13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Were there mass lobotomies

How did you react to getting a lobotomy?

8 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Any ideas on why America went for his bull<deleted>. I can not grasp how this became acceptable,

Says the guy who supports Karen Bass.

It's difficult to imagine anyone could be a worse president than Trump, maybe Tucker Carlson?

5 hours ago, TedG said:

How did you react to getting a lobotomy?

I had two, in the hope I could get within a few points of your IQ.

On 6/8/2026 at 12:13 PM, MikeandDow said:

She would have been better than this clearly insane man you have now even a blind man can see he is insane !

Exactly! Especially given her strong track record of success at....... (feel free to insert any signature Harris accomplishment here)

I think over time the American electorate will come to see Hillary Clinton's loss in the 2016 election as one of their most regrettable electoral missteps in all of American history.

Edited June 12Jun 12 by Gecko123

15 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Exactly! Especially given her strong track record of success at....... (feel free to insert any signature Harris accomplishment here)

success at ... good in bed, being a woman, multi racial: Indian for the CA voter, and Black for the Southern USA voter, in the national election.

And still failed miserably 🙄

Those were her pluses. Luckily she only dropped the ball a couple times. OK, more than a couple times, from G AI ...

Let's not forget ... total hypocrisy

Edited June 12Jun 12 by KhunLA

10 minutes ago, Gecko123 said:

I think over time the American electorate will come to see Hillary Clinton's loss in the 2016 election as one of their most regrettable electoral missteps in all of American history.

100%. They've could have gotten a smart, strong, experienced president. Instead they chose the complete opposite.

This is typical yanks crying over split milk!! stop putting your head in the sand grow some balls and do something !! why is he not being thrown out !!

MAGA.. Make Americans Normal Again.

6 hours ago, Real Name Hidden said:

It's difficult to imagine anyone could be a worse president than Trump, maybe Tucker Carlson?

Not sure. He's a rat all right, but worse than Trump? That's gonna take a serious effort. Maybe someone like Stephen Miller. He might be worse.

51 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

100%. They've could have gotten a smart, strong, experienced president. Instead they chose the complete opposite.

Never fear, my friend. Only two years and a bit until you can relax under the JD Rubio administration.

6 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Any ideas on why America went for his bull<deleted>. I can not grasp how this became acceptable,

Lack of education and racism. They also liked Trumps illiteracy, just one of them.

3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Lack of education and racism. They also liked Trumps illiteracy, just one of them.

I agree there is a lack of racism in the US. Education? Perhaps.

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

I agree there is a lack of racism in the US. Education? Perhaps.

And a lack of literacy among MAGA morons.

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Never fear, my friend. Only two years and a bit until you can relax under the JD Rubio administration.

I have my doubts that either of them will run in 2028. Too much baggage accumulated during this utter disaster of a presidency, and it will be fresh in people's minds.

No way Trump is able or willing to try to turn it around. If he cannot cancel/corrupt the midterms he'll just try to hold on to the money he's scammed so far and ride into the sunset not giving a s**t. Doubt he'll last that long, though. He's obviously on a serious downward trajectory.

Vance and Rubio might run in 2032, but I seriously doubt they'll run together.

6 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

And a lack of literacy among MAGA morons.

Your evidence being.....

I would take you more seriously if YOUR literacy and grammatical competence were a little better, to be honest. I can't make out what you meant by

8 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

They also liked Trumps illiteracy, just one of them.

13 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

I have my doubts that either of them will run in 2028. Too much baggage accumulated during this utter disaster of a presidency, and it will be fresh in people's minds.

No way Trump is able or willing to try to turn it around. If he cannot cancel/corrupt the midterms he'll just try to hold on to the money he's scammed so far and ride into the sunset not giving a s**t. Doubt he'll last that long, though. He's obviously on a serious downward trajectory.

Vance and Rubio might run in 2032, but I seriously doubt they'll run together.

You may be right. Two years is an eternity in politics.

Between the two, Rubio is getting the better reviews so far. As SofS, he can distance himself from any discussion of economic woes more easily than the VP.

