video screenshot

 

The feud between Hunter Biden and Melania Trump reached boiling point on Thursday, as Biden refused to apologise for his claim about Melania’s alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein. The former US president’s son was defiant in an expletive-charged YouTube appearance, challenging Melania’s legal threat over his controversial comments.

 

Last month, Biden claimed Epstein introduced Melania to her husband, US President Donald Trump. Melania’s lawyer, Alejandro Brito, slammed the statement as “extremely salacious” and demanded a retraction, threatening a billion-baht lawsuit for the damage caused to her reputation.

 

On YouTube, Biden doubled down, refusing to apologise and referencing Trump biographer Michael Wolff to support his assertion. President Trump has previously dismissed Wolff as unreliable, questioning his claims about the Trump family.

 

Following pressure from Melania’s legal team, The Daily Beast removed their report on Wolff’s allegation, issuing an apology for any confusion caused. Biden, however, stood by his remark, inviting the Trumps to clarify their side in a deposition, reported ABC News.

 

In response, Melania’s spokesperson stated that her lawyers are addressing the spreading of defamatory falsehoods. Melania insists the true story of her meeting with Trump, as detailed in her memoir, involves a modelling agent's introduction at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998.

 

Biden’s legal troubles aren’t new. He was pardoned by his father before Trump’s inauguration, avoiding sentences for convictions in Delaware and California. Moreover, he is embroiled in multiple lawsuits, including a defamation case against the former CEO of Overstock.com set for trial soon.

 

This unfolding saga adds a new dimension to the Biden-Trump dynamic, drawing public attention and legal scrutiny. The legal and personal ramifications of this skirmish could have lasting impacts on both parties involved.

 

The confrontation between Biden and Melania highlights the relentless tension and litigation frequently surrounding high-profile figures. As the legal processes continue, the extent of this conflict's effects remains to be seen.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from ABC News 2025-08-16

 

One of Epsteins escorts???yeiks!!!

Yep. She was more qualified for an "Epstein Visa" than an "Einstein Visa".

 

 

I hope she destroys the gun toting, crack snorting, hooker banging, silver spoon delinquent.

 

Lets hope Joe is around to see it.

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I hope she destroys the gun toting, crack snorting, hooker banging, silver spoon delinquent.

 

Lets hope Joe is around to see it.

Hope is eternal for you...

Donald told her to do it and he will let her use his lawyers. Go down that hole...

I think all this is very funny. Great entertainment value all around. Even better if this affair would involve tax money in any way, at least there would be a return on investment.

8 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I hope she destroys the gun toting, crack snorting, hooker banging, silver spoon delinquent.

 

Lets hope Joe is around to see it.

spoken like someone needing a chill pill badly

No kidding this whole Presidency is at least tightropng the fringe of its hilarity.

 

Entertainment with a dash chaos 

 

11 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

spoken like someone needing a chill pill badly

 

Nah.

 

Great entertainment. 😀

 

I got the popcorn ready.  Hopefully Netflix do a documentary on it like when Depp exposed the lies of Heard. 

28 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I hope she destroys the gun toting, crack snorting, hooker banging, silver spoon delinquent.

 

Lets hope Joe is around to see it.

Are you describing yourself?

5 minutes ago, Tug said:

Are you describing yourself?

 

You are...

 

No you are...

 

No you are...

 

Grow up Tug. Your posts are getting increasingly pathetic.

13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Nah.

 

Great entertainment. 😀

 

I got the popcorn ready.  Hopefully Netflix do a documentary on it like when Depp exposed the lies of Heard. 

So you have something more for your enjoyment I have copied from yestersday post by Wingate.

 

Bad move by that woman. She brought attention back on to Epstein, and for what?

 

Whatever his flaws, Hunter is clever enough to note the introduction story by attributing it to someone else (author Michael Wolfe). Repeating what someone else said, and stating specifically where you gleaned it, leaves Hunter in the clear. It's like Trump saying he "heard" Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Hunter just pulled a Donny.

 

Still, if the case comes to court, it will have Epstein in the news every single day of the trial. The deposition of Ms Trump, under oath, would be quite amusing.

 

This is Hunter 1, Trumps 0. That's like losing to the 1962 NY Mets.

Just more Trump bs.

 

Of course, the MAGA crowd will have forgotten that DT sued the WSJ for $10b over its reporting of Epstein matters.

 

Of course it went nowhere. Yet again, it was just noise and gibberish from a silly old man with dementia.

Mrs Trump really ought to be careful going to court.

