It is absolutely poor and reprehensible to roll out WWII to discredit research about IQ and race that was done in the last 50 years. It is very transparent why you are doing this, purely for ideological prejudice and inability to allow arguments other than your narrow view. You call Richard Lynn a racist, but you omit to give the true circumstances. Richard Lynn described himself as a "scientific racist". Richard Lynn made this statement during an interview with the South African newspaper Mail & Guardian published on October 18, 1996.' The profile article, titled "The scientists who are proud to be racists," centered on academics who openly defended race-based biological hierarchies. In the piece, Lynn provided a conditional definition to explain why he accepted the label: “If we are talking about people who believe there are genetic differences between the races, then I am definitely a scientific racist.” To then try and establish equivalency between Richard Lynn and "atrocities" done in WII, is frankly mendacious and a very lame and transparent attack. It's akin to calling someone who impugns the slaughter of children in Israel an "antisemite". You're trying to silence people like Richard Lynn for the same reason defenders of Israel are trying to silence those who attack the atrocities of the IDF: You want to silence the truth. Thankfully, academics like Richard Lynn and Nathan Cofnas ensure the truth comes out. If it were up to people like you and josephbloggs with your ideological blinkers, people like Arday would still be teaching our children and lies would reign supreme. Lynn, Murray, Jensen, they all told the truth about IQ and race, and this is why, despite best attempts to repress, we have a Cofnas now who has exposed Arday.
Create an account or sign in to comment