video screenshot

 

In a stunning move, President Donald Trump has deployed federalised National Guard troops along Washington, D.C.'s National Mall, overnight. This unexpected military spectacle aims to tackle rising crime in the city, according to a source close to the initiative.

 

The operation, beginning overnight and lasting until Thursday morning, is set to reveal a significant military presence, catching both locals and tourists by surprise amidst the museums and monuments. Although historically reserved for inaugurations or emergencies, like the 1992 Los Angeles riots, this mobilisation raises eyebrows due to its dramatic statement on home soil, reported ABC News.

 

Colonel Dave Butler of the Army stated that the Army's role includes providing logistical support and ensuring visibility across key locations. The White House confirmed a substantial deployment that ramped up through the night. This action, as announced by Trump, involves some 800 troops engaging to curb what he branded as "out of control" crime and taking control of the police force.

 

Despite the impressive number of troops, residents are unlikely to see all 800 deployed in their area. Instead, shifts of 100 to 200 will manage duties ranging from logistics to direct law enforcement support, echoing strategies used during critical events like the January 6 riots.

 

Army Col. Larry Doane leads a joint task force that manages this remarkable move. The National Park Service, with its jurisdiction over the Mall, is also involved in this operation, combining military presence with law enforcement aid. The implications are vast, with D.C.'s serene tourist spots now serving as a backdrop for combatting urban issues.

 

This deployment raises questions about its long-term impact and whether such dramatic measures affect the public's perception of safety and authority in the capital. Eyes will remain fixed on how events unfold as tourists and residents awaken to this bold show of force.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from ABC News 2025-08-14

 

So in 2020 Trump blamed Nancy Pelosi for not calling in the National Guard to end the Capitol riots, and said he didn’t have the authority to do that. And what do you know, it turns out Trump does have the authority to deploy the National Guard after all. Lying sack of <deleted>. And not a peep from MAGA, who defended Trump when he said he didn’t have the authority to do this in 2020. Double standard hypocrites, every last one of them.

If they deploy them to the epicentre of the criminal activity, the White House will need a bigger car park.

1 hour ago, rudi49jr said:

So in 2020 Trump blamed Nancy Pelosi for not calling in the National Guard to end the Capitol riots, and said he didn’t have the authority to do that. And what do you know, it turns out Trump does have the authority to deploy the National Guard after all. Lying sack of sh!t. And not a peep from MAGA, who defended Trump when he said he didn’t have the authority to do this in 2020. Double standard hypocrites, every last one of them.

Blissful ignorance. The Capitol area itself is under the jurisdiction of the Speaker who on January 6th was Nancy Pelosi. The area outside of the Capitol does indeed come under the purview of the President hence in both cases Trump was observing constitutional requirements.

26 minutes ago, poyai111 said:

Blissful ignorance. The Capitol area itself is under the jurisdiction of the Speaker who on January 6th was Nancy Pelosi. The area outside of the Capitol does indeed come under the purview of the President hence in both cases Trump was observing constitutional requirements.

Sometimes you think the MAGA cult has reached its epitome of hypocrisy and weirdness.  Then once again they rise further to another cult lie that ignores reality and facts. 

3 hours ago, animalmagic said:

If they deploy them to the epicentre of the criminal activity, the White House will need a bigger car park.

Maybe dig a moat around the WH, fly in a couple dozen alligators and create a mini alligator alcatraz for the resident lawbreakers.

4 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

Maybe dig a moat around the WH, fly in a couple dozen alligators and create a mini alligator alcatraz for the resident lawbreakers.

I think in this case the predators will be on the inside!

2 hours ago, Wake Up1 said:

Sometimes you think the MAGA cult has reached its epitome of hypocrisy and weirdness.  Then once again they rise further to another cult lie that ignores reality and facts. 

 

Sometimes you wonder if Democrats have the brains to follow clear precedent. The Speaker is the third most powerful person in the US political system and they alone control the curtilage of Congress. 

 

Presidents can only attend Congress at the invitation of the Speaker. 

 

The Speaker controls the House of Representatives - not the President - and no one else. 

 

44 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

Sometimes you wonder if Democrats have the brains to follow clear precedent. The Speaker is the third most powerful person in the US political system and they alone control the curtilage of Congress. 

 

Presidents can only attend Congress at the invitation of the Speaker. 

 

The Speaker controls the House of Representatives - not the President - and no one else. 

Sometimes you have to wonder if the maggots understand an obvious intimidation tactic and a dress rehearsal for trumps next coup…….or perhaps they do hate democracy and rule of law.this clown show is theater and rehearsal no more no less he’s stepping on toes because he can,it’s theater.

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

Sometimes you wonder if Democrats have the brains to follow clear precedent. The Speaker is the third most powerful person in the US political system and they alone control the curtilage of Congress. 

