metisdead Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Discussion over news links is off-topic. If you wish to discredit the source of information, feel free to provide your own source. One post removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
otherstuff1957 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 This is a good example how corrupted that PT govt is over a short period of only 3 months. This is a good reason why PT must not be put in power. NO. This is a good example of how biased and wrong you are. Do you know what a Permanent Secretary is? The gentleman served in the previous Democrat and military junta administrations. He continued in his job because the PTP could not sack everyone or else people like you would have been up in arms screaming about vindictiveness. On the contrary, this is a good example of why the Democrats had to be removed from power, because he was one of their appointees. Yes, an appointee, as his position had to be reconfirmed by the former Abhisit administration. Good work. Don't let the truth interfere with your spreading of falsehoods. Will you be retracting your statement and apologizing? From what I know the man was appointed to that position in 2001. Will you be retracting your statement and apologizing? 2001? If this is true, he was appointed under the first Thaksin administration & continued in office through the Coup, the Junta, The PPP administration, the Democrats & now the PT. So, everyone can spin this one according to their own pet bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EyesWideOpen Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 This is a good example how corrupted that PT govt is over a short period of only 3 months. This is a good reason why PT must not be put in power. NO. This is a good example of how biased and wrong you are. Do you know what a Permanent Secretary is? The gentleman served in the previous Democrat and military junta administrations. He continued in his job because the PTP could not sack everyone or else people like you would have been up in arms screaming about vindictiveness. On the contrary, this is a good example of why the Democrats had to be removed from power, because he was one of their appointees. Yes, an appointee, as his position had to be reconfirmed by the former Abhisit administration. Good work. Don't let the truth interfere with your spreading of falsehoods. Will you be retracting your statement and apologizing? From what I know the man was appointed to that position in 2001. Will you be retracting your statement and apologizing? 2001? If this is true, he was appointed under the first Thaksin administration & continued in office through the Coup, the Junta, The PPP administration, the Democrats & now the PT. So, everyone can spin this one according to their own pet bias. Interesting..... Clearly the position is capable of generating a mountain of corruption money, so you would think that each successive administration would put in their own guy. They did not. So from that I can think of only two conclusions. He knows where a lot of skeletons are buried, so he is untouchable like Chuvit. Or he knows how to properly divide the money to the proper person currently in power, so best to simply leave him there and keeping getting the bags of money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AleG Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Interesting..... Clearly the position is capable of generating a mountain of corruption money, so you would think that each successive administration would put in their own guy. They did not. So from that I can think of only two conclusions. He knows where a lot of skeletons are buried, so he is untouchable like Chuvit. Or he knows how to properly divide the money to the proper person currently in power, so best to simply leave him there and keeping getting the bags of money. Here's a PDF with Supoth's career in the MRTA. So how did it go GK? Good work. Don't let the truth interfere with your spreading of falsehoods.Will you be retracting your statement and apologizing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparebox2 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimay11 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. Never under estimate the potential of a shrill whistle . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elcent Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. Never under estimate the potential of a shrill whistle . I thought whistle blowers are noisy exposing things, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaihome Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. That was the year after he graduated from university with a civil engineering degree Education • 1971 - 1976 : Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering), King Mongkut’s University of Technology, Thonburi There is little doubt this is a setup to get rid of a Newin client in a high position. No doubt as a lesson to others in similar positions. This is similar to tactics used in the early days of the first TRT administration to get TRT loyalist into the upper levels of the civil service. TH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyboy928 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 I'm sure it's all just a big misunderstanding. The original B5 million that Supoth reported missing was, as claimed, his wedding gift and dowry for his daughter. The other B16 million (or thereabouts) was a wedding gift from Potjaman. I'm not quite sure how the secretary, the maid and the chauffeur fit in the picture (on the groom's side?) but I'm sure a (semi-)plausible explanation will be worked out eventually. HA HA, nice .Will be hard to explaine in any country in Europe, but not here . people should start expose all this leaders and high ranking people, look if house and property can match it up with the salery and income , every one with some balls in every place should do this, and give information to News Papers that is not in this people pockets . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyboy928 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 (edited) If Hollywood started doing movies based on some of things in Thailand, they would be completely unbelievable. Yess. and the buisness idea this case will give to many other bandits in this country, when they know all or most of all high ranking people probaly have their houses stacket up with cash to be easy picked up... I bet many is fixing new bank boxes all over the country as we discuss this. Edited November 22, 2011 by tommyboy928 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparebox2 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. That was the year after he graduated from university with a civil engineering degree Education • 1971 - 1976 : Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering), King Mongkut's University of Technology, Thonburi There is little doubt this is a setup to get rid of a Newin client in a high position. No doubt as a lesson to others in similar positions. This is similar to tactics used in the early days of the first TRT administration to get TRT loyalist into the upper levels of the civil service. TH A setup? Who set him up? Thaksin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Yai Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 (edited) From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. That was the year after he graduated from university with a civil engineering degree Education • 1971 - 1976 : Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering), King Mongkut's University of Technology, Thonburi There is little doubt this is a setup to get rid of a Newin client in a high position. No doubt as a lesson to others in similar positions. This is similar to tactics used in the early days of the first TRT administration to get TRT loyalist into the upper levels of the civil service. TH A setup? Who set him up? Thaksin? Thaksin? nah wishful thinking,the guy actually set himself up by having so much loose cash in his house and (2) lieing through his back teeth as to how much had been stolen, my take on this is in the end nothing and I do mean nothing will come of it, why? one may ask, the simple reason is the guy simply knows too much ,and if he is "taken down" you can bet your <deleted> he will sing like a canary about other wrong doers , my opinion on this is the sum alleged to have been stolen from him is just peanuts in comparison to the really "big players" who want to keep their noses well and truly in the "trough" without a guy like this waking the dreamsville electorate up as to just what is really going on in this Country. Edited November 22, 2011 by Colin Yai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EyesWideOpen Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From his CV: 1977 : Security Officer 3, Department of Labour , Ministry of Interior So this guy was just a was a security guard (Ror Bor Por in Thai) in 1977. That was the year after he graduated from university with a civil engineering degree Education • 1971 - 1976 : Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering), King Mongkut's University of Technology, Thonburi There is little doubt this is a setup to get rid of a Newin client in a high position. No doubt as a lesson to others in similar positions. This is similar to tactics used in the early days of the first TRT administration to get TRT loyalist into the upper levels of the civil service. TH A setup? Who set him up? Thaksin? Thaksin? nah wishful thinking,the guy actually set himself up by having so much loose cash in his house and (2) lieing through his back teeth as to how much had been stolen, my take on this is in the end nothing and I do mean nothing will come of it, why? one may ask, the simple reason is the guy simply knows too much ,and if he is "taken down" you can bet your <deleted> he will sing like a canary about other wrong doers , my opinion on this is the sum alleged to have been stolen from him is just peanuts in comparison to the really "big players" who want to keep their noses well and truly in the "trough" without a guy like this waking the dreamsville electorate up as to just what is really going on in this Country. Spot on. Although I suspect that news like this does not really reach the up country folks...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now