Report No Border Closure: Thailand, Cambodia Pursue Diplomatic Path Forward

[webfact]

Picture courtesy of Wikipedia

 

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra reassured the nation that the tense situation at the Thai-Cambodian border is gradually improving. On Tuesday, June 10, she confirmed no confrontations have arisen between the two nations. Border checkpoint opening and closing schedules remain unchanged as both countries aim to ease tensions collaboratively.

 

The Prime Minister highlighted the robust communication between Thailand and Cambodia under international law.

 

She has engaged with Cambodian counterparts, including Prime Minister Hun Manet and Senate President Hun Sen, to safeguard national interests. These discussions have been peaceful, with both parties striving for harmony.

 

Contrary to swirling rumours, Paetongtarn dismissed the notion of permanently closing the border, stressing the detrimental impact this would have on cross-border trade. Instead, timing adjustments at checkpoints are intended to minimise disruptions.

 

The upcoming Joint Boundary Commission (JBC) meeting on June 14 is anticipated to facilitate further progress.

 

While the possibility of taking the issue to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) looms, Paetongtarn reinforced Thailand's rejection of the ICJ's jurisdiction.

 

The Thai government continues its transparent yet discreet diplomatic approach. Though confidentiality limits public disclosure, both nations have reached a private understanding, ensuring regional stability.

 

In conclusion, the Thai-Cambodian border situation is being managed diplomatically, with vital discussions scheduled to continue. The avoidance of permanent closure indicates a focus on maintaining crucial trade relations while addressing security concerns.

 

The forthcoming JBC meeting will be crucial in determining further steps to sustain peace and prosperity between the two neighbouring countries.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Nation 2025-06-11

 

 

[Seagull Sam]

Forgive my possible ignorance but what point is there in either party escalating a minor dispute over the equivalent of a garden fence?