5 hours ago, rocketboy2 said:

Stop importing the death cult religion followers to the uk.

And no Muslims should be in any government positions, ever.

There religion will influence what they do in these governmental positions, when push comes to shove.

Stop the rot.

Your racism is showing, Whitey!

On 6/16/2026 at 12:19 PM, spidermike007 said:

While there is some absolute truth to what you're saying that does not in any way lesson the impact of dramatically increasing populations around the world. It is my earnest opinion that this planet cannot support more than 8 billion people, and if the population continues to grow the quality of life will diminish for the vast majority of earthlings.

Something must be done to educate illuminate or encourage the poorest of the poor to stop cranking out babies like they are hot brownies from a chocolate factory.

"hot brownies from a chocolate factory", hm, I think I know where you're coming from.

6 hours ago, henryford1958 said:

Just go Bradford, Leicester, Tower Hamlets, Bolton etc and see if it has had any adverse effect on British culture. Within 20 years there will be a civil war as we finally reject the loss of our country.

Only if fomented by malcontent Whites who refuse to share. Not only resources but histories, culture, way of life. Everybody has something to teach the other. Those who would fire up a "civil war" are those not listening.

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Your racism is showing, Whitey!

I had no idea that Muslims were a race.

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

There’s too damned many of us!

We’re all eaters. Where’s the food going to come from?

“Markets, producers, inventors”. Yeah, of what? They just want to sell you something!

Typical brainwashed hippy boomer bull**** BUT quality IS important so
I agree there ARE too many of you - and your type

FWIW, food comes from plants (grows - often naturally) and animals (they can be bred and eaten).
Neither are finite as ****s like you imply.

Energy sources are unlimited (esp with tech) and renewable but are controlled and rationed by selfish old boomer ****s like yourself.

Next!

On 6/16/2026 at 2:39 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s no accident t that the Malthusian argument invariably focuses on the developing world, or more precisely, non white, non Christian populations.

7 hours ago, Mr Awesome said:

How long do you think that part of the world will be "developing"? Maybe a few more centuries?

People from hot places with abundant food just aren't suited to success (other than by poncing) in cooler climates.

Lighter skin people from cold countries developed planning skills over thousands of years.
If they hadn;t they'd have starved to death in the harsh winters.

Its' just not the same when you can pick a banana or mango from your garden - hence coconut heads.
Seemingly unbothered by anthing (really due to lack of thinking capacity).

To be fair, there are places for them - in hot countires where they don't have to compete for (or steal, leech or beg for) resources with higher IQ peoples.

Hey, look, I've seen this map before. It has an uncanny resemblance to many other maps like homicide, grape, freedom index.

International educational assessment like PISA, which tests 15-year-olds in reading, math, and science, and IQ map match.

"But but bu...." Exceptions just prove the rule - I didnt make the rules btw!

Edited June 17Jun 17 by Tourist2

14 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Typical brainwashed hippy boomer bull**** BUT quality IS important so
I agree there ARE too many of you - and your type

FWIW, food comes from plants (grows - often naturally) and animals (they can be bred and eaten).
Neither are finite as ****s like you imply.

Energy sources are unlimited (esp with tech) and renewable but are controlled and rationed by selfish old boomer ****s like yourself.

Next!

You sound like just another greenie who is under the false impression of having received a proper education.

8 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

People from hot places with abundant food just aren't suited to success (other than by poncing) in cooler climates.

Lighter skin people from cold countries developed planning skills over thousands of years.
If they hadn;t they'd have starved to death in the harsh winters.

Its' just not the same when you can pick a banana or mango from your garden - hence coconut heads.
Seemingly unbothered by anthing (really due to lack of thinking capacity).

To be fair, there are places for them - in hot countires where they don't have to compete for (or steal, leech or beg for) resources with higher IQ peoples.

Hey, look, I've seen this map before. It has an uncanny resemblance to many other maps like homicide, grape, freedom index.

International educational assessment like PISA, which tests 15-year-olds in reading, math, and science, and IQ map match.

"But but bu...." Exceptions just prove the rule - I didnt make the rules btw!

Wot iz a grape index?

