webfact Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Chuwit: No Massage Parlor Near Schools The Love Thailand Party leader held a press conference against a famous massage parlor located near a school in Ratchadapisek District. Love Thailand Party leader Chuwit Kamolvisit held a press conference yesterday in front of Trium Udom Suksa Pattanakarn School on Ratchadapisek Road. He fired at the high-ranking police officer who allowed the massage parlor Elina to reopen opposite the school, saying that it's unlawful and school children will be swayed by bad influences. He added that he campaigned against Elina seven years ago, which led to the closure of the parlor. After that Chuwit interviewed students about the massage parlor near their school. In response, the Elina owner, Prasert Sukkhee, also known as Kolak, showed up and rebuked Chuwit. Prasert said back during the days when Chuwit was the former owner of the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. Prasert stated that Chuwit would like to play a high profile in the matter to increase his popularity. In addition, Prasert demanded that if Chuwit sold all of his parlor businesses before becoming an MP, then he must prove that he paid taxes legally. Chuwit did not strike back but left the scene immediately. Prasert insisted that he has struggled for seven years to reopen the parlor. He stated that his business is legal, since it is located more than 150 meters from the school as stipulated by the law. Moreover, he said he may file a charge against Chuwit for tarnishing his reputation, after a discussion with his lawyer. -- Tan Network 2011-12-07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lannarebirth Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Moreover, he said he may file a charge against Chuwit for tarnishing his reputation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orac Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Moreover, he said he may file a charge against Chuwit for tarnishing his reputation Not the Nation would have been proud of this story if they had thought of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparebox2 Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Prasert said back during the days when Chuwit was the former owner of the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. History is hostory. let by gone be bygone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lannarebirth Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Moreover, he said he may file a charge against Chuwit for tarnishing his reputation Not the Nation would have been proud of this story if they had thought of it. Absolutely! That entrance through the wat line was priceless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammered Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Massage tycoons fallout continues. This story seemed to amuse the Thai people who were watching it last night where I was. Although it seems Chuwit's campaigning and brash style are enjoyed, it also seems his reputation and motivations are not viewed nearly so highly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orac Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 He certainly has the right name for a massage parlour operator - Prasert Sukkhee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tragickingdom Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 If someone has no right to speak about massage parlors it is the hypocrite of mister Chuwit. Chuwit himself enslaved hundreds of poor rural girls into the sex trade. So before he ventilates his opinion, he should go to the bank withdraw all of his money, sell all of his property and compensate the 12, 13 , 14 15, and 16 years old who lost their virginity in his sleazy places. Than they should lock him up for ten years and than when he has served his sentence he may speak out again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydebolle Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 I do not know what this is all about. A place where healthy massages are being offered is nothing wrong 8-) Or am I getting all this wrong again? There more they change, the less will change, rest assured 8-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khaowong1 Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Don't you just love this stuff? Only in Thailand. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPI Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 I'm sure the teachers drop in occasionally for a rejuvinating health treatment ! That's what they do there isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Payboy Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 He certainly has the right name for a massage parlour operator - Prasert Sukkhee Okay Sukhee or Chuwit - which one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeanelie Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 ...the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. Total disrespect for a buddhist sacrilege. Disrespect for Thai youth. Close the brothel! Punish the owner for deeply disrespecting society related values such as religion and schooling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbin Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 ...the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. Total disrespect for a buddhist sacrilege. Disrespect for Thai youth. Close the brothel! Punish the owner for deeply disrespecting society related values such as religion and schooling. Aw........let someone else do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulesMad Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 I'm sure the teachers drop in occasionally for a rejuvinating health treatment ! That's what they do there isn't it? Just what I was thinking And imagine what would happen if they find some of the school's students servicing them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel1500 Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 So, how far does he want to make those poor school girls walk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heng Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 By the way, the massage parlour in question is Alaina.... not Elina. Also, even closer too the school in question is the massage parlour called 'The Lord' which is decorated suspiciously in the Chuwit interior decorating 'style.' Although they may argue that it's only the parking lot that is close, and that the actual building is further away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sausageandmash Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Fantastic. The man's a god! He truly understands that this is a country built on sleaze and doesn't pretend otherwise. Prasert said back during the days when Chuwit was the former owner of the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. History is hostory. let by gone be bygone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadiadi Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 