Good post. Also worth reading is the 'MasterDebunker's analysis on X

See... I told you. Wrapping themselves up into pretzels in the minutiae, while ignoring that it did happen, and it's still happening. In big numbers. Whether that's 25,000, 250,000 or 2,500,000 victims. And whether it's 90% Pakistani or 80% Pakistani or Muslim.

5 hours ago, impulse said:

Lefties and other globalists are going to wrap themselves up into pretzels looking for "flaws in the math". And the MSM is going to do their best to bury it. But it is happening, and in big numbers.

Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream media is ignoring — RT World News

For those unaware; RT News is a Russian Government funded news service, sanctioned in many countries, and so the link posted has been automatically deleted in the post for some forum users.

5 hours ago, impulse said:

See... I told you. Wrapping themselves up into pretzels in the minutiae, while ignoring that it did happen, and it's still happening. In big numbers. Whether that's 25,000, 250,000 or 2,500,000 victims. And whether it's 90% Pakistani or 80% Pakistani or Muslim.

And the properly established Independent Public Enquiry (budget £65m) which commenced in 13 April 2026, will issue a full report in time. Just be patient and not distracted by Rupert Lowe's nonsense.

5 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Strawmanning. Rape gangs exist, are known to exist and are predominately Muslim mainly from Pakistan. This is irrefutable. Although the figure can be disputed does it matter? 250,00/25,000/2,500/250. Whatever the number girls were being raped by Muslim rape gangs.

I have not carried out a Strawman argument.

A strawman (or straw man) is a logical fallacy and rhetorical device where someone misrepresents or exaggerates an opponent's actual argument.

What you did was post a link, without attribution, from an unofficial looking link, without much explanation about the authorship, nor a decent summary. Not everyone opens every link posted on the forum.

If I was to Strawman you, I would ask why are you intent on protecting White boy rape gangs? That's a Strawman.

I've already referred to the actual enquiry, that kicked off in October 2025. This study will no doubt be submitted, and considered alongside other evidences and studies.

The so called "irrefutable" statement you made is uncertain. That's why an Inquiry is being held. Even Mr Lowe complains that the authorities did not collect sufficient data, hence the rather patchy estimates.

So it is by no means certain that "Rape gangs exist, are known to exist and are predominately Muslim mainly from Pakistan" is irrefutable. And, indeed, even in your reply, you concede that as few as 250 victims might be the victims of such gangs, implying that you believe its possible that the total number of victims over a 30 year period (the scope of the report you provided a link to) is less than 500 across all kinds of rape gangs, be they Pakistani, Cockney, Scouser, Brummie, Geordie, Glaswegian, Larne, Londonderry/Derry (not sure where you stand on that), Welsh, Mancunian and so forth.

The Inquiry, which will be under Oath, will get to the root of the issue.

For those unaware; RT News is a Russian Government funded news service, sanctioned in many countries, and so the link posted has been automatically deleted in the post for some forum users.

I notice that you didn't claim they're wrong. Just that it's a Russkie news source.

And the properly established Independent Public Enquiry (budget £65m) which commenced in 13 April 2026, will issue a full report in time. Just be patient and not distracted by Rupert Lowe's nonsense.

Between you and me, I'd trust a crowd funded $600K report more than a party funded $70 million report.

7 minutes ago, impulse said:

I notice that you didn't claim they're wrong. Just that it's a Russkie news source.

Between you and me, I'd trust a crowd funded $600K report more than a party funded $70 million report.

I can't tell if the Russian report is incorrect. I have made no comment on the veracity of their reportage, except that they are funded by the Russian Government, and are sanctioned. The link has literally been stripped, and is unreachable. I assume this is something enabled by the hosting service, to block certain links from certain countries, as I explained.

The Inquiry you referred to took considerably more than US, Canadian, Australian or HK $600,000. You have your currencies mixed up, or, likely, you are not British.

I am not aware that The Statutory Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs is wholly funded by the Labour Party. Please provide the documents that you found that indicate that.

