7 hours ago, howlee101 said:

So the unchecked flood of (mostly) muslim immigrants into the UK & other EU countries isn't a threat? The only "threat" from the US is telling the EU to be prepared to defend yourselves....the gravy train is over.

I don't have any problems with either immigrants nor Muslims.

My surgery colleague came from Syria, my dentist, a very good friend, from Gaza.

Actually EU country's population is growing older. They need between 200.000 and 400.000 new citizens per year. That is no threat but a chance.

And if it comes "to defend": Who needs an unreliable, war mongering and threatening ally? Nobody. The golf monarchies learned that at present. Or even Canada, which comes closer now to Nato.

America Good Bye (administration)

5 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Likely would have been better off not bothering - sure maybe "we'd all be speaking German now"
but, looking at what has come to pass, was it worth it?
Better to speak German and remain a white country?

A white country is a racist country. The UK's greatest asset today is its increasing diversity.

3 hours ago, johng said:

No wonder the rubber dinghy migrants and Putin are laughing at the UK.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/07/navy-fleet-out-of-service-maintenance-russia-lord-west/

The Navy’s entire available fleet of nuclear attack submarines is stuck in port, leaving Britain vulnerable to Vladimir Putin’s underwater fleet.

All five of the UK’s Astute-class hunter-killer boats are awaiting maintenance and repairs. A sixth, which was commissioned into the fleet, is not yet ready to deploy.

Naval commanders have said the situation makes the UK look “toothless” in the eyes of Russia, which has ramped up naval activity around British waters by a third in the past year.

archive link

http://archive.today/2026.06.07-135623/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/07/navy-fleet-out-of-service-maintenance-russia-lord-west/

Apart from being consistently attacked by Yookay via the Ukraine proxy, there is zero reason for Russia, Putin etc to have any interest in us.

Yookay is an increasingly indebted country with no natural resources - UNLIKE Russia with all it's oil and gas and rare earths etc.

You could understand why the UK, EU (also heavily indebted with no oil or gas) and US would want to invade Russia (to steal their oil etc ala Iraq, Syria etc) but hard to think up why they'd want to invade Europe.

No need for armed forces, if Russia, USA or even Thais invaded England I'd welcome them.
Can't do much worse than the current Yookay political class so why worry aboout being invaded ?

5 minutes ago, nick supreme said:

A white country is a racist country. The UK's greatest asset today is its increasing diversity.

A brown country is a racist country too then right?
"The UK's greatest asset today is its increasing diversity."
Are you jewish?
Is your real name kier starmer?
WTF are you on about?
Please explain why

3 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

A brown country is a racist country too then right?
"The UK's greatest asset today is its increasing diversity."
Are you jewish?
Is your real name kier starmer?
WTF are you on about?
Please explain why

A nation with primarily Black or Brown individuals cannot be racist. It is important to study Critical Race Theory more deeply. I recommend exploring the writings of Derrick Bell.

30 minutes ago, nick supreme said:

A nation with primarily Black or Brown individuals cannot be racist. It is important to study Critical Race Theory more deeply. I recommend exploring the writings of Derrick Bell.

What a stupid statment "A nation with primarily Black or Brown individuals cannot be racist."

Any nation, regardless of the racial demographics of its population or leadership, can exhibit racism. Racism is a systemic ideology and a set of prejudices and discriminatory practices that can exist anywhere on Earth, regardless of the skin color of the people involved.

1 hour ago, Tourist2 said:

"The UK's military is plagued by under funding. Guns, tanks and, particularly, naval vessels are poorly maintained and not fully functional. Very sad to see for those of my generation, in my case born in 1941 during WW2, during which my father fought in north Africa and his brother, my uncle, in Burma. Both loyally patriotic, they would be appalled at today's situation."

---

Likely would have been better off not bothering - sure maybe "we'd all be speaking German now"
but, looking at what has come to pass, was it worth it?
Better to speak German and remain a white country?

I certainly think Britain should not have been involved in WW1, and many Brits of all backgrounds did not want an involvement in WW2 beyond being in a fully defensive mode.

44 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

What a stupid statment "A nation with primarily Black or Brown individuals cannot be racist."

Any nation, regardless of the racial demographics of its population or leadership, can exhibit racism. Racism is a systemic ideology and a set of prejudices and discriminatory practices that can exist anywhere on Earth, regardless of the skin color of the people involved.

Ir's just his way of trolling.

21 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

I certainly think Britain should not have been involved in WW1, and many Brits of all backgrounds did not want an involvement in WW2 beyond being in a fully defensive mode.

Thank god for Churchill !!

Following the invasion of Poland and the rapid fall of France, public perception changed. The public realized that Hitler posed a direct, existential threat to Britain. By mid-1940, with Britain standing alone, the desire to only be on the defensive transformed into total national mobilization.

