What? I do not relate to your comment. I do not live in Thailand for starters. I think you've rather missed the point. You've made an rather strong derogatory opinion which implies you feel you are entitled to an opinion (I agree that you have a right to an opinion), yet when scrutinised, you use 'not living in Thailand' as an excuse to avoid explanation of said opinion. You described the man as a "gorilla" and implied his actions were animalistic. My question was simple: if someone pulled your wife's hair, smashed a bottle over your daughter's head, and another man shoved your wife to the ground with a stick, what would you do? That question works whether you're in Thailand, Britain, Norway or the Moon. If you want to avoid answering it, that's your prerogative. But "I don't live in Thailand" isn't really a response, because your original comment wasn't about Thai geography, it was a judgement on someone's actions. So which is it? Are your comments open to discussion, scrutiny, disagreement and questioning, like everyone else's? Or are they somehow exempt or invalid because you don't live in Thailand. You can't really have it both ways.
Create an account or sign in to comment