Assuming you are thinking of USD, then you believe that about £53m (based on prevailing exchange rates) of the reported £65m cost of the Inquiry (I think the actual cost will rise), has come from the Labour Party, and not the taxpayer (the costs are covered from the Home Office budget, which technically isn't wholly taxpayer funded, but which could also claim to receive funding va the levying of visa fees (though maybe all that money actually goes straight to the Treasury, in much the same way VAT on Independent Schools and Car Tax goes to the Treasury, and not the respective departments).

I find it strange that you are calling for such significant inquiries to be constrained in budget. £65,000,000 is considerably more than £600,000, and unlike the report you referred to, will be able to access non-public data sets compiled by national and local government and law enforcement, as well as compel witnesses, under oath. Mr Lowe's report will no doubt be considered in the round, and the witnesses named in the report will likely be invited to come before the Inquiry.

21 hours ago, Mr Awesome said:

It’s code for rape.

http://chartsbin.com/view/38592

Wow, that rape map is horrific. I would never have expected México to be so much worse than the rest of South America. And China! Thanks for this.

But, why say "grape"???

Edited June 18Jun 18 by unblocktheplanet
add

50 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

For those unaware; RT News is a Russian Government funded news service, sanctioned in many countries, and so the link posted has been automatically deleted in the post for some forum users.

Will you please post the RT URL again and give the exact title in case AN's system deletes it.

I’m more than normally confused.

Are you saying 250k women raped per year, meaning 15M over a 30-year period?

Are “grooming gangs” the same as “rape gangs”? And where does the “gang” part fit in? Does that mean they “groom” or “rape” as a group? Or the groups selects victims to target? Or?

“Groom” is usually applied to those targeting underage victims. So are these two separate concepts?

Doesn’t really add up to me. Rape is a crime of violence not passion. That’s why 82-year old grannies get raped. To show power over someone.

Do we know whether this concept or reality existed before wholesale immigration to the UK? Incidentally, does this phenomenon occur only in the UK or other countries as well?

Femi Muhammad’s case is quite curious. “Trafficked” at age 17 by a “Pakistani Grooming Gang” but stayed on the game for 18 years!?! Who was “sexually assaulted” and “threatened with death” by a “Pakistani Conservative” politician?!? Whoo boy! Lucy got some splainin’ to do! Muslim ‘child’ groomed by White Brits. Whew!

We're men. We all know that "no" does not always mean no, but sometimes "no" really does mean no.

That's why drinking and screwing are a bad combo! You won't have a good performance review, you won't remember it and it's likelier you've made some unfortunate decisions. (She said she was 18!)

Two good friends were rape victims, one of gang rape. Women are afraid enough being alone. After rape, being alone is impossible.

I'm not a hard man if a woman says no. It's not in my nature. Yeah, it's uncomfortable for both but there are lots of other willing volunteers. I have never forced myself on any woman.

So it's impenetrable for me to understand a guy who gets off on the power and violence of rape. Let alone those who fantasise as a group about a rape victim.

Anybody else?

4 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Wow, that rape map is horrific. I would never have expected México to be so much worse than the rest of South America. And China! Thanks for this.

But, why say "grape"???

They say “grape” because of YouTube and TikTok. The accurate word causes problems with the filters. If you watch YouTube, you will notice they have substituted “unalive” for “killed.”

2 minutes ago, Mr Awesome said:

They say “grape” because of YouTube and TikTok. The accurate word causes problems with the filters. If you watch YouTube, you will notice they have substituted “unalive” for “killed.”

Wouldn't want to cause the weak of heart palpitations!

The link has literally been stripped, and is unreachable.

That's an idiosyncrasy of the site. If you edit a post with a link, it strips the URL part and you have to copy and repaste the link again.

Will you please post the RT URL again and give the exact title in case AN's system deletes it

Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream media is ignoring — RT World News

The rape gang crisis: How the UK betrayed its own people — RT World News

These URLs should be good unless I edit the post without repasting them.

14 hours ago, impulse said:

That's an idiosyncrasy of the site. If you edit a post with a link, it strips the URL part and you have to copy and repaste the link again.

Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream media is ignoring — RT World News

The rape gang crisis: How the UK betrayed its own people — RT World News

These URLs should be good unless I edit the post without repasting them.

I hardly ever get any joy on clickthroughs from hyperlinks on AN. (I hope the titles of my posts don share that fate!)

Yours didn't clickthrough for me but I easily found them by title.