 

Presidents can only attend Congress at the invitation of the Speaker. 

 

The Speaker controls the House of Representatives - not the President - and no one else. 

I don’t wonder — your blether shows you don’t have the brains to even understand what the precedent is, and it’s not built on some recycled Jan 6th blame Pelosi fantasy.

I could explain it to you, but that would be pointless — I can’t understand it for you.

The burden of proof is yours.

Here we have two attempts to undermine what I said and they are both equally stupid. 

 

The Speaker controls Congress and Congressional property. Full stop. 

 

The President has ultimate control over the Federated land in DC outside of the Congressional curtilage. Full stop. 

 

Don't bother arguing - you'll only make mugs of yourselves. 

And while Dems go into another rage spiral about DC not being the most dangerous city in the USA - and I agree - every other city has an overarching governor, never mind a local mayor. 

 

DC does not have a governor. Once again - full stop. 

 

If you are going to argue, argue from a position of Constitutional truth and don't make fools of yourselves. 

42 minutes ago, Tug said:

Sometimes you have to wonder if the maggots understand an obvious intimidation tactic and a dress rehearsal for trumps next coup…….or perhaps they do hate democracy and rule of law.this clown show is theater and rehearsal no more no less he’s stepping on toes because he can,it’s theater.

 

Talk to me like an idiot and I'll prove you are an idiot - here you go. 

 

The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is a pivotal figure in Congress, with significant control over House operations and specific responsibilities related to security, particularly for the Capitol and its grounds. Below is a clear explanation of why the Speaker holds this authority and the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, grounded in the provided sources and general knowledge of U.S. government structure.Why the Speaker Controls CongressThe Speaker of the House is the presiding officer of the House of Representatives, a role established by the U.S. Constitution and further defined by House rules and federal statutes. The Speaker’s control over Congress, specifically the House, stems from their constitutional, institutional, and partisan roles:Constitutional Basis:

The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, states: “The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” This clause establishes the Speaker as the elected leader of the House, chosen by its members, typically from the majority party, to oversee its operations.

While the Constitution does not explicitly detail the Speaker’s powers, it grants the House authority to determine its own rules and proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings…”). Through these rules, the Speaker is vested with significant authority to manage House business.

Institutional Role:

The Speaker is the administrative head of the House, responsible for maintaining order, managing proceedings, and governing its business. This includes controlling the order of business on the House floor, appointing members to committees, and referring legislation to appropriate committees.

The Speaker acts as a negotiator between the House, the President, and the Senate, playing a key role in advancing the House’s legislative agenda, including its “power of the purse” (originating revenue bills and appropriating funds, per Article I, Section 7).

Partisan Role:

As the de facto leader of the majority party in the House, the Speaker shapes the legislative priorities and ensures party discipline. This role enhances their influence over House activities, as they align the chamber’s agenda with the majority party’s goals.

Presiding Officer:

The Speaker presides over House sessions, though they often delegate this duty to other members. They maintain order, recognize members to speak, and rule on procedural matters, ensuring the House functions smoothly.

 

Take particular note: 

 

Security Responsibilities of the SpeakerThe Speaker’s role in Capitol security is derived from House rules, federal statutes, and their oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms, who is directly responsible for maintaining security within the House chamber and Capitol complex. Here’s a detailed breakdown:Oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms:

 

The Speaker appoints and oversees the House Sergeant at Arms, one of the “other Officers” referenced in Article I, Section 2, Clause 5. The Sergeant at Arms is responsible for maintaining order and security in the House chamber, galleries, and Capitol buildings, as well as protecting members, staff, and visitors.

The Sergeant at Arms works under the Speaker’s direction to execute security protocols, including coordinating with the U.S. Capitol Police. Posts on X and some sources indicate that the Speaker’s authority extends to approving or denying additional security measures, such as National Guard deployment, though this is typically done in consultation with other congressional leaders.

 

Capitol Police Board:

 

The Speaker is a member of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the U.S. Capitol Police. The board, established under 2 U.S.C. § 1961, includes the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the Architect of the Capitol. The Speaker’s role on this board gives them significant influence over Capitol security policies and operations.

 

The Capitol Police are tasked with protecting the Capitol complex, including the House and Senate chambers, under the board’s direction. The Speaker’s authority here is not absolute, as decisions are made collectively, but their position as House leader amplifies their influence.

 

Statutory Authority:

 

The Speaker’s security responsibilities are codified in federal law, particularly through the rules governing the Capitol Police and the Sergeant at Arms. For example, 2 U.S.C. § 1974 authorizes the Capitol Police Board, chaired by a member chosen by the Speaker and Senate leadership, to make security-related decisions. Additionally, House Rule I, Clause 3, assigns the Speaker the duty to “preserve order and decorum” in the House, which extends to security oversight.