On 6/16/2026 at 1:48 AM, bannork said:

A major new study has uncovered a troubling fault line in British society, finding that one in six people believe the growth of the Muslim population poses a fundamental threat to UK culture.

..but no problem with the growing number of hot Romanian girls about :)

It isn't a threat if you want to be one of the rabble to do with as they want. Most normal people do not accept that so yes they do see the Muslims as a threat.

57 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Energy sources are unlimited (esp with tech) and renewable but are controlled and rationed by selfish old boomer ****s like yourself.

Rough childhood?

2 hours ago, bannork said:

Wot iz a grape index?

Walkin' on the beaches, lookin' at the peaches...

On 6/15/2026 at 9:26 PM, spidermike007 said:

There's no question that Muslim population growth is an existential threat to humanity, but so is population growth in general.

21 out of 22 nations in Africa that have the highest population growth levels on the planet are Muslim majority nations. That is a huge problem. The world needs fewer babies, not more babies.

and these poor countries want to move to europe as global warming will get worse with no water

7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which is a long way from being able to feed its own children:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9417167/

This is BS women with children have access to so many social programs.

The study you linked, trying to be clever, is weak sauce. It’s a survey done in one area. They did not actually show up and take any metrics. If you feel the need to argue about this, I look forward to it.

Methods: The study group included 328 parents and children from a CCHIP study of families with at least 1 child under the age of 12 years living in the city of Pittsburgh and the surrounding Allegheny County. A two-stage area probability sampling design with standard cluster techniques was used. All parents whose child was between the ages of 6 and 12 years at the time of interview were asked to complete a Pediatric Symptom Checklist, a brief parent-report questionnaire that assesses children's emotional and behavioral symptoms. Hunger status was defined by parent responses to the standard 8 food-insufficiency questions from the CCHIP survey that are used to classify households and children as "hungry," "at-risk for hunger," or "not hungry."

2 hours ago, bannork said:

Wot iz a grape index?

It’s code for rape.

http://chartsbin.com/view/38592

Edited June 17Jun 17 by Mr Awesome

1 hour ago, Mr Awesome said:

It’s code for rape.

http://chartsbin.com/view/38592

Does there have to be bunch of them?

A poll shows 17% (16.66%) have an opinion on something, 83% take an opposite view. A Pint half Empty headline.

Headlines pronounce that Labour or the Tories are tacking at 20% or less in polls, and hence are doomed.

Other recent survey results

Britons opposed to an AI tax on work done by AI rather than humans: 22%

Britons who think Keir Starmer is doing well as Prime Minister: 22%

Britons who think Kemi Badenoch looks like a prime minister in waiting: 22%

Britons favouring cannabis decriminalisation (rather than legalisation or criminalisation: 23%

Britons supporting slavery reparations payments: 24%

Young adults (16-29) who believe talent and hard work are fairly rewarded in Britain: 25%

Britons with a favourable opinion of Keir Starmer: 18%

Britons who think the UK is doing "too much" on climate action: 20%

Britons who think their local economy is getting better: 21%

Britons who message m: 14%ore than they did a year ago: 24^

Gen Z Britons who use AI to rewrite or edit messages: 17%

Gen Z who say messaging has not replaced phone calls: 21%

Britons confident Labour will significantly improve the cost of living by 2029: 14%

Britons who think the government is handling the cost of living well: 10%

Reform UK voters who support rejoining the EU: 18%

Britons who have used AI for advice on personal problems: 18%

Britons who think single life is better than being in a relationship: 19%

Britons who spend more than four hours per day on media activities: 19%

Britons who say they cannot afford a summer holiday this year: 20%

Virtually every one of these, if forming a headline, would be accompanied by "Only".

(except that YouGov/Best for Britain survey on Reform voter support for the EU, which surprised me)

6 hours ago, Tourist2 said:

Typical brainwashed hippy boomer bull**** BUT quality IS important so
I agree there ARE too many of you - and your type

FWIW, food comes from plants (grows - often naturally) and animals (they can be bred and eaten).
Neither are finite as ****s like you imply.

Energy sources are unlimited (esp with tech) and renewable but are controlled and rationed by selfish old boomer ****s like yourself.

Next!