I like RT as part of my news. Not all propaganda but I wouldn't trust them on Ukraine!

On 6/16/2026 at 8:45 AM, Nick Carter icp said:

People in the West/USA cause the most environmental damage ?

Muslims going to the West/USA cause the same amount of enviromental damage .

So, it would be better for the environment if Muslims stayed at home in their own countries

Absolutely.

And they would probably have stayed in their own countries, if the West/USA wouldn´t have bombed them back to stone age, pretending to be helping them become democracies (as if that ever happened before) or to be looking for weapons of mass destruction (while everybody knew there were none), or as right now, if the West/USA would not have been complicit in a mass murder of women and children including massive land theft calling it self-defense.

18 hours ago, impulse said:

That's an idiosyncrasy of the site. If you edit a post with a link, it strips the URL part and you have to copy and repaste the link again.

Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream media is ignoring — RT World News

The rape gang crisis: How the UK betrayed its own people — RT World News

These URLs should be good unless I edit the post without repasting them.

The Russian government written Op-Eds remain blocked/stripped. When you copy paste a URL, you are always given the option to post the full URL, or, if on a PC, right click Paste without Formatting.

On 6/17/2026 at 6:46 AM, rocketboy2 said:

Stop importing the death cult religion followers to the uk.

And no Muslims should be in any government positions, ever.

I hear and read that a lot.

But as I never parrot other peoples "wisdoms" and always try to form my own opinion based on facts and logic, I fail to understand, why Islam is a death cult and ask myself if those using that phrase know anything about Islam.

death cult in what way?

1. worshipping death in form of killing others

   Both Christianity and Islam see the killing of innocents as a sin but Christianity teaches to love your enemy while Islam allows you to fight him.

   Then again, when you look at the practical application of religion in living history, Christians have killed way more Muslims and destroyed their countries than the other way around.

2. worshipping death in form of being killed by others

   Both religions glorify martyrs who died in the name of God or denying to convert

3. worshipping death in form of being killed while trying to kill others

Other than Christianity which knows only strictly passive martyrdom and does not actively seek out death, Islam glorifies those who died fighting for Islam and their country.

And we don´t? Do we not worship those, who made the ultimate sacrifice while defending our country and families against evil powers as our greatest heroes?

Even if they died, not exactly while defending our country but more likely while invading another country, full of evil people, aka as insurgents, who were actually really defending their country and their families, which makes them the heroes and us the evil invaders, but let´s not get distracted by trivialities.

And let us not forget one important fact:

Jesus was a Zombie.

I mean, he came back from the dead, that´s textbook Zombie.

Now, which side was the death cult again?

2 hours ago, Somjot said:

Now, which side was the death cult again?

Islam.

38 minutes ago, temuFarang said:

Islam.

"What exactly do you mean by a 'death cult'? Do you mean believing in an afterlife? Honouring people who die for their faith or community? Being willing to sacrifice one's life for a cause judged to be just? Because if that's your definition, then you've just indicted much of human civilisation.

Do Christians who venerate martyrs belong to a death cult? Are Jews who honour those who died sanctifying God's name members of a death cult? Are nations that build monuments to fallen soldiers, observe remembrance days, and teach children that dying for one's country can be noble also death cults?

Or is Islam uniquely a 'death cult' simply because it's Islam?

If your definition is broad enough to encompass virtually every major religion and every patriotic tradition, then the phrase has lost any analytical meaning and become little more than a slur. If, on the other hand, you have a narrower definition in mind, then state it clearly and explain why it applies to the world's 2 billion Muslims, most of whom spend their lives doing exactly what everyone else does: raising families, earning a living, seeking an education, caring for their parents, and hoping to live long, meaningful, and prosperous lives.

So the question isn't really whether Islam is a death cult. The question is whether you're using a consistent standard, or simply applying a label to Muslims that you would never dream of applying to people who share your own religion, nation, or cultural background."

One in six people in the UK also believe The Government is hiding the “real truth” about COVID origins, ie Fauci funded GoF viral research in Wuhan which was intentionally released in order to "control" people by having them walk around with a paper diaper on their beautiful faces.

You <deleted> daff whingers.

