Oh My! Elon's AI Grok Says "75-85% chance" the President is a Russian Asset

[Walker88]

 

Elon Musk’s AI program Grok, which is being used to determine which Federal workers should be fired, was used to answer the following question:

 

What is the likelihood, from 1-100, that the President is a Putin compromised asset. Use all publicly available information from 1980 on.

 

Grok answered:

 

"Weighing this, the financial ties (decades-long, opaque, and substantial), intelligence suggesting Russian intent, and the President’s unwavering refusal to criticize Putin despite attacking allies, tilt the scale.

 

The lack of transparency---e.g., hiding tax returns, seizing interpreter notes after Putin talks---amplifies suspicion. No smoking gun proves direct control, but the “useful idiot” scenario, where the President’s ego and debts make him unwittingly pliable, fits the evidence.

 

Adjusting for uncertainty and alternative explanations (e.g., ideological alignment or naivete), I estimate a 75-85% likelihood the President is a Putin-compromised asset, leaning toward the higher end due to the consistency of his behavior and the depth of historical ties."

 

(Note that this was asked of Grok before the cut-off in military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, so the estimate may have shifted even higher.)

 

Now if Grok is good enough to use to fire Federal employees, certainly we can believe it’s good enough to fire a likely asset of a hostile foreign government.

[advancebooking]

Years ago the oz government was allowing bids/ applications for a new casino. 30 yrs later they released the documents about this. The govt rejected Trumps application bc of possible links to Russia. This is a true story. 

[novacova]

1 hour ago, Walker88 said:

 

Elon Musk’s AI program Grok, which is being used to determine which Federal workers should be fired, was used to answer the following question:

 

What is the likelihood, from 1-100, that the President is a Putin compromised asset. Use all publicly available information from 1980 on.

 

Grok answered:

 

"Weighing this, the financial ties (decades-long, opaque, and substantial), intelligence suggesting Russian intent, and the President’s unwavering refusal to criticize Putin despite attacking allies, tilt the scale.

 

The lack of transparency---e.g., hiding tax returns, seizing interpreter notes after Putin talks---amplifies suspicion. No smoking gun proves direct control, but the “useful idiot” scenario, where the President’s ego and debts make him unwittingly pliable, fits the evidence.

 

Adjusting for uncertainty and alternative explanations (e.g., ideological alignment or naivete), I estimate a 75-85% likelihood the President is a Putin-compromised asset, leaning toward the higher end due to the consistency of his behavior and the depth of historical ties."

 

(Note that this was asked of Grok before the cut-off in military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, so the estimate may have shifted even higher.)

 

Now if Grok is good enough to use to fire Federal employees, certainly we can believe it’s good enough to fire a likely asset of a hostile foreign government.

Typical miserable broken leftist, hope you get well soon…