City Slicker
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
Latest posts...
-
60
-
163
The Decline of Free Speech: How the UK Became a Third-Class Nation
Yes but now theyโre Muslims and other Middle East rabble moaning about jews -
18
Rachel Reeves Under Fire: Career Claims Spark Controversy
I wonder if Starmer knew RR lied about her CV? -
126
Calls for a New Election Surge Amidst Labour's Challenges
The problem was most people didn't get off their ass to vote -
54
-
66
Ex-Thai PM Yingluck to face legal proceedings on return home
Do we really have to play this game again? She will face very few inconveniences on her return. Same as her brother. -
82
Driving round on my Harley shouting 'Slava Ukraini' to passers by..
Probably some truth to that but I would be embarrassed to be on a Harley. If you feel it is cool then that is really all that matters. -
334
K bank E-mail with Tax Forms attached ?
I think the US recognizes that not all banks are in the position to defy local privacy laws, so banks were given leeway to segregate their accountholders into those who complied and those who are recalcitrant. I think the balances and transactions of recalcitrant accountholders was to be pooled and reported in the aggregate without identifying individual account holders. This gave the banks a means of complying with FATCA without breaking local privacy laws. Because of this, I doubt that most banks would take the nuclear option of closing an average expat's account, but it's anyone's guess what a Thai bank may do. I also don't know about CRS or have any insight into Thai laws in this area, which I understand were amended in order to facilitate CRS and FATCA compliance by the banks.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now