Reported

I had no idea that Muslims were a race.

Many people who insist they are not racist because "Islam isn't a race" end up treating Muslims exactly as though they were one. They do not stop to ask what an individual believes, whether they are devout, secular, liberal, conservative, or even Muslim at all; instead, they lump together hundreds of millions of people from dozens of countries, ethnicities and cultures into a single, suspect category.

A Bosnian, an Arab, a Pakistani, a Black African and a white convert can all be viewed through the same lens of prejudice. Being Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Salafist, Wahabist, Deoband, Nation of Islam, Ahmadiyya, Alawite, Druzem non-denominational makes no difference. "Rockboy2"'s contradiction is obvious: he claims to oppose only a religion, but he actually stereotypes, judges and distrusts people on the basis of ancestry, appearance, names and perceived group identity.

5 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

A poll shows 17% (16.66%) have an opinion on something, 83% take an opposite view. A Pint half Empty headline.

Headlines pronounce that Labour or the Tories are tacking at 20% or less in polls, and hence are doomed.

Other recent survey results

Britons opposed to an AI tax on work done by AI rather than humans: 22%

Britons who think Keir Starmer is doing well as Prime Minister: 22%

Britons who think Kemi Badenoch looks like a prime minister in waiting: 22%

Britons favouring cannabis decriminalisation (rather than legalisation or criminalisation: 23%

Britons supporting slavery reparations payments: 24%

Young adults (16-29) who believe talent and hard work are fairly rewarded in Britain: 25%

Britons with a favourable opinion of Keir Starmer: 18%

Britons who think the UK is doing "too much" on climate action: 20%

Britons who think their local economy is getting better: 21%

Britons who message m: 14%ore than they did a year ago: 24^

Gen Z Britons who use AI to rewrite or edit messages: 17%

Gen Z who say messaging has not replaced phone calls: 21%

Britons confident Labour will significantly improve the cost of living by 2029: 14%

Britons who think the government is handling the cost of living well: 10%

Reform UK voters who support rejoining the EU: 18%

Britons who have used AI for advice on personal problems: 18%

Britons who think single life is better than being in a relationship: 19%

Britons who spend more than four hours per day on media activities: 19%

Britons who say they cannot afford a summer holiday this year: 20%

Virtually every one of these, if forming a headline, would be accompanied by "Only".

(except that YouGov/Best for Britain survey on Reform voter support for the EU, which surprised me)

All nonsense since 'Briton / British' does NOT mean what it used to.

Eg. The 24% of bRiTonS support rapper rations are obviously invaders hoping for a benefits top up.

14 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

"hot brownies from a chocolate factory", hm, I think I know where you're coming from.

As in super casual, as in never ever once pondered how are we going to support all these children, how are we going to deal with the expense if something tragic occurs, and where is all the money going to come from?

3 hours ago, Tourist2 said:

All nonsense since 'Briton / British' does NOT mean what it used to.

Eg. The 24% of bRiTonS support rapper rations are obviously invaders hoping for a benefits top up.

"Rapper Rations"; do you mean byte samples of Hip Hop music, like Eminem, Goldie Lookin' Chain and other such popular acts?

That data relates to the a non-British country. To support your point, provide UK-sourced data. There is also no scale. I assume you have studied the raw data to have the confidence to reproduce and defend the infographic you copied.

What is the definition, in this context, of "Mean ratings"?

What is the basis of "rate each other"; is this an assessment of sporting prowess, musical skills etc? I expect you can respond quite quickly, as no one would reproduce analytics like this without understanding the underlying data.

In relation to the United Kingdom, what is the relevance of "Hispanics"? UK census data gives some indication of the number of Spanish Nationals in the UK, amounting to about 0.26% of the UK population. Is this the source of your angst; worry about 0.26% of the population.

FYI, "Asian" has a different definition in US studies from the UK, so I don't think you can really relate this to the UK, unless you are forming a comment on the ethnic Chinese population in the UK, who amount to about 0.7% of the population.

Additionally, in your analysis, given your access to the raw data, can you provide comment, within the White population, similar ratings extending to people of a Celtic ethnicity, Anglo-Saxon ethnicity, Polish ethnicity and Other White ethnicity (if your data goes deeper than that, please share). For instance, attitudes of Scottish people towards English.