 

The Speaker is second in the line of presidential succession after the Vice President, as established by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. § 19). This underscores their critical role in national governance and justifies their involvement in security matters, as the Capitol’s safety directly affects their ability to perform constitutional duties.

 

Relevant Constitutional and Statutory Links

 

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5: Establishes the Speaker’s role as an officer chosen by the House.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 2

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: Grants the House authority to determine its rules, which define the Speaker’s powers.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 5

2 U.S.C. § 1961: Establishes the Capitol Police Board, which includes the Speaker’s appointee, the House Sergeant at Arms, and outlines its security oversight role.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1961

2 U.S.C. § 1974: Details the Capitol Police Board’s authority to make security decisions, under which the Speaker operates.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1974

House Rule I, Clause 3: Outlines the Speaker’s duty to preserve order and decorum, which includes security responsibilities.
House Rules - 119th Congress

 

Critical Considerations

 

Shared Responsibility: While the Speaker has significant influence over House security, decisions about Capitol-wide security involve coordination with the Senate and the Capitol Police Board. Claims on X suggesting the Speaker has unilateral control (e.g., over National Guard deployment) may oversimplify the process, as such decisions often require broader consultation.

Historical Context: The Speaker’s security role became a focal point during events like the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, where questions arose about the Speaker’s authority to request additional security. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund’s statements, as cited in X posts, suggest the Speaker’s role is explicitly written in law, though specific decisions may involve multiple stakeholders.

Non-Member Eligibility: Interestingly, the Constitution does not require the Speaker to be a House member, though all Speakers have been members to date. This does not directly affect security responsibilities but highlights the flexibility of the Speaker’s role.

 

Conclusion

 

The Speaker of the House controls House operations due to their constitutional designation as the presiding officer (Article I, Section 2), their authority under House rules to manage proceedings, and their role as the majority party leader. Their security responsibilities arise from appointing and overseeing the House Sergeant at Arms, serving on the Capitol Police Board, and ensuring order in the House, as codified in statutes like 2 U.S.C. § 1961 and House Rule I. While the Speaker’s influence over Capitol security is significant, it is not absolute, as it involves coordination with other congressional leaders and entities. The provided constitutional and statutory links ground these responsibilities in law, ensuring clarity on the Speaker’s critical role in Congress and its security.

5 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

So in 2020 Trump blamed Nancy Pelosi for not calling in the National Guard to end the Capitol riots, and said he didn’t have the authority to do that. And what do you know, it turns out Trump does have the authority to deploy the National Guard after all. Lying sack of sh!t. And not a peep from MAGA, who defended Trump when he said he didn’t have the authority to do this in 2020. Double standard hypocrites, every last one of them.

You seem to skip the point that Pelosi refused Trump's off to deploy troops.  You a good little Leftist doing this.  She refuses but it is Trump's fault.  She knew what she was doing setting a trap for Trump so she could hold the phony Commission she set up.

Just now, thaipo7 said:

You seem to skip the point that Pelosi refused Trump's off to deploy troops.  You a good little Leftist doing this.  She refuses but it is Trump's fault.  She knew what she was doing setting a trap for Trump so she could hold the phony Commission she set up.

Next coup?  When was the first one?  Started with Obama and his spying on Trump and Hillary paying $7 million for a phone dossier.  You have the Democrat narrative down pretty pat.

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

Talk to me like an idiot and I'll prove you are an idiot - here you go. 

 

The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is a pivotal figure in Congress, with significant control over House operations and specific responsibilities related to security, particularly for the Capitol and its grounds. Below is a clear explanation of why the Speaker holds this authority and the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, grounded in the provided sources and general knowledge of U.S. government structure.Why the Speaker Controls CongressThe Speaker of the House is the presiding officer of the House of Representatives, a role established by the U.S. Constitution and further defined by House rules and federal statutes. The Speaker’s control over Congress, specifically the House, stems from their constitutional, institutional, and partisan roles:Constitutional Basis:

The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, states: “The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” This clause establishes the Speaker as the elected leader of the House, chosen by its members, typically from the majority party, to oversee its operations.

While the Constitution does not explicitly detail the Speaker’s powers, it grants the House authority to determine its own rules and proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings…”). Through these rules, the Speaker is vested with significant authority to manage House business.

Institutional Role:

The Speaker is the administrative head of the House, responsible for maintaining order, managing proceedings, and governing its business. This includes controlling the order of business on the House floor, appointing members to committees, and referring legislation to appropriate committees.

The Speaker acts as a negotiator between the House, the President, and the Senate, playing a key role in advancing the House’s legislative agenda, including its “power of the purse” (originating revenue bills and appropriating funds, per Article I, Section 7).

