The UK government has pledged to take action against legal advisers accused of helping migrants submit false asylum claims, following an investigation that uncovered alleged abuse of the system.

Get today's headlines by email

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said lawyers found to be facilitating fraudulent applications would “face the full force of the law”. Her comments came after a report revealed that some migrants were being encouraged to falsely claim they were gay in order to secure asylum in the UK.

Officials at the Home Office have begun investigating individuals highlighted in the report as part of a wider probe into what they say is a growing pattern of fabricated claims based on sexual orientation.

The asylum system allows protection for people who cannot safely return to their home countries due to persecution. In countries such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, same-sex relations are illegal, meaning people who identify as gay can face serious risks.

However, the investigation found that some migrants whose visas were about to expire were allegedly being coached to fabricate stories about their sexuality. According to the findings, advisers charged thousands of pounds to provide prepared narratives and help applicants gather supporting materials such as letters, photographs and medical documentation.

Many of the applicants were said to be individuals whose student, work or tourist visas had expired, rather than migrants arriving through irregular routes such as small boats.

Investigation and regulatory response

Regulators have begun reviewing the allegations.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said it was urgently examining the law firms mentioned in the report. Jonathan Peddie, the SRA’s executive director of investigations, enforcement and litigation, said the regulator would act if lawyers were found to have breached their duty to operate lawfully.

The Immigration Advice Authority also said it was assessing the evidence and would pursue action against anyone providing immigration advice illegally.

Mahmood warned that anyone attempting to defraud the system could have their asylum claims rejected and face removal from the country. She added that individuals exploiting protections intended for people fleeing persecution were acting in a way that was “beyond contempt”.

Political reactions

The issue has prompted responses across the political spectrum.

Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the findings exposed what he described as “the scam at the heart of many asylum claims” and argued that those involved should face prosecution for immigration fraud.

Liberal Democrat immigration spokesman Will Forster called the allegations “abhorrent” and said the government must determine how widespread the problem was.

Labour MP Jo White suggested the Home Office should consider restricting study visas for applicants from Pakistan, similar to a recent decision affecting people from several other countries where officials said visa abuse had been identified.

Meanwhile, the opposition party Reform UK said it would criminalise facilitating false asylum claims if it came to power, proposing penalties of up to two years in prison. Its home affairs spokesman Zia Yusuf also said the party would remove legal aid for asylum applications from people who entered the country illegally or overstayed visas.

Concerns from advocacy groups

LGBT and refugee organisations said fraudulent cases risk undermining the credibility of genuine asylum claims.

Aderonke Apata, founder of the African Rainbow Family charity, said she was “appalled” by the findings, warning that they could make it harder for genuine LGBT asylum seekers to prove their cases.

Campaigner Peter Tatchell said most asylum claims based on sexual orientation were legitimate and subject to strict assessment, though he noted his organisation had received a surge of requests from people in Pakistan seeking recommendation letters.

Imran Hussain of the Refugee Council said it was unacceptable for advisers to exploit vulnerable people for profit, stressing that many LGBT refugees fleeing countries such as Pakistan or Uganda faced imprisonment, violence or abuse.

He added that wrongdoing by advisers should not undermine the credibility of people with genuine protection needs.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 April 2026

View full article

Everyone knows this has been happening for years.

The problem is the judges. Like the idiot who let the guy who raped a woman stay in the UK because he claimed to be gay.

Many examples of ridiculous insulting decisions by the UK judiciary. Leftist activist judges should be jailed if people they release for clearly bogus reasons go on to commit crimes.

Just as starmer should be for releasing the prisoners early to make space for the tweeters, who went on to commit heinous crimes upon release. He has so much blood on his hands.

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Everyone knows this has been happening for years.

The problem is the judges. Like the idiot who let the guy who raped a woman stay in the UK because he claimed to be gay.

Many examples of ridiculous insulting decisions by the UK judiciary. Leftist activist judges should be jailed if people they release for clearly bogus reasons go on to commit crimes.

This is the one that was exposed by the BBC right? The liberal lefty Muslim open immigration asylum loving wokey channel?? Wait, that doesn't add up does it, surely they would have brushed this under the carpet to appease the Muslims as it is too scared of being called racist.

Or perhaps the BBC is just a reasonably neutral news organisation and you only cry foul when they look at people you like and worship?

Any thoughts?

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Just as starmer should be for releasing the prisoners early to make space for the tweeters, who went on to commit heinous crimes upon release. He has so much blood on his hands.

And here goes Mr Ridiculous Hyperbole again! Woohoo!!

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

This is the one that was exposed by the BBC right? The liberal lefty Muslim open immigration asylum loving wokey channel?? Wait, that doesn't add up does it, surely they would have brushed this under the carpet to appease the Muslims as it is too scared of being called racist.

Or perhaps the BBC is just a reasonably neutral news organisation and you only cry foul when they look at people you like and worship?

Any thoughts?

And here goes Mr Ridiculous Hyperbole again! Woohoo!!

If you watched anything other than the msm you'd know this was exposed years ago.

But you were probably calling it a conspiracy theory back then.

Now you believe it and think the BBC exposed it. Even commend them for it 😃

They need people like you. 😅

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

If you watched anything other than the msm you'd know this was exposed years ago.

But you were probably calling it a conspiracy theory back then.

Now you believe it and think the BBC exposed it. Even commend them for it 😃

They need people like you. 😅

Ah right, so they didn't recently do an undercover expose of a network of immigration advisers and law firms helping migrants fabricate asylum claims. Silly me, I thought they did, and I thought they handed their evidence over tot he authorities

Silly liberal lefty Muslim open immigration asylum loving woke media.

13 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Ah right, so they didn't recently do an undercover expose of a network of immigration advisers and law firms helping migrants fabricate asylum claims. Silly me, I thought they did, and I thought they handed their evidence over tot he authorities

Silly liberal lefty Muslim open immigration asylum loving woke media.

A day late and a dollar short. They'll be exposing epstein as a pedophile next. That will absolve them of the Huw Edwards saga.

Only useful idiots would give them credit.

Oh look I found one.