10 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

You may be right. Two years is an eternity in politics.

Between the two, Rubio is getting the better reviews so far. As SofS, he can distance himself from any discussion of economic woes more easily than the VP.

They should make a constitutional amendment allowing Mark Carney to run in 2028. I seriously think he'd have a great chance at getting elected.

So impressed with that guy. No noise, no drama, just competently getting on with the (very difficult) job.

35 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Your evidence being.....

I would take you more seriously if YOUR literacy and grammatical competence were a little better, to be honest. I can't make out what you meant by

You prove it with every post.

9 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

They should make a constitutional amendment allowing Mark Carney to run in 2028. I seriously think he'd have a great chance at getting elected.

So impressed with that guy. No noise, no drama, just competently getting on with the (very difficult) job.

I think I have said before, as a Conservative voter for the past several decades, Carney has been better than I had feared. Have to remember that he was first chosen by a Conservative PM to run the Bank of Canada back in the day. His time in Europe was troubling- he was making disturbing Globalist/WEF noises.

But since coming home I think he has rediscovered his roots. The Liberal Party under Trudeau had drifted far to the left of where most Canadians are comfortable. If Carney can get some big energy projects off the ground and improve the economy and national defence, I can overlook his occasional forays into lefty social policies. Plus he is the kind of guy Trump respects- good educational pedigree, economic chops, wealthy. Makes relations easier overall.

Can't expect perfection in a politician.

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

I think I have said before, as a Conservative voter for the past several decades, Carney has been better than I had feared. Have to remember that he was first chosen by a Conservative PM to run the Bank of Canada back in the day. His time in Europe was troubling- he was making disturbing Globalist/WEF noises.

But since coming home I think he has rediscovered his roots. The Liberal Party under Trudeau had drifted far to the left of where most Canadians are comfortable. If Carney can get some big energy projects off the ground and improve the economy and national defence, I can overlook his occasional forays into lefty social policies. Plus he is the kind of guy Trump respects- good educational pedigree, economic chops, wealthy. Makes relations easier overall.

Can't expect perfection in a politician.

Can't expect perfection in anyone. But that doesn't mean one should vote for the complete opposite, like the Americans did twice.

Are people wishing they had voted for kamala?
A cackling half Indian, half Jamaican fermale import married to a jewish man?

She was never even meant to be a serious option (other than for women or coloreds).

Presidents are selected, NOT elected.

11 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Can't expect perfection in anyone. But that doesn't mean one should vote for the complete opposite, like the Americans did twice.

Matter of perception.

Hillary on paper was a great candidate. But the timing was bad. Two Bushes, then two Clintons? That is a hard sell. Plus parties rarely get 3 consecutive terms. She represented politics as usual, which is a losing hand.

Kamala was simply a disaster. Her first attempt at the party leadership in 2020 was a total embarrassment. She was picked for VP as an obvious gift to secure the black vote. As VP she was a non factor at best. And her campaign in 2024? A textbook example of how to fail. Biden fvcked the party by refusing to step aside after one term.

3 hours ago, KhunLA said:

success at ... good in bed, being a woman, multi racial: Indian for the CA voter, and Black for the Southern USA voter, in the national election.

And still failed miserably 🙄

Those were her pluses. Luckily she only dropped the ball a couple times. OK, more than a couple times, from G AI ...

Let's not forget ... total hypocrisy

Do you strain at gnats and swallow camels regularly?

The United States needs multiparty presidential elections. I mean at least a real third party that pulls soft-core conservative Republicans into its ranks and conservative Democrats likewise. Have an election, and if no one candidate from the three parties gets 50% then have a runoff between the top two.

Glass ceilings have to remain intact at all costs, in fact if anything they should be re-enforced:

21 minutes ago, ronnie50 said:

The United States needs multiparty presidential elections. I mean at least a real third party that pulls soft-core conservative Republicans into its ranks and conservative Democrats likewise. Have an election, and if no one candidate from the three parties gets 50% then have a runoff between the top two.

IMHO the whole Election system needs overhaul The Electoral College should be scrapped, candidate who loses the popular vote can still win the election. just stupid !