Partisan Role:

As the de facto leader of the majority party in the House, the Speaker shapes the legislative priorities and ensures party discipline. This role enhances their influence over House activities, as they align the chamber’s agenda with the majority party’s goals.

Presiding Officer:

The Speaker presides over House sessions, though they often delegate this duty to other members. They maintain order, recognize members to speak, and rule on procedural matters, ensuring the House functions smoothly.

 

Take particular note: 

 

Security Responsibilities of the SpeakerThe Speaker’s role in Capitol security is derived from House rules, federal statutes, and their oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms, who is directly responsible for maintaining security within the House chamber and Capitol complex. Here’s a detailed breakdown:Oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms:

 

The Speaker appoints and oversees the House Sergeant at Arms, one of the “other Officers” referenced in Article I, Section 2, Clause 5. The Sergeant at Arms is responsible for maintaining order and security in the House chamber, galleries, and Capitol buildings, as well as protecting members, staff, and visitors.

The Sergeant at Arms works under the Speaker’s direction to execute security protocols, including coordinating with the U.S. Capitol Police. Posts on X and some sources indicate that the Speaker’s authority extends to approving or denying additional security measures, such as National Guard deployment, though this is typically done in consultation with other congressional leaders.

 

Capitol Police Board:

 

The Speaker is a member of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the U.S. Capitol Police. The board, established under 2 U.S.C. § 1961, includes the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the Architect of the Capitol. The Speaker’s role on this board gives them significant influence over Capitol security policies and operations.

 

The Capitol Police are tasked with protecting the Capitol complex, including the House and Senate chambers, under the board’s direction. The Speaker’s authority here is not absolute, as decisions are made collectively, but their position as House leader amplifies their influence.

 

Statutory Authority:

 

The Speaker’s security responsibilities are codified in federal law, particularly through the rules governing the Capitol Police and the Sergeant at Arms. For example, 2 U.S.C. § 1974 authorizes the Capitol Police Board, chaired by a member chosen by the Speaker and Senate leadership, to make security-related decisions. Additionally, House Rule I, Clause 3, assigns the Speaker the duty to “preserve order and decorum” in the House, which extends to security oversight.

 

The Speaker is second in the line of presidential succession after the Vice President, as established by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. § 19). This underscores their critical role in national governance and justifies their involvement in security matters, as the Capitol’s safety directly affects their ability to perform constitutional duties.

 

Relevant Constitutional and Statutory Links

 

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5: Establishes the Speaker’s role as an officer chosen by the House.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 2

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: Grants the House authority to determine its rules, which define the Speaker’s powers.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 5

2 U.S.C. § 1961: Establishes the Capitol Police Board, which includes the Speaker’s appointee, the House Sergeant at Arms, and outlines its security oversight role.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1961

2 U.S.C. § 1974: Details the Capitol Police Board’s authority to make security decisions, under which the Speaker operates.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1974

House Rule I, Clause 3: Outlines the Speaker’s duty to preserve order and decorum, which includes security responsibilities.
House Rules - 119th Congress

 

Critical Considerations

 

Shared Responsibility: While the Speaker has significant influence over House security, decisions about Capitol-wide security involve coordination with the Senate and the Capitol Police Board. Claims on X suggesting the Speaker has unilateral control (e.g., over National Guard deployment) may oversimplify the process, as such decisions often require broader consultation.

Historical Context: The Speaker’s security role became a focal point during events like the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, where questions arose about the Speaker’s authority to request additional security. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund’s statements, as cited in X posts, suggest the Speaker’s role is explicitly written in law, though specific decisions may involve multiple stakeholders.

Non-Member Eligibility: Interestingly, the Constitution does not require the Speaker to be a House member, though all Speakers have been members to date. This does not directly affect security responsibilities but highlights the flexibility of the Speaker’s role.

 

Conclusion

 

The Speaker of the House controls House operations due to their constitutional designation as the presiding officer (Article I, Section 2), their authority under House rules to manage proceedings, and their role as the majority party leader. Their security responsibilities arise from appointing and overseeing the House Sergeant at Arms, serving on the Capitol Police Board, and ensuring order in the House, as codified in statutes like 2 U.S.C. § 1961 and House Rule I. While the Speaker’s influence over Capitol security is significant, it is not absolute, as it involves coordination with other congressional leaders and entities. The provided constitutional and statutory links ground these responsibilities in law, ensuring clarity on the Speaker’s critical role in Congress and its security.

Why do you always mention "the speaker" and not "the speakers". That's willingly dishonest. The speakers of the House and of the Senate have exactly the same authority.....🙂

2 hours ago, theblether said:

 

Talk to me like an idiot and I'll prove you are an idiot - here you go. 