What a hippocrit Chuwit is lmao and I have met the guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siripon Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 The Democrats saw through Chuwit from day one when he teamed up with Chalerm to get rid of the police chief,Police- General Wichian, they wisely refused to share information or let him join the censure debate against the government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyberskin Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 ...the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. Total disrespect for a buddhist sacrilege. Disrespect for Thai youth. Close the brothel! Punish the owner for deeply disrespecting society related values such as religion and schooling. Try reading the article again. The massage parlor owner Prasert was asserting that previously when the MP Chuwit owned a massage parlor he had made a request to use a temple gate as another entrance....thereby showing Chuwit as being hypocritical. And just to be accurate, a massage parlor is not a brothel....there's actual massage's that take place.....perhaps even occasionally only massages. It would be interesting to know if the massage parlor (before it had been forced to close) had been there before the school. Either way I suppose it's not a good idea to mix the two, but that's just a farang's point of view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sawadeeken Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 He certainly has the right name for a massage parlour operator - Prasert Sukkhee I was wondering if anyone else could see how fitting his name was for a 'massage parlor' owner. There may be other meanings in Thai for the two words that his last name are made up with, but the meaning that I know for 'suk or sukk' is 'ripe' and often 'overly ripe'. The other part 'hee' (pronounced with the 'ee' as a long and rising tone), many farangs may know what it is if you've been around a few bar-girls, but if you don't know you can ask one. It is considered 'very nasty' and 'rude' so be WARNED. Don't ask just any lady what it is, but if she likes to talk nasty - then you can. After you figure it all out (if you didn't know these meanings) -- you may see the 'humour' in this translation in connection to being a 'massage parlor owner' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhunHay Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Moreover, he said he may file a charge against Chuwit for tarnishing his reputation For that matter, what the different of an reputation that is already belongs to rows of sub zero numeric ? Ngor Jing Jing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze01 Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 ...the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. Total disrespect for a buddhist sacrilege. Disrespect for Thai youth. Close the brothel! Punish the owner for deeply disrespecting society related values such as religion and schooling. Who said anything about a brothel? It's a clean, safe, luxurious massage place, that's all. BTW, in case you haven't noticed, you aren't in Kansas anymore Dorothy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOODLOVER Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 ...the 'Honolulu' massage parlor has asked a permission to use the temple gate as another entrance. Total disrespect for a buddhist sacrilege. Disrespect for Thai youth. Close the brothel! Punish the owner for deeply disrespecting society related values such as religion and schooling. Who said anything about a brothel? It's a clean, safe, luxurious massage place, that's all. BTW, in case you haven't noticed, you aren't in Kansas anymore Dorothy. Both have happy endings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamsom Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 The proof is in the pudding! All readers who have posted should go for a massage at this place, and then decide. I usually go to a place on Sukhumvit Soi 22 which is fantastic and one wears pajamas. I used to work at a school where Chuwit's daughter went, and some teachers walked to Silom for a massage during lunch. Adios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mca Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 I used to work at a school where Chuwit's daughter went, and some teachers walked to Silom for a massage during lunch. I think the possibly the last thing on earth I'd want to do after having my knob polished would be to walk back to school and teach kids all afternoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanlic Posted December 8, 2011 Share Posted December 8, 2011 This certainly has nothing to to do with kids welfare Wonder if all those young kids who walk through Soi Cowboy or que up for a motorcycle taxi on the corner on their way back from school everyday are thinking I must become a bar girl when I grow up. Don't see any signs of the Love Thailand Party saying it must be closed It's not like there's no one around at that time, plenty working girls walking around dressed for work already and nothing could be more open, but a massage palour where things are a lot less obvious becomes high profile news. I'll vote for''' Chuwit is manipalting the media as the guy suggests Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newermonkey Posted December 8, 2011 Share Posted December 8, 2011 (edited) Whats wrong with a massage parlor, I enjoy a good oil massage after a hard weeks work, if you get a skilled person its very therapeutic. Doctors recommend massage as treatment for tired muscles and sometimes trapped nerves. Next they will ban Doctors clinics. I don't understand what this fuss is about, anyone like to explain to me why a massage parlor should not be in fact right next to the school, don't we want to teach good health to all the students? The masseurs could even go into the school to teach their skills to the kids, with live demonstrations with real clients, it would be very educational. Would you not appreciate your young daughter or son coming home from school and practice their new learned skill on you? :jap: Edited December 8, 2011 by newermonkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJohnson Posted December 8, 2011 Share Posted December 8, 2011 If someone has no right to speak about massage parlors it is the hypocrite of mister Chuwit. Chuwit himself enslaved hundreds of poor rural girls into the sex trade. So before he ventilates his opinion, he should go to the bank withdraw all of his money, sell all of his property and compensate the 12, 13 , 14 15, and 16 years old who lost their virginity in his sleazy places. Than they should lock him up for ten years and than when he has served his sentence he may speak out again. Yes, hypocrite indeed. Also ironic that he sends his own daughters to one of the strictest all-girl Christian schools in the country. I think he might be slightly overdrawn at the Karma Bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now