Rape gangs in Britain. Report says at least 250,000 victims by gangs almost entirely composed of Muslims.

Full report-219 pages. Some very disturbing reading in this.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

19 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Only if fomented by malcontent Whites who refuse to share. Not only resources but histories, culture, way of life. Everybody has something to teach the other. Those who would fire up a "civil war" are those not listening.

Maybe consider replacing "refuse to share" with "refuse to submit". Then more might listen.

On 6/17/2026 at 6:46 AM, rocketboy2 said:

Stop importing the death cult religion followers to the uk.

And no Muslims should be in any government positions, ever.

There religion will influence what they do in these governmental positions, when push comes to shove.

Stop the rot.

I am old enough to remember Muammar Gaddafi saying Muslims have no need to go to war with the West. He reckoned their birth rate would soon eclipse that of other religions and they would control other countries through the ballot box.

6 minutes ago, mikebell said:

I am old enough to remember Muammar Gaddafi saying Muslims have no need to go to war with the West. He reckoned their birth rate would soon eclipse that of other religions and they would control other countries through the ballot box.

Yes.

Already starting to happen in the uk.

Just look at the green party.

now the back door Muslim party.

Edited June 18Jun 18 by rocketboy2

15 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Rape gangs in Britain. Report says at least 250,000 victims by gangs almost entirely composed of Muslims.

Full report-219 pages. Some very disturbing reading in this.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

To save people clicking, this is Rupert Lowe's report, though the poster chooses not to identify it as such, in order to obfuscate.

This report is not the source of the 250,000 claim. The claim comes from Lord Rannoch, during a 2019 debate on "Grooming Gangs". Lowe's report almost copies his Lordship's words during the debate. Indeed, the report acknowledges this claim on page 13. The report claims an extrapolation of 1400 cases in 2014 and 1000 cases in 2022 support this estimate.

But this claim is not without dispute.

https://www.thejournal.ie/250000-victims-of-grooming-gangs-in-the-uk-lord-pearson-of-rannoch-statistics-elon-musk-6596961-Jan2025/

The office of Lord Rannoch provided an explanation of their estimate:

A representative for the office of Pearson emailed The Journal to explain how the figure of 250,000 was derived.

The response starts by noting that it is difficult to estimate the number of victims nationally, before stating:

“Professor Jay’s report ‘conservatively’ identified 1,400 child abuse victims during the period 1999 to 2013 out of a Rotherham population of around 255,000. Jayne Senior reckons the figure should be “at least 1,700… and could be up to 2,000 victims”. If we assume the real figure is mid-point 1,700, then 0.07% of the total Rotherham population suffered at the hands of the rape gangs during those 14 years. More, of course, have suffered before and since.

“Extrapolated across the UK, which proportionately has a lower Pakistani but higher Muslim population than Rotherham, the national figure would be 440,000 victims.

“Telford has a population of 170,000 and, from reports, 1,000 victims. Extrapolated across the UK, this would imply 388,000 victims nationally.”

“Oxford has a population of 152,000 and 373 identified victims according to the Safeguarding Board’s Serious Case Review – but with many more hidden and unidentified children who have suffered too, no doubt. Extrapolated, even these conservative SCR figures indicate that there are 162,000 victims nationally.”

“From the above and other evidence, it is safe to assume that there are at least a quarter of a million (250,000) child victims of rape gangs across the UK.”

There is obviously a glaring, GCSE maths error in that statement, which some argue would make the problem appear 10x worse (calculating percentages correctly would indicated 2.5 million victims). That does mean that the problem must be even worse, but it does raise a big red flag over the model developed to come up with the estimate.

The critique argues that Lord Rannoch's estimate of 250,000 victims is methodologically flawed because it extrapolates from inquiries into three exceptional and geographically diverse areas; Rotherham, Telford and Oxfordshire, which were investigated precisely because they were major child sexual exploitation (CSE) hotspots.

The figures used in these reports relate to all forms of CSE, not specifically to organised "grooming gangs", Muslim or Pakistani perpetrators, or white victims.