 

The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is a pivotal figure in Congress, with significant control over House operations and specific responsibilities related to security, particularly for the Capitol and its grounds. Below is a clear explanation of why the Speaker holds this authority and the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, grounded in the provided sources and general knowledge of U.S. government structure.Why the Speaker Controls CongressThe Speaker of the House is the presiding officer of the House of Representatives, a role established by the U.S. Constitution and further defined by House rules and federal statutes. The Speaker’s control over Congress, specifically the House, stems from their constitutional, institutional, and partisan roles:Constitutional Basis:

The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, states: “The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” This clause establishes the Speaker as the elected leader of the House, chosen by its members, typically from the majority party, to oversee its operations.

While the Constitution does not explicitly detail the Speaker’s powers, it grants the House authority to determine its own rules and proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings…”). Through these rules, the Speaker is vested with significant authority to manage House business.

Institutional Role:

The Speaker is the administrative head of the House, responsible for maintaining order, managing proceedings, and governing its business. This includes controlling the order of business on the House floor, appointing members to committees, and referring legislation to appropriate committees.

The Speaker acts as a negotiator between the House, the President, and the Senate, playing a key role in advancing the House’s legislative agenda, including its “power of the purse” (originating revenue bills and appropriating funds, per Article I, Section 7).

Partisan Role:

As the de facto leader of the majority party in the House, the Speaker shapes the legislative priorities and ensures party discipline. This role enhances their influence over House activities, as they align the chamber’s agenda with the majority party’s goals.

Presiding Officer:

The Speaker presides over House sessions, though they often delegate this duty to other members. They maintain order, recognize members to speak, and rule on procedural matters, ensuring the House functions smoothly.

 

Take particular note: 

 

Security Responsibilities of the SpeakerThe Speaker’s role in Capitol security is derived from House rules, federal statutes, and their oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms, who is directly responsible for maintaining security within the House chamber and Capitol complex. Here’s a detailed breakdown:Oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms:

 

The Speaker appoints and oversees the House Sergeant at Arms, one of the “other Officers” referenced in Article I, Section 2, Clause 5. The Sergeant at Arms is responsible for maintaining order and security in the House chamber, galleries, and Capitol buildings, as well as protecting members, staff, and visitors.

The Sergeant at Arms works under the Speaker’s direction to execute security protocols, including coordinating with the U.S. Capitol Police. Posts on X and some sources indicate that the Speaker’s authority extends to approving or denying additional security measures, such as National Guard deployment, though this is typically done in consultation with other congressional leaders.

 

Capitol Police Board:

 

The Speaker is a member of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the U.S. Capitol Police. The board, established under 2 U.S.C. § 1961, includes the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the Architect of the Capitol. The Speaker’s role on this board gives them significant influence over Capitol security policies and operations.

 

The Capitol Police are tasked with protecting the Capitol complex, including the House and Senate chambers, under the board’s direction. The Speaker’s authority here is not absolute, as decisions are made collectively, but their position as House leader amplifies their influence.

 

Statutory Authority:

 

The Speaker’s security responsibilities are codified in federal law, particularly through the rules governing the Capitol Police and the Sergeant at Arms. For example, 2 U.S.C. § 1974 authorizes the Capitol Police Board, chaired by a member chosen by the Speaker and Senate leadership, to make security-related decisions. Additionally, House Rule I, Clause 3, assigns the Speaker the duty to “preserve order and decorum” in the House, which extends to security oversight.

 

The Speaker is second in the line of presidential succession after the Vice President, as established by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. § 19). This underscores their critical role in national governance and justifies their involvement in security matters, as the Capitol’s safety directly affects their ability to perform constitutional duties.

 

Relevant Constitutional and Statutory Links

 

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5: Establishes the Speaker’s role as an officer chosen by the House.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 2

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: Grants the House authority to determine its rules, which define the Speaker’s powers.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 5

2 U.S.C. § 1961: Establishes the Capitol Police Board, which includes the Speaker’s appointee, the House Sergeant at Arms, and outlines its security oversight role.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1961

2 U.S.C. § 1974: Details the Capitol Police Board’s authority to make security decisions, under which the Speaker operates.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1974

House Rule I, Clause 3: Outlines the Speaker’s duty to preserve order and decorum, which includes security responsibilities.
House Rules - 119th Congress

 

Critical Considerations

 

Shared Responsibility: While the Speaker has significant influence over House security, decisions about Capitol-wide security involve coordination with the Senate and the Capitol Police Board. Claims on X suggesting the Speaker has unilateral control (e.g., over National Guard deployment) may oversimplify the process, as such decisions often require broader consultation.

Historical Context: The Speaker’s security role became a focal point during events like the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, where questions arose about the Speaker’s authority to request additional security. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund’s statements, as cited in X posts, suggest the Speaker’s role is explicitly written in law, though specific decisions may involve multiple stakeholders.

