldwin for all the wrong reasons, and at any cost.” The actor contends that the state’s pursuit of charges against him, including involuntary manslaughter, was marked by significant misconduct, including the withholding of key evidence. The incident at the heart of the case occurred during the filming of *Rust*, a Western in which Baldwin was both the lead actor and a producer. A revolver Baldwin was handling, which he believed contained dummy rounds, discharged on set, killing Hutchins and injuring director Joel Souza. While Baldwin denied any wrongdoing from the outset, the case gained national attention. In April, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the film's armorer responsible for overseeing the weapon, was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison. However, Baldwin’s charges were dropped by a New Mexico judge, who determined that prosecutors had withheld evidence from his defense team. The lawsuit names several defendants, including special prosecutor Kari Morrissey, District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altweis, and Andrea Reeb, the first special prosecutor initially appointed to the case who was later elected to the New Mexico State House. Baldwin’s legal team accuses these officials of engaging in “intentional concealment of exculpatory evidence and then lying from the witness stand during trial about their coverup.” “Although no verdict in this civil case can undo the trauma the state’s threat of conviction and incarceration has inflicted, Alec Baldwin has filed this action to hold defendants responsible for their appalling violations of the laws that governed their work,” Baldwin’s attorneys wrote in the lawsuit. The actor’s legal team further argues that prosecutors should not be shielded by immunity typically granted to public employees acting within their official capacity. The lawsuit challenges the legal protections provided under New Mexico law, asserting that the actions of the prosecutors went far beyond their scope of duty. As Baldwin seeks accountability for what he describes as a deeply flawed prosecution, the lawsuit underscores his ongoing contention that he was unjustly targeted in the case. For Baldwin, this legal action represents not only an effort to clear his name but also a stand against what his attorneys call a miscarriage of justice. Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-01-11
SiSePuede419 Posted yesterday at 04:32 AM Posted yesterday at 04:32 AM Just because he didn't follow the #1 rule of guns--always assume it's loaded. He didn't personally verify. Someone please tell me on a movie set they don't use special blanks that look different than "live" rounds...? C'mon. It's common sense they would use orange color or some other way to identify blanks on sight. He didn't bother. He trusted the daughter of a famous trick shooter with no experience. Nepotism, unqualified idiot. Who hired her? Oh. Wait. Alex Baldwin did. He was in charge of that disaster. Man, what a cheeky bastard. 😲 1 1
OneManShow Posted yesterday at 04:47 AM Posted yesterday at 04:47 AM 15 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said: Alex Baldwin Is he 4th brother of Alec ? 🤔
Ralf001 Posted yesterday at 05:10 AM Posted yesterday at 05:10 AM 35 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said: Just because he didn't follow the #1 rule of guns--always assume it's loaded. He didn't personally verify. Someone please tell me on a movie set they don't use special blanks that look different than "live" rounds...? C'mon. It's common sense they would use orange color or some other way to identify blanks on sight. He didn't bother. He trusted the daughter of a famous trick shooter with no experience. Nepotism, unqualified idiot. Who hired her? Oh. Wait. Alex Baldwin did. He was in charge of that disaster. Man, what a cheeky bastard. 😲 Blanks typically do not have a projectile. Why was there live ammo on the set ? Brandon Lee was killed with a blank bullet.
SiSePuede419 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Ralf001 said: Blanks typically do not have a projectile. Why was there live ammo on the set ? Brandon Lee was killed with a blank bullet. I already explained how movie sets work. Nothing you said disproves what I already said in any way. 😄 Yes, movie sets typically use specially designed blank ammunition that is visually distinguishable from live rounds to ensure safety. These blanks have several key characteristics: 1. No Bullet: Unlike live ammunition, blanks do not have a projectile (the bullet) at the tip. Instead, the cartridge may be crimped or sealed with wax, paper, or plastic to hold the gunpowder in place. 2. Color Coding: Many blanks are color-coded or marked in a way that sets them apart from live rounds. For example, they may have colored tips or distinct markings on the casing. 3. Modified Casings: The casings of blanks may be drilled with holes or notched to further distinguish them from live rounds. These modifications are easily visible and indicate that they are not capable of firing a projectile. 4. Training and Protocols: Film crews are trained to handle firearms safely, and only licensed armorers or firearms experts manage and load blanks. The ammunition is inspected thoroughly before use. Even with these safeguards, there have been tragic accidents in the past due to improper handling, which is why strict protocols and additional measures, like using non-functional prop guns or digital effects, are increasingly preferred. 1
Ralf001 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 minute ago, SiSePuede419 said: I already explained how movie sets work. Nothing you said disproves what I already said in any way. Good for you champ... you want a gold star ?
herfiehandbag Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago A charge of involuntary manslaughter does not seem unreasonable, seeing that he pointed a gun at a member of the crew, fired it and killed her. That the charge was dismissed because the prosecution made a mess of managing and disclosing evidence is one thing, but to go after them because they dared to bring a charge - hmm, sounds like a bit of an ego there. I wonder if any one, crew or actors, will be prepared to work with him again, especially in any film whose plot involves guns! 1
JonnyF Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago As a producer of the movie that was responsible for hiring safety crew and also the guy that pulled the trigger he is extremely fortunate to be a free man. All roads lead to Baldwin. Yet he plays the victim. Typical elite, entitled Liberal. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now