 

One hears that those ICE chappies are rather keen on hanging around outside the courts, and we know what absolute stickers they are for visa and immigration status being above board!

 

Anyway, I thought that their eyes first met at a bible study session at the Pink Pussycat Club or something like that...

6 hours ago, webfact said:

video screenshot

 

The feud between Hunter Biden and Melania Trump reached boiling point on Thursday, as Biden refused to apologise for his claim about Melania’s alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein. The US president’s son was defiant in an expletive-charged YouTube appearance, challenging Melania’s legal threat over his controversial comments.

 

Last month, Biden claimed Epstein introduced Melania to her husband, former US President Donald Trump. Melania’s lawyer, Alejandro Brito, slammed the statement as “extremely salacious” and demanded a retraction, threatening a billion-baht lawsuit for the damage caused to her reputation.

 

On YouTube, Biden doubled down, refusing to apologise and referencing Trump biographer Michael Wolff to support his assertion. President Trump has previously dismissed Wolff as unreliable, questioning his claims about the Trump family.

 

Following pressure from Melania’s legal team, The Daily Beast removed their report on Wolff’s allegation, issuing an apology for any confusion caused. Biden, however, stood by his remark, inviting the Trumps to clarify their side in a deposition, reported ABC News.

 

In response, Melania’s spokesperson stated that her lawyers are addressing the spreading of defamatory falsehoods. Melania insists the true story of her meeting with Trump, as detailed in her memoir, involves a modelling agent's introduction at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998.

 

Biden’s legal troubles aren’t new. He was pardoned by his father before Trump’s inauguration, avoiding sentences for convictions in Delaware and California. Moreover, he is embroiled in multiple lawsuits, including a defamation case against the former CEO of Overstock.com set for trial soon.

 

This unfolding saga adds a new dimension to the Biden-Trump dynamic, drawing public attention and legal scrutiny. The legal and personal ramifications of this skirmish could have lasting impacts on both parties involved.

 

The confrontation between Biden and Melania highlights the relentless tension and litigation frequently surrounding high-profile figures. As the legal processes continue, the extent of this conflict's effects remains to be seen.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from ABC News 2025-08-16

 

I suppose Biden got some evidence.

And for me it's not surprising that Melania was offered to Donnie.

She was poor, no visa and he was rich and stupid.

Good match.

12 minutes ago, JAG said:

Anyway, I thought that their eyes first met at a bible study session at the Pink Pussycat Club or something like that...

 

 

Yes, in the VIP Room, actually.

Epstein?  You mean the topic that POTUS has demanded that we forget?

Ok, I won't mention his name in the future, but would "pedo buddy" work?

 

One doesn't need to be an Einstein to know how she got her visa... 

 

6 minutes ago, BKKKevin said:

Definitely Einstein Visa worthy... 

 

And today's text is from Paul's letter to the Colossians...

 

 

6 minutes ago, JAG said:

And today's text is from Paul's letter to the Colossians...

The same expression as his mug shot.

The angry look doesn't suit her, although I must confess that she can still be attractive, scrubs up well if you like; both Gavin Newsom and Justin Trudeau seem to think so, if recent photographs are to be believed!

 

The bloke looks like a fairly standard East Coast plonker! 

3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

The same expression as his mug shot.

Maybe he has just realised that he can't "rise to the occasion"?

Melania should have ignored any comment from a low-life such as Hunter Biden. However, her lawyers, sensing mega bucks business, apparently advised otherwise.

 

2 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Melania should have ignored any comment from a low-life such as Hunter Biden. However, her lawyers, sensing mega bucks business, apparently advised otherwise.

 

Wrong  Her husband told her to do it and his laywers would represent her

Keep up 

2 hours ago, sharot724 said:

Donald told her to do it and he will let her use his lawyers. Go down that hole...

Sounds like many have already done that 🙂

 

 

 

Are immigrants allowed to sue American citizens?

7 minutes ago, Jerzy Swirski said:

Sounds like many have already done that 🙂

The same old playbook from Trump. Lawsuits are his way of dealing with problems. That is his go to.

 

"extremely salacious", hmmm I am not sure. Let us take a look at those publicly posted nude modeling photos again to better judge the legs she stands on with this idea ...

8 hours ago, webfact said:

On YouTube, Biden doubled down, refusing to apologise and referencing Trump biographer Michael Wolff to support his assertion.

 

 

Well if he is hanging his hat on Wolff then he's in trouble......repeating something somebody else said is no defence......he has to prove that what he said/published is true......or that it was no more than a passing comment/opinion.