Non-Member Eligibility: Interestingly, the Constitution does not require the Speaker to be a House member, though all Speakers have been members to date. This does not directly affect security responsibilities but highlights the flexibility of the Speaker’s role.

 

Conclusion

 

The Speaker of the House controls House operations due to their constitutional designation as the presiding officer (Article I, Section 2), their authority under House rules to manage proceedings, and their role as the majority party leader. Their security responsibilities arise from appointing and overseeing the House Sergeant at Arms, serving on the Capitol Police Board, and ensuring order in the House, as codified in statutes like 2 U.S.C. § 1961 and House Rule I. While the Speaker’s influence over Capitol security is significant, it is not absolute, as it involves coordination with other congressional leaders and entities. The provided constitutional and statutory links ground these responsibilities in law, ensuring clarity on the Speaker’s critical role in Congress and its security.

You are lying! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

The speaker is not part of the Capitol police board! It's a fake!

 

Quote from the USCP website

"The Capitol Police Board consists of the Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the U.S. Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol. The Chief of the United States Capitol Police serves in an ex-officio non-voting capacity. The Chairmanship alternates annually between the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms."

https://www.uscp.gov/the-department/oversight

 

1 hour ago, thaipo7 said:

You seem to skip the point that Pelosi refused Trump's off to deploy troops.  You a good little Leftist doing this.  She refuses but it is Trump's fault.  She knew what she was doing setting a trap for Trump so she could hold the phony Commission she set up.

Complete MAGA fake news B.S. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

It's the Mayor who refused the offer. Actually it wasn't really an offer and it was to protect the protesters, not the Capitol! 

https://fr.scribd.com/document/617878128/Anthony-Ornato-Transcript-Nov-29

 

 

13 hours ago, poyai111 said:

Blissful ignorance. The Capitol area itself is under the jurisdiction of the Speaker who on January 6th was Nancy Pelosi. The area outside of the Capitol does indeed come under the purview of the President hence in both cases Trump was observing constitutional requirements.

Thank you... the Dems who used this action to say Trump lied are really ignorant. Nancy Pelosi did not want to use National Guard. She opposed Trumps wishes. Whereas this time around, Pelosi wasn't around to say NO. I neither agree nor disagree with the deployment of National Guard. They are not going around arresting people, but instead are aiding the police with logistics. I do not know how serious the crime is in DC. I think the police are outmatched compared to the criminal activity though. I recall my last time i was passing through DC. It was horrible, not what the capital of the US should be like. Rampant drugs and thugs almost everywhere you could see. I was driving tractor trailers back then and DC as well as New York was considered a no stop zone. Companies told their drivers that if you are passing through or making delivery there. You do not stop for anything until either leaving the state or reaching your destination. In New York we were told to not even stop for red lights unless we had to due to traffic in the middle of the night. 

I am sure there will be a lot of people here who call BS to what I am saying. But i went there many times and know this for sure. 

9 hours ago, theblether said:

 

Talk to me like an idiot and I'll prove you are an idiot - here you go. 

 

The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is a pivotal figure in Congress, with significant control over House operations and specific responsibilities related to security, particularly for the Capitol and its grounds. Below is a clear explanation of why the Speaker holds this authority and the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, grounded in the provided sources and general knowledge of U.S. government structure.Why the Speaker Controls CongressThe Speaker of the House is the presiding officer of the House of Representatives, a role established by the U.S. Constitution and further defined by House rules and federal statutes. The Speaker’s control over Congress, specifically the House, stems from their constitutional, institutional, and partisan roles:Constitutional Basis:

The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, states: “The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” This clause establishes the Speaker as the elected leader of the House, chosen by its members, typically from the majority party, to oversee its operations.

While the Constitution does not explicitly detail the Speaker’s powers, it grants the House authority to determine its own rules and proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings…”). Through these rules, the Speaker is vested with significant authority to manage House business.

Institutional Role:

The Speaker is the administrative head of the House, responsible for maintaining order, managing proceedings, and governing its business. This includes controlling the order of business on the House floor, appointing members to committees, and referring legislation to appropriate committees.

The Speaker acts as a negotiator between the House, the President, and the Senate, playing a key role in advancing the House’s legislative agenda, including its “power of the purse” (originating revenue bills and appropriating funds, per Article I, Section 7).

Partisan Role:

As the de facto leader of the majority party in the House, the Speaker shapes the legislative priorities and ensures party discipline. This role enhances their influence over House activities, as they align the chamber’s agenda with the majority party’s goals.

Presiding Officer:

The Speaker presides over House sessions, though they often delegate this duty to other members. They maintain order, recognize members to speak, and rule on procedural matters, ensuring the House functions smoothly.

