Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Singha has decided to use the term "light" to describe a 3.5 beer (better known as piss). In USA and Europe "light" means low calorie.

I guess San Miguel has decided to follow the world standard of "light" to mean lower calorie, even though we do not know from the label how many calories are in the beer.

Posted

I am no serious beer drinker, but I always understood that light referred to both the alcohol and calorie count. Ethyl alcohol is just calories and poison, so less of both gives you light beer.

Posted
Singha has decided to use the term "light" to describe a 3.5 beer (better known as piss). In USA and Europe "light" means low calorie.

I guess San Miguel has decided to follow the world standard of "light" to mean lower calorie, even though we do not know from the label how many calories are in the beer.

:D:o:D

Posted

on google, it says LIGHT in san mig refers to calories -- anywhere from 97 calories to 100 to 117.... they say lesser than a can of regular coke.

Posted

It certainly is confusing, as verified by some of the posters above.

San Mig Light is the same alcohol content as normal San Mig (5%), but lower calories. Singha Light is 3.5% alcohol compared to Singha at 5% (down from 6% due to exise duties apparently), and also lower calories (about 100 compared to 160).

In the UK we have always known light beers as low alcohol, but in the states they seem to be low calorie (so they can have an extra burger).

I have done extensive research into this subject matter, and confirm that Sigha Light is piss.

Posted (edited)

How insulting, using piss in the same sentence as light, meaning, quality of beer.

The average drinkers piss would be a far higher acoholic content and calorific content than lite beer.

Americans and Australians would be the biggest drinkers of lite brews.

REAL MEN, drink REAL BEER

Edited by Zpete
Posted
Singha has decided to use the term "light" to describe a 3.5 beer (better known as piss). In USA and Europe "light" means low calorie.

I guess San Miguel has decided to follow the world standard of "light" to mean lower calorie, even though we do not know from the label how many calories are in the beer.

Singha Light has been around since 1992 to my knowledge and it was p1ss then, has there been a change or something I have missed?

There quite possibly has been a change. As soon as I see the word "Light", more likely spelt "Lite", on the same label as "Beer" the data is instantly ignored by the brain and I move on.

Unfortunately AFAIK beer is fattening :D so if you want to shed the Lbs (kg for the metricos) you have to cut down on the amber nectar :o .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...