None of the reports break down victim numbers by perpetrators' ethnicity, and the Oxfordshire figure was also misapplied by treating it as relating only to the city of Oxford rather than the much larger county.

Since there is no national estimate for victims of grooming gangs as a distinct category, the critique contends that Bannoch conflates overall CSE with a much narrower subset of offending and then projects rates observed in notorious hotspots onto the entire UK population without evidence that these areas are representative, producing an unreliable national estimate.

There is no doubt a serious issue of child sexual abuse. But that is not news. Rannoch's estimates, repeated by Lowe's report. All this report does is take the same sources as Rannoch. It accepts Rannoch's estimates largely without question, and provides no additional statistics to corroborate those estimates. The report consists of mostly anecdotes, sad and shocking as they are. The report contain a cod-theological analysis of Islam and British legislation.

Its also important to understand that the 250,000 claim is not an estimate that 250,000 girls now have been the victim of "Pakistani Grooming Gangs", but this is a number based over a 30 year period. Over a 30 year period, there would have been about 15 million falling into the age cohort considered.

Obviously this claims to be an independent inquiry, not supported by the authorities, and it needed a Crowd Funder to commission it. The panel consisted of:

• Sammy Woodhouse: A survivor of the child sexual exploitation scandal in Rotherham who has become a campaigner on child sexual abuse issues. She chaired or led the inquiry panel.

• Nat Enderby-Shenton: Describes herself as "Rotherham whistle blower". She works for children's services at Staffordshire County Council

• Marlon West: A parent of a grooming victim

• Debra Sudbury: Previously a Community Psychiatric Nurse for the Rotherham Criminal Justice Liaison Service. Now retired.

• Julie Ballan: Unknown

Editorial team:

• Charlie Downes: Campaigns Director and Spokesman for Restore Britain

• Joshua Ferme: Psychologist, TV presenter, and journalist. Main host of The Lotus Eaters. Youtuber. While he has not identified himself as a Restore Britain supporter, he is described as "right-wing, national-conservative and libertarian-leaning"

• Harrison Pitt: Writer and senior fellow at Restore Britain

• Graham Smith: Barrister

The Inquiry Panel are emotionally invested in the topic for various reasons. The editorial team has a distinct political bias aligned with Mr Lowe.

This cannot be described as an Independent Inquiry. No doubt its findings will be submitted to the actual Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs.

Those with a genuine interest can follow it here:

https://www.grooming-gangs.independent-inquiry.uk/

If anyone on this forum wishes to submit evidence, they can, via a form.

The panel and their bios:

https://www.grooming-gangs.independent-inquiry.uk/chair-and-panel/

It will run for 3 years, so will present findings after the next General Election.

https://x.com/Femi_Mohammed1/status/2066891992949215573?s=20

My name is Femi Mohammed and I am speaking up in response to the Rape Gang Inquiry Report as the only Pakistani Muslim Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) and grooming gang survivor currently in the public domain, and to explain how as a participant, I have been manipulated and silenced by MP Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry.

In August 2025, I was selected to take part in @RupertLowe10’s Rape Gang Inquiry by Sammy Woodhouse. She advised me not to disclose my CSE at the age of 17, during which I was trafficked for 18 years by an ethnically white grooming gang because she claimed it did not meet the required threshold. She and the Rape Gang Inquiry were interested in my recent cases, in which as a vulnerable adult, I was sexually assaulted and threats were made against my life by a Pakistani Conservative public figure.

I shared details of my experiences and submitted my official evidence to the Rape Gang Inquiry over a six-month period, after which I was invited to attend the Inquiry hearings in February 2026, and my travel arrangements were made. However, shortly before the hearings, I was removed without explanation or justification. I believe the decision to exclude me came from the highest level of the Inquiry.

In May 2026, I was informed that not only was I a child at the time of my trafficking and grooming, but that my case should also have been included in the Rape Gang Inquiry. Its exclusion was not a simple oversight; in my view, it concealed the reality that a Muslim child had been groomed and trafficked by white perpetrators. What is concerning is why the Rape Gang Inquiry covered up my child grooming and trafficking by white gangs and then suppressed my participation involving a member of the Conservative Party.