 

Take particular note: 

 

Security Responsibilities of the SpeakerThe Speaker’s role in Capitol security is derived from House rules, federal statutes, and their oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms, who is directly responsible for maintaining security within the House chamber and Capitol complex. Here’s a detailed breakdown:Oversight of the House Sergeant at Arms:

 

The Speaker appoints and oversees the House Sergeant at Arms, one of the “other Officers” referenced in Article I, Section 2, Clause 5. The Sergeant at Arms is responsible for maintaining order and security in the House chamber, galleries, and Capitol buildings, as well as protecting members, staff, and visitors.

The Sergeant at Arms works under the Speaker’s direction to execute security protocols, including coordinating with the U.S. Capitol Police. Posts on X and some sources indicate that the Speaker’s authority extends to approving or denying additional security measures, such as National Guard deployment, though this is typically done in consultation with other congressional leaders.

 

Capitol Police Board:

 

The Speaker is a member of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the U.S. Capitol Police. The board, established under 2 U.S.C. § 1961, includes the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the Architect of the Capitol. The Speaker’s role on this board gives them significant influence over Capitol security policies and operations.

 

The Capitol Police are tasked with protecting the Capitol complex, including the House and Senate chambers, under the board’s direction. The Speaker’s authority here is not absolute, as decisions are made collectively, but their position as House leader amplifies their influence.

 

Statutory Authority:

 

The Speaker’s security responsibilities are codified in federal law, particularly through the rules governing the Capitol Police and the Sergeant at Arms. For example, 2 U.S.C. § 1974 authorizes the Capitol Police Board, chaired by a member chosen by the Speaker and Senate leadership, to make security-related decisions. Additionally, House Rule I, Clause 3, assigns the Speaker the duty to “preserve order and decorum” in the House, which extends to security oversight.

 

The Speaker is second in the line of presidential succession after the Vice President, as established by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. § 19). This underscores their critical role in national governance and justifies their involvement in security matters, as the Capitol’s safety directly affects their ability to perform constitutional duties.

 

Relevant Constitutional and Statutory Links

 

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5: Establishes the Speaker’s role as an officer chosen by the House.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 2

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: Grants the House authority to determine its rules, which define the Speaker’s powers.
Constitution Annotated - Article I, Section 5

2 U.S.C. § 1961: Establishes the Capitol Police Board, which includes the Speaker’s appointee, the House Sergeant at Arms, and outlines its security oversight role.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1961

2 U.S.C. § 1974: Details the Capitol Police Board’s authority to make security decisions, under which the Speaker operates.
U.S. Code - 2 U.S.C. § 1974

House Rule I, Clause 3: Outlines the Speaker’s duty to preserve order and decorum, which includes security responsibilities.
House Rules - 119th Congress

 

Critical Considerations

 

Shared Responsibility: While the Speaker has significant influence over House security, decisions about Capitol-wide security involve coordination with the Senate and the Capitol Police Board. Claims on X suggesting the Speaker has unilateral control (e.g., over National Guard deployment) may oversimplify the process, as such decisions often require broader consultation.

Historical Context: The Speaker’s security role became a focal point during events like the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, where questions arose about the Speaker’s authority to request additional security. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund’s statements, as cited in X posts, suggest the Speaker’s role is explicitly written in law, though specific decisions may involve multiple stakeholders.

Non-Member Eligibility: Interestingly, the Constitution does not require the Speaker to be a House member, though all Speakers have been members to date. This does not directly affect security responsibilities but highlights the flexibility of the Speaker’s role.

 

Conclusion

 

The Speaker of the House controls House operations due to their constitutional designation as the presiding officer (Article I, Section 2), their authority under House rules to manage proceedings, and their role as the majority party leader. Their security responsibilities arise from appointing and overseeing the House Sergeant at Arms, serving on the Capitol Police Board, and ensuring order in the House, as codified in statutes like 2 U.S.C. § 1961 and House Rule I. While the Speaker’s influence over Capitol security is significant, it is not absolute, as it involves coordination with other congressional leaders and entities. The provided constitutional and statutory links ground these responsibilities in law, ensuring clarity on the Speaker’s critical role in Congress and its security.

Yaunn……..the fact of the matter this is political theater used to further divide us and titillate the fascist types amongst us.71% of the residents of Washington are dead set against this over reach it’s a dog and pony show also quite possibly a dress rehearsal.