WHY WE CARE ABOUT WUT BRITISH KNOB HEADS BELIEVE

😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣

4 hours ago, Somjot said:

I hear and read that a lot.

Ok.

Jesus was a Zombie, that is a little bit funny.

But as for his counterpart.

You know the PDF file, who had sex with a 9 year old child.

and a warlord who murdered thousands and thousands of people, who did not share his views. We won't go into the nasty things he did to little boys or just killed them, if of a certain age.

Islam is so cool.

But it has no place in the uk.

I can't remember reading, about that old bearded zombie going around and do the likes of the things above.

Good day.

Edited June 21Jun 21 by rocketboy2

On 6/15/2026 at 9:39 PM, Chomper Higgot said:

Babies born in the USA have significantly larger impact on the planet than those born in Africa.

It’s no accident t that the Malthusian argument invariably focuses on the developing world, or more precisely, non white, non Christian populations.

The very people who are not doing most of the environmental damage.

Another attempt to justify the horrific environmental destruction that China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines are causing. They are the countries dumping raw sewage and industrial wastes. China is the world's largest builder of coal fired facilities parts of the world are drowning in plastic waste and it is not white christian populations. The sub- sahara has the world's largest population growth, yet it cannot sustain itself and is quickly destroying arable land and water sources.

16 hours ago, rocketboy2 said:

Ok.

Jesus was a Zombie, that is a little bit funny.

But as for his counterpart.

You know the PDF file, who had sex with a 9 year old child.

"PDF file", took a while until the penny finally dropped

OK, let me put that into some perspective:

Strong Historical Evidence is supporting a higher age for Aisha and when adjusted for actual birth years, this could place her at approximately 17 or 18 at the time of marriage.

Key evidences being:

1. Traditionally at that time Arab girls-especially among the nobility-began counting their age from the onset of puberty, typically marked by a ceremony called Mu'ay, not from birth.

2. The Age Gap with Her Sister Asma (RA) was 10 years, who was 27 years old at the time of the Hijra making Aisha 17.

3. Historical texts confirm that Aisha (RA) was among the early converts to Islam, in the first few years after revelation (610 CE). If she really was only 9 when the marriage was consummated then her birth year would be 614 which does not add up.

4. After Mohammed`s death Aisha was politically active. She is credited with narrating over 2,000 hadiths covering not only aspects of Muhammad's personal life but also legal, ritual, and theological subjects such as inheritance, pilgrimage, prayer and eschatology. That in addition to her intellectual abilities and knowledge of poetry, medicine, and Islamic jurisprudence which were praised by early scholars does not sound like a traumatized rape victim to me.

Most likely her allegedly extreme young age by the time of her marriage was just a connotation to her virginity and, more than that, religious purity.

Sounds familiar?

Rumor has it that there is a religion claiming that their prophet was born to a virgin mother.

This prophet was born in Bethlehem, which makes him a Palestinian.

What's even weirder is that Western people just do not care about the fate of the Palestinians and even support the country which is actually killing them by the 10s of thousands, yet the very same people celebrate the birthday of that Palestinian prophet every year.

16 hours ago, rocketboy2 said:

and a warlord who murdered thousands and thousands of people, who did not share his views. We won't go into the nasty things he did to little boys or just killed them, if of a certain age.

Islam is so cool.

But it has no place in the uk.

I can't remember reading, about that old bearded zombie going around and do the likes of the things above.

Good day.

You are right, Jesus mainly preached peace and love. According to Jesus, the greatest commandments are to love God completely and to love your neighbor as yourself. This is often referred to as the "royal law," directing every action and relationship.

But please explain, if Christianity is a religion of love, charity and love your neighbor, what does it say about Christians when you keep in mind that they committed the most horrific and biggest genocides in human history?

Think about the witch hunts, the burning of thousands of women and the Inquisition think about what they did to the indigenous people in Canada the US and South America plus Australia.

Too far in the past?

Alright, our wars and conflicts since 2000 have caused millions of deaths in Muslim countries accounting for an estimated 4.5–4.7 million direct and indirect deaths in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya and Syria.

Not to mention the total chaos we left after the end of those wars, with destroyed infrastructure, medical systems and governments.

Now imagine any of those countries would have done that to us.