While Rupert Lowe publicly claimed the inquiry would name and shame the authorities who failed victims, my cases gave him the perfect opportunity to do exactly that, yet my experience was sidelined to protect the very institutions they claimed they wanted to expose. As Muslim women, we are spoken on behalf of by those who seek to use our abuse and trauma to further their own agendas and public image. One minute we are called victims of Pakistani grooming gangs; the next, it is said that Pakistani men do not target Muslim women and children because they respect us too much.

What is never allowed to be brought to public attention is that there are Pakistani Muslim child sexual exploitation survivors, like myself, who are victims of white grooming gangs.

The hate comments I have received from Rupert Lowe’s Restore Party members have left me deeply troubled by the hostility, racism and exclusion I have faced since I have publicly spoken about my experiences at the hands of his Rape Gang Inquiry. Comments stating that I "didn't fit the narrative" because the focus was on white victims reinforce the perception that some Restore supporters believe survivors like me have less value, less credibility, or less right to participate because of our race, ethnicity, or faith. I have also been subjected to attacks on my religion and Muslim faith.

Disagreeing with me is one thing; suggesting that because of my faith I do not belong in this conversation because I am Muslim, is another. Such attitudes are divisive, discriminatory, and harmful. I am speaking up in the public interest because remaining silent risks leaving countless other Muslim victims and survivors trapped in a devastating cycle of abuse and danger. We cannot afford the cost of silence. The public, who financially contributed to this Inquiry, have an absolute right to know the truth of what I have been subjected to. I have documented my experience in MP Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry, included supporting evidence of my participation and published my story.

Obviously the issue is the lack of reliable data, creating an opportunity for bad faith actors like Lowe, who really is only interested in political opportunism.

Obviously the issue is the lack of reliable data, creating an opportunity for bad faith actors like Lowe, who really is only interested in political opportunism.

Lefties and other globalists are going to wrap themselves up into pretzels looking for "flaws in the math". And the MSM is going to do their best to bury it. But it is happening, and in big numbers.

Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream media is ignoring — RT World News

17 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

To save people clicking, this is Rupert Lowe's report, though the poster chooses not to identify it as such, in order to obfuscate.

This report is not the source of the 250,000 claim. The claim comes from Lord Rannoch, during a 2019 debate on "Grooming Gangs". Lowe's report almost copies his Lordship's words during the debate. Indeed, the report acknowledges this claim on page 13. The report claims an extrapolation of 1400 cases in 2014 and 1000 cases in 2022 support this estimate.

But this claim is not without dispute.

https://www.thejournal.ie/250000-victims-of-grooming-gangs-in-the-uk-lord-pearson-of-rannoch-statistics-elon-musk-6596961-Jan2025/

The office of Lord Rannoch provided an explanation of their estimate:

There is obviously a glaring, GCSE maths error in that statement, which some argue would make the problem appear 10x worse (calculating percentages correctly would indicated 2.5 million victims). That does mean that the problem must be even worse, but it does raise a big red flag over the model developed to come up with the estimate.

The critique argues that Lord Rannoch's estimate of 250,000 victims is methodologically flawed because it extrapolates from inquiries into three exceptional and geographically diverse areas; Rotherham, Telford and Oxfordshire, which were investigated precisely because they were major child sexual exploitation (CSE) hotspots.

The figures used in these reports relate to all forms of CSE, not specifically to organised "grooming gangs", Muslim or Pakistani perpetrators, or white victims.

None of the reports break down victim numbers by perpetrators' ethnicity, and the Oxfordshire figure was also misapplied by treating it as relating only to the city of Oxford rather than the much larger county.

Since there is no national estimate for victims of grooming gangs as a distinct category, the critique contends that Bannoch conflates overall CSE with a much narrower subset of offending and then projects rates observed in notorious hotspots onto the entire UK population without evidence that these areas are representative, producing an unreliable national estimate.

There is no doubt a serious issue of child sexual abuse. But that is not news. Rannoch's estimates, repeated by Lowe's report. All this report does is take the same sources as Rannoch. It accepts Rannoch's estimates largely without question, and provides no additional statistics to corroborate those estimates. The report consists of mostly anecdotes, sad and shocking as they are. The report contain a cod-theological analysis of Islam and British legislation.