7 hours ago, candide said:

Complete MAGA fake news B.S. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

It's the Mayor who refused the offer. Actually it wasn't really an offer and it was to protect the protesters, not the Capitol! 

https://fr.scribd.com/document/617878128/Anthony-Ornato-Transcript-Nov-29

 

 

 

15 minutes ago, thesetat said:

Thank you... the Dems who used this action to say Trump lied are really ignorant. Nancy Pelosi did not want to use National Guard. She opposed Trumps wishes. Whereas this time around, Pelosi wasn't around to say NO. I neither agree nor disagree with the deployment of National Guard. They are not going around arresting people, but instead are aiding the police with logistics. I do not know how serious the crime is in DC. I think the police are outmatched compared to the criminal activity though. I recall my last time i was passing through DC. It was horrible, not what the capital of the US should be like. Rampant drugs and thugs almost everywhere you could see. I was driving tractor trailers back then and DC as well as New York was considered a no stop zone. Companies told their drivers that if you are passing through or making delivery there. You do not stop for anything until either leaving the state or reaching your destination. In New York we were told to not even stop for red lights unless we had to due to traffic in the middle of the night. 

I am sure there will be a lot of people here who call BS to what I am saying. But i went there many times and know this for sure. 

Posting the same lie over and over will  not make it true.

 

It's the Mayor who rejected the "offer", not Pelosi! 

(And the "offer" was to protect the protesters  not the Capitol)

 

https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairman-loudermilk-publishes-never-before-released-anthony-ornato-transcribed-interview

 

Crime in DC has dropped 30% in the past two years. Trump simply doesn't want to see any unpleasant sights on this way to the golf course and loves to flex his authoritarian muscles. He is anti democracy. He is a dictator in waiting. He is a scourge on the land. 

Just fyi.

 

2 hours ago, shdmn said:

Just fyi.

 

That was certainly a foolish act and it will likely affect this lawyer's career dramatically. But I can certainly understand his frustration, nobody wants to see their city occupied these goons, who have no business being there. Trump is an over bearing weasal, who is abusing his power, and nobody seems to be able to stop the abuses. 

 

Attack with a deli weapon. Wow. Mustard could have gotten in the guy's eyes! 

15 hours ago, theblether said:

 

Sometimes you wonder if Democrats have the brains to follow clear precedent. The Speaker is the third most powerful person in the US political system and they alone control the curtilage of Congress. 

 

Presidents can only attend Congress at the invitation of the Speaker. 

 

The Speaker controls the House of Representatives - not the President - and no 

You are right donkey The grass is blue.  
 

And don’t forget your favorite lie by your Furor   that these January 6 treason criminals were all 1500 peaceful tourists that deserve a pardon.   

4 hours ago, Wake Up1 said:

You are right donkey The grass is blue.  
 

And don’t forget your favorite lie by your Furor   that these January 6 treason criminals were all 1500 peaceful tourists that deserve a pardon.   

 

Jan 6 was a disgrace as is your comment little man 

17 hours ago, candide said:

You are lying! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

The speaker is not part of the Capitol police board! It's a fake!

 

Quote from the USCP website

"The Capitol Police Board consists of the Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the U.S. Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol. The Chief of the United States Capitol Police serves in an ex-officio non-voting capacity. The Chairmanship alternates annually between the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms."

https://www.uscp.gov/the-department/oversight

 

 

48 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

Jan 6 was a disgrace as is your comment little man 

Is posting a lie about the Capitol Police Board composition also a disgrace? 🙂

1 hour ago, candide said:

 

Is posting a lie about the Capitol Police Board composition also a disgrace? 🙂

 

Aye, you're determined. The Speaker controls the Capital Police Board via the Sergeant at Arms. So yes, while they don't sit on the board they control and direct what happens. 

 

Do a victory lap.  

 

At the end of the day my basic point stands. What happens within the Congresdional cartilage is the responsibility of the Speaker - not the President. 

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

Aye, you're determined. The Speaker controls the Capital Police Board via the Sergeant at Arms. So yes, while they don't sit on the board they control and direct what happens. 

 

Do a victory lap.  

 

At the end of the day my basic point stands. What happens within the Congresdional cartilage is the responsibility of the Speaker - not the President. 

At the end of the day, you have.... nothing  apart from a dishonest and distorting presentation!.

 

1. You continuously ignore (and hide) the fact the the Senate leader (who was a Republican) has exactly the same responsibilities as the House speaker. There is no predominance of the House speaker on the Senate leader.

2. You wilingly misrepresent the fact that the responsibility of "order" in the House, is not the responsibility of order in the whole Capitol. It's the same for the Senate leader. None of them is responsible for "order" in the whole Capitol.

2. You also ignore the fact that the 'offer' (so to say) was made to, and rejected by, the Mayor, not by Pelosi. Per Ornato's testimony touted by Loudermilk.

https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairman-loudermilk-publishes-never-before-released-anthony-ornato-transcribed-interview

3. Your interpretation is biased and inaccurate. This also confirmed by facts. The NG ultimately was sent to restore order (too late)   and it was not on Pelosi's order.

4. The insurrection act doesn't mention any restriction such as the one you evoked.