And some people are still wondering where all those refugees come from.

May you have a good day too, Sir.

Edited June 21Jun 21 by Somjot

55 minutes ago, Somjot said:

This prophet was born in Bethlehem, which makes him a Palestinian

lol. how twisted lol

interesting how you twist muhammads paedophilia. how about your other hero shicklgruber having his underage niece poop on him to the point she had to kill herself?

guess you think muslims invading the west is a good thing.

1 hour ago, Somjot said:

"PDF file", took a while until the penny finally dropped

OK, let me put that into some perspective:

Strong Historical Evidence is supporting a higher age for Aisha and when adjusted for actual birth years, this could place her at approximately 17 or 18 at the time of marriage.

Key evidences being:

1. Traditionally at that time Arab girls-especially among the nobility-began counting their age from the onset of puberty, typically marked by a ceremony called Mu'ay, not from birth.

2. The Age Gap with Her Sister Asma (RA) was 10 years, who was 27 years old at the time of the Hijra making Aisha 17.

3. Historical texts confirm that Aisha (RA) was among the early converts to Islam, in the first few years after revelation (610 CE). If she really was only 9 when the marriage was consummated then her birth year would be 614 which does not add up.

4. After Mohammed`s death Aisha was politically active. She is credited with narrating over 2,000 hadiths covering not only aspects of Muhammad's personal life but also legal, ritual, and theological subjects such as inheritance, pilgrimage, prayer and eschatology. That in addition to her intellectual abilities and knowledge of poetry, medicine, and Islamic jurisprudence which were praised by early scholars does not sound like a traumatized rape victim to me.

Most likely her allegedly extreme young age by the time of her marriage was just a connotation to her virginity and, more than that, religious purity.

Sounds familiar?

Rumor has it that there is a religion claiming that their prophet was born to a virgin mother.

This prophet was born in Bethlehem, which makes him a Palestinian.

What's even weirder is that Western people just do not care about the fate of the Palestinians and even support the country which is actually killing them by the 10s of thousands, yet the very same people celebrate the birthday of that Palestinian prophet every year.

You are right, Jesus mainly preached peace and love. According to Jesus, the greatest commandments are to love God completely and to love your neighbor as yourself. This is often referred to as the "royal law," directing every action and relationship.

But please explain, if Christianity is a religion of love, charity and love your neighbor, what does it say about Christians when you keep in mind that they committed the most horrific and biggest genocides in human history?

Think about the witch hunts, the burning of thousands of women and the Inquisition think about what they did to the indigenous people in Canada the US and South America plus Australia.

Too far in the past?

Alright, our wars and conflicts since 2000 have caused millions of deaths in Muslim countries accounting for an estimated 4.5–4.7 million direct and indirect deaths in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya and Syria.

Not to mention the total chaos we left after the end of those wars, with destroyed infrastructure, medical systems and governments.

Now imagine any of those countries would have done that to us.

And some people are still wondering where all those refugees come from.

May you have a good day too, Sir.

Pompous, erroneous and foolish comment.

The inquisition in Spain largely resulted from the invasion and 700+ year occupation there by the Umayyads and later Muslim groups.

4 hours ago, nauseus said:

Pompous, erroneous and foolish comment.

The inquisition in Spain largely resulted from the invasion and 700+ year occupation there by the Umayyads and later Muslim groups.

That is absolute nonsense. Don´t mistake explanation with justification. That is as if you´d say:

"the mass murder and genocide of the native Americans resulted from their presence on land which the European settlers wished to have for themselves."

Historians emphasize that while the Umayyad and later Muslim presence shaped the timeline of the Spanish Inquisition, its direct cause was the Catholic Monarchs' drive to centralize royal and religious authority.

Established in 1478 by Ferdinand and Isabella, the Inquisition was primarily a state-building tool to enforce religious uniformity among baptized Christians, targeting converts both Jewish and Muslim because both groups had converted to Christianity and the Church investigated them for secretly practicing their former faiths.

Prior to the Inquisition, medieval Spain featured a multiracial and multireligious society where large Muslim, Jewish, and Christian populations interacted peacefully over centuries

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

lol. how twisted lol

interesting how you twist muhammads paedophilia. how about your other hero shicklgruber having his underage niece poop on him to the point she had to kill herself?

guess you think muslims invading the west is a good thing.