Its also important to understand that the 250,000 claim is not an estimate that 250,000 girls now have been the victim of "Pakistani Grooming Gangs", but this is a number based over a 30 year period. Over a 30 year period, there would have been about 15 million falling into the age cohort considered.

Obviously this claims to be an independent inquiry, not supported by the authorities, and it needed a Crowd Funder to commission it. The panel consisted of:

• Sammy Woodhouse: A survivor of the child sexual exploitation scandal in Rotherham who has become a campaigner on child sexual abuse issues. She chaired or led the inquiry panel.

• Nat Enderby-Shenton: Describes herself as "Rotherham whistle blower". She works for children's services at Staffordshire County Council

• Marlon West: A parent of a grooming victim

• Debra Sudbury: Previously a Community Psychiatric Nurse for the Rotherham Criminal Justice Liaison Service. Now retired.

• Julie Ballan: Unknown

Editorial team:

• Charlie Downes: Campaigns Director and Spokesman for Restore Britain

• Joshua Ferme: Psychologist, TV presenter, and journalist. Main host of The Lotus Eaters. Youtuber. While he has not identified himself as a Restore Britain supporter, he is described as "right-wing, national-conservative and libertarian-leaning"

• Harrison Pitt: Writer and senior fellow at Restore Britain

• Graham Smith: Barrister

The Inquiry Panel are emotionally invested in the topic for various reasons. The editorial team has a distinct political bias aligned with Mr Lowe.

This cannot be described as an Independent Inquiry. No doubt its findings will be submitted to the actual Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs.

Those with a genuine interest can follow it here:

https://www.grooming-gangs.independent-inquiry.uk/

If anyone on this forum wishes to submit evidence, they can, via a form.

The panel and their bios:

https://www.grooming-gangs.independent-inquiry.uk/chair-and-panel/

It will run for 3 years, so will present findings after the next General Election.

https://x.com/Femi_Mohammed1/status/2066891992949215573?s=20

Obviously the issue is the lack of reliable data, creating an opportunity for bad faith actors like Lowe, who really is only interested in political opportunism.

Good post. Also worth reading is the 'MasterDebunker's analysis on X

• Not a formal inquiry: The report is a privately produced document led by a sitting MP with clear political views, not a statutory public inquiry with legal powers, independent oversight, or official status.

• Anecdotal evidence reliance: It depends heavily on survivor and whistleblower testimonies without transparent selection, verification, or sampling methods, leaving it vulnerable to bias and difficult to corroborate at scale.

• Weak national estimates: Claims such as 250,000 victims are extrapolations from limited local data rather than results from systematic national statistics or rigorous quantitative analysis.

• Over-extension of conviction data: It takes solid conviction samples (e.g. 84% South Asian in reviewed cases) and stretches them into wider claims about overall perpetrator proportions that the data cannot fully support.

• Interpretive sections over-reach: Chapters linking issues to Islamic doctrine or Muslim culture present contested cultural arguments as straightforward analysis, with limited engagement of counter-evidence or alternative explanations.

• Narrow scope: It focuses almost exclusively on one demographic profile of group-based grooming while giving far less attention to other major forms of child sexual exploitation shown in official data.

• Poor methodological transparency: There is no clear methods section explaining data collection, inclusion criteria, or how conclusions were reached, making the report read as advocacy rather than formal research.

• Confirmation bias in structure: The organisation and emphasis appear designed to reinforce a pre-existing narrative (political correctness + specific cultural factors) rather than neutrally examining multiple causes.

• Limited new contribution: Much of the strongest content simply restates findings from earlier official inquiries (Jay, Telford, Casey); the added value is mainly compiled testimony and interpretive framing rather than fresh empirical work.

• https://x.com/Master_Debunker

37 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

To save people clicking, this is Rupert Lowe's report, though the poster chooses not to identify it as such, in order to obfuscate.

Strawmanning. Rape gangs exist, are known to exist and are predominately Muslim mainly from Pakistan. This is irrefutable. Although the figure can be disputed does it matter? 250,00/25,000/2,500/250. Whatever the number girls were being raped by Muslim rape gangs.