.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
Can I Set Up A Pcl (thai Company) Solo?
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
145
Drunken Foreign Couple Causes Chaos at Pattaya Hotel, Woman Detained After Fleeing
Stupidity and a feeling of entitlement to do anything they please because they are on vacation -
1
Thai Telecom Giant Rejects Claims of Supplying SIMs to Call Scams
Of course they didn't sell them, they fell off the back of a truck and the scammers just happened to be there at the right time. -
94
Is It Better to Date a “6” Than a “10” in Thailand?
Solicited or unsolicited it doesn't matter. The result will be the same. You ask somebody if your girlfriend is pretty they will say yes. You meet some friends with your girlfriend and they want to compliment you on your choice of a partner so they will tell you that she's pretty. It's all the same. It might be sincere or it might not. But nobody's ever going to tell you that your girlfriend is ugly, even if she is. -
0
Biden Prepares to Exit White House Quietly as Trump Dominates the Spotlight
As President Joe Biden readies to leave the White House, his departure is marked by an understated approach. Meanwhile, Democrats are eager to move forward after a challenging year punctuated by another loss to President-elect Donald Trump, who has dominated public and media attention even before officially taking office for a second term. In the weeks since the election, Biden has focused on a mix of international and domestic priorities. He embarked on significant foreign trips, including efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza, increased assistance to Ukraine, and participated in holiday events around Washington. Additionally, Biden made headlines with a controversial move: just days before Christmas, he commuted the sentences of 37 individuals on federal death row. Biden also pardoned his son, a decision that drew considerable attention, while continuing to deliver speeches on various topics. Yet, despite these actions, his presence has been overshadowed by Trump’s high-profile announcements and activities. Trump has filled the media landscape with a flurry of announcements regarding his second-term Cabinet, a network television interview, and his first press conference post-election at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Simultaneously, Trump and his allies played a prominent role in contentious year-end government funding negotiations—a process from which Biden and the White House remained largely absent. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) instead emerged as the leading Democratic voice in the discussions. Critics, particularly Republicans, have pointed to Biden’s low visibility as a continuation of his presidency’s broader communication challenges. GOP strategist Doug Heye remarked, “He’s been disappeared for a long time. We saw him go to Africa, didn’t take any questions that anybody could see, and was largely shielded from the press. We know he’s going to go to Italy, presumably, media will have the same amount of access.” Democrats, for their part, have shown limited enthusiasm for defending Biden in his final days. Many express frustration and a sense of resignation over how his presidency is concluding. “There’s just such a great level of sort of disappointment on the way this presidency is ending. It’s almost like a resignation at this point,” said a Democratic lobbyist. “Among Democrats, nobody’s looking forward to Donald Trump being president, but everybody’s ready for the Biden presidency to be done.” As the transition unfolds, the contrast between the outgoing president’s subdued exit and the incoming president’s assertive reentry highlights the divergent paths their leadership styles have taken. Biden, while continuing his work until the end, is fading quietly from the forefront as the nation prepares for a new chapter under Trump’s renewed leadership. Based on a report by the Hill 2024-12-27 -
0
Baltic Sea Power Cable Outage Sparks Sabotage Concerns Amid Regional Tensions
An undersea power cable connecting Finland and Estonia, the 658-megawatt (MW) Estlink 2, experienced a sudden outage on Christmas Day, prompting authorities to investigate the possibility of sabotage. The incident adds to a growing series of disruptions involving undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, fueling regional unease. The failure, which began at midday local time, did not result in power outages for citizens in either country. Estonia assured that sufficient spare capacity was available to meet demand, according to public broadcaster ERR. However, the cable remains offline, with only the smaller 358 MW Estlink 1 interconnector currently operational, said Finnish grid operator Fingrid. Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo acknowledged the incident, stating that authorities are examining the circumstances. "The police, in cooperation with the Border Guard and other authorities, are investigating the chain of events of the incident," Finnish police confirmed in a statement. While technical malfunctions and accidents can occur with subsea equipment, the investigation is also considering whether a foreign vessel might have played a role in the disruption. Authorities have not named any specific ship but remain vigilant due to recent similar incidents in the region. The outage follows a series of high-profile disruptions to critical infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. Last year, the Balticconnector gas pipeline linking Finland and Estonia was damaged, likely by a ship dragging its anchor, according to Finnish police. Around the same time, several telecom cables were also compromised. More recently, Swedish authorities have been probing the damage to two Baltic Sea telecom cables last month. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius remarked that sabotage was a likely cause in that case. These incidents come in the wake of the 2022 Nord Stream gas pipeline explosions, which destroyed sections of the pipelines that once delivered natural gas from Russia to Germany. The underwater explosions were deemed acts of sabotage, prompting criminal investigations. The Baltic Sea region remains on high alert as nations assess the resilience of their critical infrastructure. While the cause of the Estlink 2 outage is still under investigation, it highlights the vulnerability of undersea connections and the geopolitical sensitivities surrounding them. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-12-27 -