1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

I don't have any problems with either immigrants nor Muslims.

My surgery colleague came from Syria, my dentist, a very good friend, from Gaza.

Actually EU country's population is growing older. They need between 200.000 and 400.000 new citizens per year. That is no threat but a chance.

And if it comes "to defend": Who needs an unreliable, war mongering and threatening ally? Nobody. The golf monarchies learned that at present. Or even Canada, which comes closer now to Nato.

America Good Bye (administration)

To each his own. When all school age children are forced to adhere to the quran, when all the women must be dressed head to toe, when a foreign power are at your doorsteps ready to invade....remember you condoned it.

And what do you expect Canada to do for the EU? Apologize to your invaders? Good luck with that snowflake.

37 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

I certainly think Britain should not have been involved in WW1, and many Brits of all backgrounds did not want an involvement in WW2 beyond being in a fully defensive mode.

It was called "self preservation". The UK would have been surrounded and isolated by German forces. Appeasement didn't work so well for the Brits.

Currently, appeasement is what is happening with the open borders. As a US tax payer, I say good riddance protecting the UK and the EU....learn to pay for the defense of yourselves.

1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

I certainly think Britain should not have been involved in WW1, and many Brits of all backgrounds did not want an involvement in WW2 beyond being in a fully defensive mode.

Every Major War Begins Under False Pretenses & the Central Banks Are Behind It.

Economist Explains.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wi_zQX--wE

32 minutes ago, howlee101 said:

To each his own. When all school age children are forced to adhere to the quran, when all the women must be dressed head to toe, when a foreign power are at your doorsteps ready to invade....remember you condoned it.

And what do you expect Canada to do for the EU? Apologize to your invaders? Good luck with that snowflake.

You need definitely some extra lessons.

Actually you did not answer or comment coherently my post.

Nobody would leave his place/country if you're happy there, got a good job and be granted freedom of speech without any threat by ICE or similar horror groups.

If I would fear for my life and that of my family I would run. Not to US, but a democratic area as EU and UK, the guarantors of Peace and Justice.

If you apply for asylum and granted....why not stay, work, and pay taxes, in order to give back something for granted humanity. And if you can get a proper education (school, university..) and become a nurse, a doctor, or only a factory worker.

I'm sure, HOWLEE, YOU wouldn't do surgeries, or change diapers or clean the streets, do you?

Therefore we (non fascist countries) need immigrants as workforce.

Or people would have to work until 75 . You will be the first to shout Hurrah, won't you ❓

10 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

What a stupid statment "A nation with primarily Black or Brown individuals cannot be racist."

Any nation, regardless of the racial demographics of its population or leadership, can exhibit racism. Racism is a systemic ideology and a set of prejudices and discriminatory practices that can exist anywhere on Earth, regardless of the skin color of the people involved.

Black people can’t be racist

https://www.pambazuka.org/black-people-can%E2%80%99t-be-racist

On discrimination based on one’s colour, I can only concur that blacks can be prejudicial towards whites - but not racist. What do I mean? Before I attempt to give an explanation of my argument, I first have to define words that serve as the premises: prejudice and racism. Prejudice refers to a positive or negative evaluation of another person based on their perceived group membership. Racism on the other hand refers to social actions, practices or beliefs or political systems that consider different races to be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other. Furthermore, racism is socio-economic, with systemic structures which promote one race’s powers over another. Socio-economic being the operative word, I am certain you will agree that black people do not have the resources to impose such oppressive structures which enforce their superiority. White people on the other hand have, and had imposed them on blacks for over four centuries of slavery and colonialism. Black people can be prejudiced, but not racist.

3 hours ago, nick supreme said:

Black people can’t be racist

https://www.pambazuka.org/black-people-can%E2%80%99t-be-racist

On discrimination based on one’s colour, I can only concur that blacks can be prejudicial towards whites - but not racist. What do I mean? Before I attempt to give an explanation of my argument, I first have to define words that serve as the premises: prejudice and racism. Prejudice refers to a positive or negative evaluation of another person based on their perceived group membership. Racism on the other hand refers to social actions, practices or beliefs or political systems that consider different races to be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other. Furthermore, racism is socio-economic, with systemic structures which promote one race’s powers over another. Socio-economic being the operative word, I am certain you will agree that black people do not have the resources to impose such oppressive structures which enforce their superiority. White people on the other hand have, and had imposed them on blacks for over four centuries of slavery and colonialism. Black people can be prejudiced, but not racist.

This is a subject of ongoing debate, largely because the answer depends on how you define the word "racism"

Sociologists and scholars often separate the concept of interpersonal prejudice from systemic racism

• Interpersonal Racism and Prejudice: The standard dictionary definition is prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior. Under this definition, any individual—regardless of skin color or racial background—is capable of holding racial bias or acting with racial prejudice.

