Jump to content

How The Eu Offends


TAWP

Recommended Posts

How the EU offends

Election "observers" are a bitter pill for many Thais to swallow. Election monitors are a step too far.

So the European Union is kind enough to tempt us with the offer of the century - sending some 200 poll watchers to keep our democracy from being derailed again. For a lot of people, this supposed kindness is simply too much to swallow.

It is no surprise then that patriotic blood has been boiling after news came of the EU proposing to the government a memorandum of understanding (MoU) which could clear the way for it to "observe" the upcoming general elections slated for Dec 23.

The terms of the MoU have yet to be spelt out, but the EU and the government are already locking horns over two words - observe and monitor. The government has insisted the EU can only observe and it is in no position to negotiate for a monitoring role.

But the underlying question here is not when or how but if the EU poll watchers should be allowed in.

Continued: http://www.bangkokpost.net/topstories/tops...s.php?id=121272

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated yesterday, the EU should put it's own house in order first, before noseying into Thailand's affairs.

Gravy Train, noseyparkers, and nincompoops in Brussels

Regarding elections - the EU's house is well in order.

And given how the referendum was handled, in which opponents were arrested during the run up and their campaign material confiscated, there is a need for outside observers to ensure free and fair elections. We also have a rather strange situation where 35 provinces are still under martial law, and outside of the 3 southern most provinces, there simply is no sufficient reason for upholding martial law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the problem...I think that ALL democratic countries should form a union of election observers and they should observe elections in ALL countries....starting with the US just to show a good example. I think this could be a real benefit for emerging democracies....then they would have a way to keep their elections fair and it would not be seen as some extreme case..it would be business as usual. The result would be fairer elections world wide I guess.

In short, my view is that international election observers should be a part of every national election the world over....it should be business as usual...standard operating procedure.

Chownah

Edited by chownah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still no reason for the EU to poke it's nose in.

If Thailand want to continue to benefit from investment of EU countries, than maybe a more diplomatic and less nationalistic approach would be advisable. It's not that foreign countries have no other choices in the region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If memory serves, the British have invited observers to General Elections for some time now. This is viewed as part and parcel of a modern democracy.

Regards

Sounds like a good idea.

But EU was not invited.

Typical white arrogance.

Edited by adjan jb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikipedia is not and has never been a reliable source.

Which of the following countries is not mainly populated by white people ?

Austria

Belgium

Bulgaria

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Ireland

Italy

Latvia

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malta

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Spain

Slovakia

Slovenia

Sweden

United Kingdom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the problem...I think that ALL democratic countries should form a union of election observers and they should observe elections in ALL countries....starting with the US just to show a good example. I think this could be a real benefit for emerging democracies....then they would have a way to keep their elections fair and it would not be seen as some extreme case..it would be business as usual. The result would be fairer elections world wide I guess.

In short, my view is that international election observers should be a part of every national election the world over....it should be business as usual...standard operating procedure.

Chownah

Excellent point, and such a system being implemented equally, would make it more difficult for manipulative factions in whatever country, to refuse... although of course some countries who believe they have nothing to learn or improve, might still do so. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the response is to call to Nationalism then it begs the question (as has been noted above) what are they hiding - Nationalism, it is famoulsly said, being the last refuge of a scoundral.

However, I can't understand the Farangs here getting so hot under the collor, defending a system and a nation in which they are not citizens and have no rights

Stokholm syndrome perhaps?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was just a check from the EU .No matter if the Thais agreed or not .

To understand what the real intensions are from the Junta.

There are saying this and that , but in the reality work very different .

There are many expatriates in this country , which countries of them have treaties with Thailand.

I think the EU wants to know how late it is over here .

I reckon they know now what we new allready for a long time , TIT and Thai only for T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mid' post='1510709' date='2007-09-01

Wikipedia is not and has never been a reliable source.

Actually, even though it's a wiki, it's mistakes are quickly cleared up. It's pretty well respected these days. I've found it quite reliable for virtually everything I've looked up on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mid' post='1510709' date='2007-09-01

Wikipedia is not and has never been a reliable source.

Actually, even though it's a wiki, it's mistakes are quickly cleared up. It's pretty well respected these days. I've found it quite reliable for virtually everything I've looked up on it.

I'm very dubious about Wiki, the write up on Thaksin was either an autobiography, or part of some gooey eyed memoir written by his Mum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikipedia is not and has never been a reliable source.

Which of the following countries is not mainly populated by white people ?

Austria

Belgium

Bulgaria

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Ireland

Italy

Latvia

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malta

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Spain

Slovakia

Slovenia

Sweden

United Kingdom

Yes and which main serving ones are not populated by a mix? If you look at the goverments of France, Britian etc your see there goverments are fairly mixed with a balance according to there countrys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated yesterday, the EU should put it's own house in order first, before noseying into Thailand's affairs.

Gravy Train, noseyparkers, and nincompoops in Brussels

Regarding elections - the EU's house is well in order.

And given how the referendum was handled, in which opponents were arrested during the run up and their campaign material confiscated, there is a need for outside observers to ensure free and fair elections. We also have a rather strange situation where 35 provinces are still under martial law, and outside of the 3 southern most provinces, there simply is no sufficient reason for upholding martial law.

Just curious. Did the EU simply decide unilaterally that this would be right for Thailand and make a direct approach, or were they invited by someone (group) to talk to the government about acting as observers/monitors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to think it was not such a wise move of the EU to offer to be monitors/observers. At least it wasn't wise to make such an offer public. Most everyone knows the pitfalls of elections in Thailand--the problem of vote buying etc.

The press is relatively free and will most likely report any "abnormalities" that occur. Overall, the country has been organizing and holding elections for a very long time and need little assistance.

The main problem is that even if the "abnormalities" are reported, there is little that can be done about it. You really can't get the country to say, OK, we'll do it again.

Plenty of people will be watching and the losers will let us know what was unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the problem...I think that ALL democratic countries should form a union of election observers and they should observe elections in ALL countries....starting with the US just to show a good example. I think this could be a real benefit for emerging democracies....then they would have a way to keep their elections fair and it would not be seen as some extreme case..it would be business as usual. The result would be fairer elections world wide I guess.

In short, my view is that international election observers should be a part of every national election the world over....it should be business as usual...standard operating procedure.

Chownah

Totally agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious. Did the EU simply decide unilaterally that this would be right for Thailand and make a direct approach, or were they invited by someone (group) to talk to the government about acting as observers/monitors?

What do i know - i am not a EU diplomat.

Thailand though has a lot more to lose by offending the EU than the EU by offending Thailand. If the EU is not assured of stability in Thailand, then it will advice its corporations to be careful with investment here.

The only thing i know is that the mood towards Thailand's future stability in foreign embassies is lower than it was in decades, and promotion tours of the present government have seemingly not achieved their aim of assuring the rest of the world of its stability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name=Mid' post='1510709' date='2007-09-01

Wikipedia is not and has never been a reliable source.

Actually, even though it's a wiki, it's mistakes are quickly cleared up. It's pretty well respected these days. I've found it quite reliable for virtually everything I've looked up on it.

I'm very dubious about Wiki, the write up on Thaksin was either an autobiography, or part of some gooey eyed memoir written by his Mum.

Find out for yourself using the Wikiscanner website. This is the one that was featured in several news stories recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...