0
Gaza Famine Alert Retracted Amid Diplomatic Backlash & Incorrect Data
A famine warning for northern Gaza issued by the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), a USAID-funded initiative, has been withdrawn following criticism from U.S. officials and Israeli authorities. The report, published earlier this week, painted a dire picture of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, citing figures from the United Nations and warning of a "near-total blockade" leading to food insecurity for tens of thousands of Palestinians but replied on flawed data. FEWS NET initially reported that between 65,000 and 75,000 civilians in northern Gaza faced severe risk under the ongoing Israeli siege. The report emphasized the precarious situation of those "unable to or prevented from evacuating" amidst limited humanitarian and commercial food supplies. However, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Jacob Lew, publicly rebuked the report, labeling its data "outdated and inaccurate." In a statement, Lew explained, "We have worked closely with the Government of Israel and the UN to provide greater access to the North Governorate, and it is now apparent that the civilian population in that part of Gaza is in the range of 7,000-15,000, not 65,000-75,000 which is the basis of this report." The Israeli regulatory body for Gaza, COGAT (Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories), provided even lower estimates, stating that the population in the affected area was between 5,000 and 9,000. Meanwhile, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) offered a higher estimate of 10,000 to 15,000 civilians. COGAT also criticized the unnamed report on social media, asserting it "deliberately and inaccurately ignores the extensive humanitarian efforts made by Israel in the northern Gaza Strip" and "creates a false representation for the international community." The agency declined to respond to further inquiries regarding the FEWS NET publication. The swift withdrawal of the report has raised questions about the balance between accurately reporting humanitarian conditions and navigating diplomatic pressures. While FEWS NET has not commented publicly on its decision to remove the report, the retraction underscores the sensitive nature of information dissemination during times of conflict. The initial warning by FEWS NET, though now retracted, highlights the urgent need for clarity and accountability in assessing the situation in northern Gaza. As both Israeli authorities and international organizations debate the severity of the crisis, the lives of those trapped in the besieged area remain at risk, leaving the international community with an ongoing challenge to provide effective and timely aid. Based on a report by NYT | JI 2024-12-27 Related Posts: The Gaza Famine Has Been Cancelled Unmasking the Propaganda Against Israel -
0
Cornwall at a Crossroads: Locals Resist Becoming the Solar Farm Capital of Britain
Cornwall, once known for its rolling fields and historic industries, has found itself at the center of the UK's solar energy expansion. Dubbed the "solar farm capital of Britain," the county is increasingly covered by vast seas of black glass as energy companies capitalize on its sunny climate and proximity to power infrastructure. However, for many residents, this transformation feels less like progress and more like a threat to their way of life. The southwest county reportedly boasts over 27,000 solar panels, more than anywhere else in the UK, with many more planned under Labour’s green energy initiatives spearheaded by Ed Miliband. While these projects align with the country’s push toward renewable energy, they have sparked significant frustration among local communities. Residents and councillors are voicing concerns over the loss of valuable farmland, the lack of economic benefits, and the industrialization of Cornwall's iconic countryside. In St Stephen, a village near St Austell that has roots in the 18th-century clay and mining industries, the proliferation of solar farms has become a contentious issue. Over the past few years, seven solar farms have been established in the parish, and approval has already been granted for another site. Now, French energy giant EDF is seeking permission for a 200-acre solar farm west of the village, a project that could displace a third-generation tenant farmer. Rose Barnecut, whose family has farmed the area for four generations, criticized the proposal. “It started off incrementally, one little solar farm after another, and you accepted it. But then it becomes like dominoes, and suddenly it’s right on your doorstep on ground that should absolutely be protected,” she said. She added, “Farmers are in such a difficult position. They can’t afford to battle against it, and if they don’t get compensation, they’ve lost everything. Everything you see around you is going to be completely destroyed by this sea of black glass for no benefit. For the clay industry at least we had jobs; this will bring no benefits and no jobs.” Environmental concerns have also galvanized opposition. Many locals draw water from boreholes and fear contamination from toxins in solar panels, such as carcinogenic cadmium. Paramedic Mike Bulley, who lives near EDF’s proposed site, expressed unease: “It’s a concern, especially if you have a borehole, and we’re planning to live here for a long time. I asked for information on the cumulative effects, but they had none. That’s a great concern.” Wildlife disruption is another pressing issue. Julie Floyd, a local accountant, lamented, “The area is a