• Systemic or Institutional Racism: Many academics and sociologists argue that racism is defined by power dynamics, defining it as "prejudice plus power". From this sociological perspective, racism relies on historical, cultural, and institutional systems of advantage. Those who argue that Black people cannot be racist assert that Black individuals and communities typically lack the societal, institutional, and economic power to enforce widespread racial oppression against a dominant group.

• Nations and Majorities: Similarly, countries with primarily Black or Brown populations are not immune to racial conflict. They can and do experience tribalism, xenophobia, colorism, and discrimination against minority groups within their borders, though whether these dynamics reflect the exact same racial hierarchies seen in Western, White-majority nations remains a topic of theoretical debate.

The statement "Black people can’t be racist" Incorrect in my opinion example tribal wars in Africa due to racial hatred,

On 6/7/2026 at 12:45 PM, FlorC said:

Nigel Farage is compromised.

Only Restore Britain has some hope.

Some say Restore aim to divide the vote, drawing votes away from Reform. If elected, Rupert Lowe will join with the Conservatives.

Who do you trust Farage or Lowe? For sure Starmer has to go!

2 hours ago, DaRoadrunner said:

Some say Restore aim to divide the vote, drawing votes away from Reform. If elected, Rupert Lowe will join with the Conservatives.

Who do you trust Farage or Lowe? For sure Starmer has to go!

None , the system is corrupt beyond repair.

Have to agree with some posters saying the threat to the UK Is with the open borders rule. We see weekly thousand plus coming over in Rubber boats from country's like Afgahn, Iraq, somalia. These country's have links to Isis, Al quida and other terroists. They are not documented and we do not know where they come from, the only way we are finding out there origins is when there arrested for crimes in the UK. Even MI5 have Acknowledge isis sympathizer's have slipped in and melted into the population. We do not know just how many have entered as the Government has no idea where they are.

30 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Have to agree with some posters saying the threat to the UK Is with the open borders rule. We see weekly thousand plus coming over in Rubber boats from country's like Afgahn, Iraq, somalia. These country's have links to Isis, Al quida and other terroists. They are not documented and we do not know where they come from, the only way we are finding out there origins is when there arrested for crimes in the UK. Even MI5 have Acknowledge isis sympathizer's have slipped in and melted into the population. We do not know just how many have entered as the Government has no idea where they are.

Yet another incident. In Belfast this time.

Immigrant attempted to behead a local in the street. He died of horrendous wounds. Savage video on X which i had the misfortune of seeing a couple of seconds of before quickly scrolling.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/hes-trying-to-cut-his-head-off-attacker-saws-at-victims-neck-in-sickening-belfast-knife-attack/news-story/fa948b6592b06ae2e881b8b1b9b75251

The msm are trying to bury it with the usual "man stabs man" narrative.

Man taken to hospital with serious injuries following sta...

Police attended an incident Kinnaird Avenue following a report made shortly after 22:30 GMT on Monday 8 June.

Just seen it on the news here the usual no details just a knife attack. Looks black and likely an illegal trying to decapitate the victim.

21 hours ago, nick supreme said:

A white country is a racist country. The UK's greatest asset today is its increasing diversity.

In medical research, that it literally true. The National Health Service, for better or worse, is the world's largest unitary healthcare system, larger than anything in the US or China, where you have a bunch of smaller unconnected healthcare systems. That means its got the biggest set of medical records on the planet.

When you need to run clinical trials for new therapies, you need access to patient records in order to recruit the right patients. Some countries put high requirements on clinical data being based on an ethnic mix relevant to their own. China and Japan have requirements for many cancer treatment trials to be conducted on Chinese or Japanese patients, because the patterns of cancer differ so much from typical Western populations. But its really expensive for a Pharma company to run a trial in China or Japan. The UK and Canada actually compete with each other as places to conduct a clinical trial in, because of the nature of their populations which is so well defined in their medical records, combined with excellent CRO support. Both countries will have significant ethnically Chinese and even Japanese populations that can be identified through medical records. While the US might say there are more Chinese or Japanese Americans, because there are a crap load of different healthcare providers, its actually quite challenging to recruit. Kaiser Permanente might be their best shot.

10 hours ago, nick supreme said:

Black people can’t be racist

https://www.pambazuka.org/black-people-can%E2%80%99t-be-racist

On discrimination based on one’s colour, I can only concur that blacks can be prejudicial towards whites - but not racist. What do I mean? Before I attempt to give an explanation of my argument, I first have to define words that serve as the premises: prejudice and racism. Prejudice refers to a positive or negative evaluation of another person based on their perceived group membership. Racism on the other hand refers to social actions, practices or beliefs or political systems that consider different races to be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other. Furthermore, racism is socio-economic, with systemic structures which promote one race’s powers over another. Socio-economic being the operative word, I am certain you will agree that black people do not have the resources to impose such oppressive structures which enforce their superiority. White people on the other hand have, and had imposed them on blacks for over four centuries of slavery and colonialism. Black people can be prejudiced, but not racist.

