Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has told police chiefs to learn lessons from last weekend’s anti-migrant protests in Dover and Portsmouth, and to use “all powers necessary” when dealing with future demonstrations.

In a meeting on Thursday, Mahmood asked for assurances that plans were in place for forces to respond quickly and effectively to far-right groups she said were seeking to intimidate communities.

Unacceptable Disorder in Dover and Portsmouth

On Saturday, masked protesters brought Dover to a standstill, blocking access to a nationally critical road serving the port. The following day in Portsmouth, around 200 people tried to stop migrants being driven away for processing.

The Home Office said the protests involved “unacceptable disorder”. It added that some protesters were dressed in black and wearing balaclavas, creating what Mahmood described as a “fear factor” and an intent to intimidate residents.

Mahmood said the incidents were different from other protests and needed a response shaped by those circumstances.

Face Coverings Ban Under Review

The BBC understands police leaders are now actively considering recently granted powers that would allow them to ban face coverings in specific areas during protests, in response to the behaviour seen in Dover and Portsmouth.

Mahmood also raised concerns about how quickly police could act when demonstrators tried to disrupt the movement of people and block routes used for processing migrants.

A further incident followed shortly after the Dover protest. Men blocked the only road out of Langstone Harbour near Portsmouth after the RNLI brought 120 migrants ashore.

It is not yet clear whether further demonstrations will be held. In some areas of England, local groups linked to the Patriot Platform umbrella have called for more rallies.

Intelligence, Planning and Public Order Powers

The meeting discussed the emergence of Patriot Platform, with ministers believing it aims to intimidate communities. Mahmood told police chiefs they should make better use of intelligence to improve preparedness ahead of this weekend.

Her comments came after Kent Police previously said it had been aware of a possible demonstration in Dover, but had not “fully assessed” the warning before the port road was brought to a standstill.

During the meeting, Mahmood said the government expected police to use their full powers and to take robust action against any criminal offences.

After the talks, Deputy Chief Constable Andy Mariner, the National Police Chiefs Council lead for public order, said forces were continually assessing and preparing for protests and any impact on public safety. He said this includes working with local forces, specialist teams, communities and partners to ensure support is available when needed.

Mariner added that the priority was to keep people safe, maintain public order and support the right to peaceful and lawful protest, while people committing criminal offences could “expect police action”.

New Rules for Blocking Critical Infrastructure

Major changes to protest law introduced over the last three years allow officers to intervene more quickly where demonstrations block critical national infrastructure, including roads used by ports. Officers can also designate an area as a face mask-free zone for the duration of a protest.

Police chiefs said they have launched an “enhanced and co-ordinated” approach to gathering intelligence in the days ahead.

Join the discussion?

11 September 2026

View full article

"The BBC understands police leaders are now actively considering recently granted powers that would allow them to ban face coverings in specific areas during protests, in response to the behaviour seen in Dover and Portsmouth.

Mahmood also raised concerns about how quickly police could act when demonstrators tried to disrupt the movement of people and block routes used for processing migrants."

Surely if there were no 'migrants' economic or otherwise, it would be a moot point?😉

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by Smokey and the Bandit

Indeed, the UK Government have done this to themselves!

Shabana Mahmood....
the attude from government is all in the name.

Of course.

Expect a fascist style crackdown on anyone who protests against the globalist agenda.

Unusually long prison sentences handed out within 7 days. Public shaming. We've seen it all before.

Meanwhile the RNLI provide a taxi service for the illegals invading the country and buses await for a police escort to the 4 star hotels.

Pakistani Muslim Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is more concerned about English Folk 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 protesting about their town being invaded by hundreds of undocumented illegal migrants from France 🇫🇷 than those criminals breaking into England on mega dinghy’s 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧.

39 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Of course.

Expect a fascist style crackdown on anyone who protests against the globalist agenda.

Unusually long prison sentences handed out within 7 days. Public shaming. We've seen it all before.

Meanwhile the RNLI provide a taxi service for the illegals invading the country and buses await for a police escort to the 4 star hotels.

The RNLI are not providing taxi services to anyone.

Get a grip of your grievance, it’s eating you alive.

Edited 1 hour ago1 hr by Chomper Higgot

46 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Of course.

Meanwhile the RNLI provide a taxi service for the illegals invading the country and buses await for a police escort to the 4 star hotels.

Any evidence that arrivals are placed in 4 star hotels, or did you just make it up to suit your agenda? And would you prefer that the RNLI leave those in danger to drown?

43 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Meanwhile the RNLI provide a taxi service for the illegals invading the country and buses await for a police escort to the 4 star hotels.

The RNLI is duty bound by it's charter to go to the aid of anyone in danger or distress at sea. They go when tasked, and do not take into account the ethnicity, intentions or race of those they save. Over the years a number of boats and their crews have been lost putting to sea in appalling conditions.

It is independent of Government funding, relies on volunteers to man it's lifeboats and on voluntary contributions to fund them.

If, as seems to be the intention, it is financially damaged or even driven into asking/accepting government funding, and the control and change of ethos which will inevitably go with that, then comments like this, and others by <deleted> with bigger megaphones than this forum ( yes Farage, that includes you) will have done an utterly shameful thing.

I used to sail a lot in my younger days, and was a member of the RNLI. I never served on their boats but I supported them. I was always proud to fly the RNLI burgees from the crosstrees of any yacht I sailed on.

I don't suppose any of these <deleted> complaining have ever contributed to them.

Edited 58 minutes ago58 min by JAG

Doesn't the French side of the sea have choppy waters ?

How is it they are only in danger when they are in the UK territorial waters ?

50 minutes ago, NE1 said:

Doesn't the French side of the sea have choppy waters ?

How is it they are only in danger when they are in the UK territorial waters ?

Have you considered that, after an unsuitable and overloaded journey across the channel, by the time the craft reaches UK waters it has taken on water and is in greater danger of sinking than when it leaves France? I guess not.