haven for wildlife, and if they have to cross that busy main road to face a two-meter-high fence, it completely disrupts the natural way of things. The impact on wildlife is unacceptable. It’s just a crying shame.” Many residents argue that solar farms should be built on industrial brownfield sites rather than productive farmland. Small business owner Mark Blake described the situation as “farcical,” noting, “You can’t grow potatoes on tips, but you can put solar farms there. This should never have even reached the planning stage.” Efforts to resist the spread of solar farms have gained momentum. The Stop Trelion Solar Farm campaign, alongside similar grassroots movements, has pushed back against developments. In August, Cornwall Council rejected a solar farm proposal near Launceston, citing its visual impact and accusing developers of using Cornwall as a “dumping ground” for solar panels. Still, the pressure to expand renewable energy infrastructure continues. Peter Connor, an associate professor in renewable energy policy from the University of Exeter, acknowledged the challenge of balancing green energy ambitions with protecting Cornwall’s heritage. “Cornwall has a good solar resource—it’s sunny here because we’re in the south,” he explained. “But we don’t want the whole county to be covered. We have to be careful to protect the natural beauty of the county.” As Cornwall faces at least 30 additional solar farm proposals, covering potentially 10 square miles of farmland, the debate over its future intensifies. For locals, the stakes are high: preserving their countryside and heritage versus contributing to the country’s renewable energy goals. As councillor Nick Craker put it, “This new era of planning is going to define our countryside for a generation.” Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-12-27- 1
-
-
0
The Unheeded Warnings: How Mass Immigration Is Reshaping Europe
As Europe celebrates another Christmas season, the shadow of tragedy once again looms over traditional festivities. The recent attack at a Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany, carried out by a Saudi-born asylum seeker, is a grim reminder of a recurring pattern. This follows a series of similar incidents, such as the 2016 attack in Berlin by a Tunisian migrant and the horrifying events in Solingen earlier this year, where a Syrian Islamist killed three and injured eight at a "Festival of Diversity." Once-innocent events are now marked by heightened security, with barriers cynically referred to as “diversity bollards.” Despite these events, much of the Western political and media class continues to deny a connection between uncontrolled mass migration and the rise in crimes, including terrorism. They rightly point out that not all migrants are criminals or extremists, but this argument sidesteps the broader societal consequences of large-scale immigration. As I warned in my book *The Strange Death of Europe*, published nearly a decade ago, importing people from around the world inevitably brings the challenges of their regions with them. For centuries, European societies were remarkably culturally and ethnically homogenous. The current wave of mass migration represents a dramatic departure from that history, with profound consequences. While some governments, such as Denmark and more recently Sweden, have begun to tighten migration policies, many others have accelerated the process. The United Kingdom is a prime example, where annual migration figures released last month show that 1.1 million foreign nationals have been added to the population every year since 2021. These figures reveal a stark shift: only 10% of the arrivals are EU nationals, while the majority come from countries like India, Nigeria, Pakistan, China, and Zimbabwe. Contrary to optimistic assumptions, most of these migrants are unlikely to contribute more in taxes than they take in public services, exacerbating pressures on housing, healthcare, and other resources. Beyond economics, the cultural implications are equally concerning. If the migration trend were reversed — say, with 100,000 British citizens moving to Pakistan annually — it would likely be labeled as “colonization.” Yet, in Britain, large-scale migration is celebrated as “diversity,” even as it transforms communities into new forms of homogeneity that are markedly different from their historical character. This trajectory represents a profound betrayal of the public’s trust. The Labour government under Tony Blair initiated policies in 1997 that significantly increased immigration. Subsequent Conservative governments promised to reverse this trend, including a pledge to reduce net migration to pre-Blair levels. The 2016 Brexit vote was driven in large part by a desire to “take back control” of the UK’s borders. Yet, under successive prime ministers — Theresa May, Boris Johnson, and Rishi Sunak — these promises have not been fulfilled. Instead, immigration has surged, fueled by loopholes such as bogus student visas and policies encouraging low-paid workers and their dependents. While EU migration has decreased, non-EU migration has soared, comprising 80% of total arrivals. The consequences of this unchecked migration extend far beyond terrorist acts or rising crime rates. They strike at the heart of national identity and cohesion. If governments fail to deter illegal immigration, address the challenges of integration, and consider repatriation for those who have no legal right to remain, the concept of a unified nation becomes increasingly tenuous. I, along with others, have long warned of these outcomes. Yet the political class has largely ignored these warnings, leaving their electorates disillusioned and their countries fundamentally changed. There is little solace in being proven right when the consequences are so grave, and the necessary actions remain so elusive. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-12-27
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
.thumb.jpeg.a590efe7815f9e9f4370d280598cef47.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now