2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

If someone that wants to own a home, owns a home, why would they need a mortgage?

You are trolling again.

You probably think that a threat to 'block' you is some sort of victory which is why I won't do that.

I've made my position as clear as I can and I have no desire to elaborate upon it.

Don't bother replying with an "Avoiding the question" or any other attempt to rile me. It won't work; I've indulged you enough this time round. I'm done with this exchange. Away with you.

41 minutes ago, RayC said:

You are trolling again.

You probably think that a threat to 'block' you is some sort of victory which is why I won't do that.

I've made my position as clear as I can and I have no desire to elaborate upon it.

Don't bother replying with an "Avoiding the question" or any other attempt to rile me. It won't work; I've indulged you enough this time round. I'm done with this exchange. Away with you.

You have not made your position clear at all, other than to blame Thacher, and now you run away,

I think it's hilarious when people block other people. I don't see it as a victory at all, I just see at as something lazy, closeminded people do when they are unwilling to support their position.

Before you can have a fruitful discussion, you have to have some agreement on what is ideal, you refuse to do that.

I think that ideally, everyone that wants to own a home, owns a home. You disagree. Why?

I also think that ideally everyone that wants to live in a rental, lives in a rental.

I think that ideally, the government should not have to provide housing for anyone.

I know that what is ideal is not possible, but without a target to agree on, discussion is aimless.

Now be gone with you.