@Yagoda , buddy, I´ve been missing you. You and your "entertaining" view of the world.

You got so quiet in that "war in Israel" sub forum.

Are you so desperate defending your opinion about Muslims being the bad guys while Christians and Israelis are the true role models for Philanthropy, Humanitarianism, Altruism, Generosity, Beneficence and Compassion, that you have to go back 1400 years to smear a prophet with false accusations and even bring a dictator into your bill of indictment who had absolutely nothing in common with him?

Muslims invading the west?

Have you been hibernating the last 30 years or so when the West was bringing freedom, peace and democracy to their countries?

Let me give you a quick update:

Major wars and conflicts since 2000 have caused millions of deaths, with post-9/11 US-involved wars alone accounting for an estimated 4.5–4.7 million direct and indirect deaths in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen, Libya, Syria.

Not to mention the total chaos we left after the end of those wars, with destroyed infrastructure, medical systems and governments.

Just to name 2 and the cool names we gave our massacres, sorry, operations there:

Iraq:

Operation Iraqi Freedom (originally called Iraqi liberation until they found out, that the people were actually quite free already)

Operation Inherent Resolve (go find the weapons of mass destruction, we know, they don`t have.)

Operation New Dawn (imagine their faces once they realized that their actions directly led to the dawn (creation) of ISIL)

Afganistan:

Operation Enduring Freedom

Operation Freedom's Sentinel

With all these freedom operations those countries must be freedom havens by now, right?

Now where exactly are Muslims invading the west, as you write?

Seriously, if BMs decide to be islamophobe, that´s entirely their decision and I can respect that but please, at least cut the BS trying to victimize yourself.

Just ask yourself what they did to us and compare that with what we did to them in our lifetime and then tell me again about that Muslim invasion.

Nobody in his right mind would leave his family and home behind to travel Thousands of miles on dangerous paths to live illegally in another country - except his family and his home have been taken from him.

We did that.

35 minutes ago, Somjot said:

You got so quiet in that "war in Israel" sub forum

Gets boring reading the same dribbling jew hatred from the same scared losers and failures

.

Edited June 22Jun 22 by Yagoda

On 6/17/2026 at 11:46 PM, Roadsternut said:

Many people who insist they are not racist because "Islam isn't a race" end up treating Muslims exactly as though they were one. They do not stop to ask what an individual believes, whether they are devout, secular, liberal, conservative, or even Muslim at all; instead, they lump together hundreds of millions of people from dozens of countries, ethnicities and cultures into a single, suspect category.

A Bosnian, an Arab, a Pakistani, a Black African and a white convert can all be viewed through the same lens of prejudice. Being Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Salafist, Wahabist, Deoband, Nation of Islam, Ahmadiyya, Alawite, Druzem non-denominational makes no difference. "Rockboy2"'s contradiction is obvious: he claims to oppose only a religion, but he actually stereotypes, judges and distrusts people on the basis of ancestry, appearance, names and perceived group identity.

If it walks like a duck.........

5 hours ago, Somjot said:

That is absolute nonsense. Don´t mistake explanation with justification. That is as if you´d say:

"the mass murder and genocide of the native Americans resulted from their presence on land which the European settlers wished to have for themselves."

Historians emphasize that while the Umayyad and later Muslim presence shaped the timeline of the Spanish Inquisition, its direct cause was the Catholic Monarchs' drive to centralize royal and religious authority.

Established in 1478 by Ferdinand and Isabella, the Inquisition was primarily a state-building tool to enforce religious uniformity among baptized Christians, targeting converts both Jewish and Muslim because both groups had converted to Christianity and the Church investigated them for secretly practicing their former faiths.

Prior to the Inquisition, medieval Spain featured a multiracial and multireligious society where large Muslim, Jewish, and Christian populations interacted peacefully over centuries

Absolute nonsense is something you spout incessantly.

The Inquisition primarily targeted heretics (false converts), some Jewish but mainly Muslim. The Muslims were only there because of earlier military invasions and battles which all featured mass violence and death. The occupation was never forgotten or forgiven. The Muslims were expelled and the inquisition saw the last of them out.