You need to get out more. Try Africa and then India for a few decdes.

On 6/8/2026 at 10:48 AM, JonnyF said:

Britain's threat comes from within. It floods across our borders every day.

I'm sure Starmer will create some 2 tier conscription system though to ensure white young men risk their lives while minorities stay safely home.

"Positive" discrimination, or something.

Feel free to volunteer.

24 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Feel free to volunteer.

Why would i fight for a government that considers me a second class citizen on the basis of my race and religion?

No thanks.

I'd suggest you volunteer but you need to be British and under retirement age.

41 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Just seen it on the news here the usual no details just a knife attack. Looks black and likely an illegal trying to decapitate the victim.

African immigrant. Yes he tried to decapitate him and did a pretty good job.

They won't mention that obviously. It will be the usual "mentally ill man, 28" and they'll hope it disappears pronto.

20 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

Thank god for Churchill !!

Following the invasion of Poland and the rapid fall of France, public perception changed. The public realized that Hitler posed a direct, existential threat to Britain. By mid-1940, with Britain standing alone, the desire to only be on the defensive transformed into total national mobilization.

You should read 'Churchill and the Jews'
The fat **** and his father were owned by them.

He dragged Britain into a war under the excuse of dEFEnDinG poLanD and ended up handing Poland to the ******** bolsheviks - much worse than the germans.

Churchill even used normal English people as bait to get the US into the war - continually bombing German civilians - forcing Hitler to reply in kind

4 $USD to 1 £English before Churchill tooks England down -
Leaving us BANKRUPT and in debt to the US untill the 2000s + giving away hundreds of patents too.

Do some research instead of spouting B&W history channel BS

Churchill was a proper scumbag and a massive part of the prolems England faces to this day

https://youtu.be/zusUe3sjMbw?t=690

1 hour ago, BarraMarra said:

Have to agree with some posters saying the threat to the UK Is with the open borders rule. We see weekly thousand plus coming over in Rubber boats from country's like Afgahn, Iraq, somalia. These country's have links to Isis, Al quida and other terroists. They are not documented and we do not know where they come from, the only way we are finding out there origins is when there arrested for crimes in the UK. Even MI5 have Acknowledge isis sympathizer's have slipped in and melted into the population. We do not know just how many have entered as the Government has no idea where they are.

It's being done on purpose to facilitate new rules and controls over the local population.
The elietes & their social engineers want control over everything - particulrly people's spending via CBDCs - but can't just do it so need to manufacture public consent =
Encourage chaos and terrorise natives until they cry out "Something must be done"

This new foreign non-white population is also being filtered into Policing - very useful if, in the future, you want to impose rules on native whites (which white police might be hesitant to).

And MI5 are NOT loyal to the Yookay - they work to protect the bankers and the banking system - Same as CIA - they don't give a **** about normal people and why would they?

13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

African immigrant. Yes he tried to decapitate him and did a pretty good job.

They won't mention that obviously. It will be the usual "mentally ill man, 28" and they'll hope it disappears pronto.

Probably rushing a passport so they can call him "mentally ill British man, 28"

20 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

You should read 'Churchill and the Jews'
The fat **** and his father were owned by them.

He dragged Britain into a war under the excuse of dEFEnDinG poLanD and ended up handing Poland to the ******** bolsheviks - much worse than the germans.

Churchill even used normal English people as bait to get the US into the war - continually bombing German civilians - forcing Hitler to reply in kind

4 $USD to 1 £English before Churchill tooks England down -
Leaving us BANKRUPT and in debt to the US untill the 2000s + giving away hundreds of patents too.

Do some research instead of spouting B&W history channel BS

Churchill was a proper scumbag and a massive part of the prolems England faces to this day

https://youtu.be/zusUe3sjMbw?t=690

What utter crap !!

There is Right reaserch and then there is the crap you pertained to say its true !! David Irving, the discredited British historian and Nazi apologist, was this week starting a three-year prison sentence in Vienna for denying the Holocaust and the gas chambers of Auschwitz.

16 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

It's being done on purpose to facilitate new rules and controls over the local population.
The elietes & their social engineers want control over everything - particulrly people's spending via CBDCs - but can't just do it so need to manufacture public consent =
Encourage chaos and terrorise natives until they cry out "Something must be done"

This new foreign non-white population is also being filtered into Policing - very useful if, in the future, you want to impose rules on native whites (which white police might be hesitant to).

And MI5 are NOT loyal to the Yookay - they work to protect the bankers and the banking system - Same as CIA - they don't give a **** about normal people and why would they?

conspiracy theory crap !!