Militants have threatened to plunge Britain into 'disaster' with a wave of terror attacks if hate cleric Abu Qatada is deported to Jordan.

In a statement posted to a militant web forum, Al Qaeda warned Britain that his expulsion would open 'the gates of evil that will harm (Britain) and its subjects.'

SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors online activity from terrorist groups, said that Somalia's al-Qaeda-linked militant group al-Shabab also issued a warning on militant forums Monday.

'The British public is also forewarned that it will be the British government, as a result of its imprudence, that shall be liable for any disaster that befalls them, or their national interests,' the statement said, according to SITE

.

Yesterday it emerged that Qatada could be back on the streets within weeks as the row over botched efforts to deport him continued to rage.

An immigration judge said he would reconsider bail if the fanatic’s removal from Britain was not ‘imminent’.

The ruling was a further blow to embattled Home Secretary Theresa May as she continued to insist there had been no blunder by her officials over Qatada’s case.

Facing down her critics in the Commons, Mrs May accepted she would take ‘full responsibility’ for any mistakes. She said: ‘This is not a question of what officials have done. I take full responsibility.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz1sc6HaEHO

^^^ <deleted>^^^

Edited April 20, 201214 yr by Boater

How dare Al Qaeda presume to tell us what to do, the scumbags! Britain has pussyfooted enough about Abu Qatada.... and should maybe start making a few decisions for a change.

But it's only the Daily Mail!

How many times have al Qaeda or the Taliban threatened mass attacks against western civilian targets for one reason or another? It's just business as usual.

The reason this has taken so long is that the UK allows issues like this to go through due process, including appeals. Something that is alien to Al Qaeda. The pure fact that they are threatening the UK with such acts, prove the type of company he keeps and he should be booted out forthwith.

Just put an ounce of lead in his left ear.

Problem solved. (In so many ways)

The reason this has taken so long is that the UK allows issues like this to go through due process, including appeals. Something that is alien to Al Qaeda. The pure fact that they are threatening the UK with such acts, prove the type of company he keeps and he should be booted out forthwith.

Terrorism and due process make uneasy bedfellows.

I am not sure of the integrity of posting reports from newspapers without OP's opinion to either support or rail, however I do support the freedom to do so.

As for pussy footing, he has been in jail without charge for a number of years, charge or release is the normal route in a civilized society

Being booted out of the UK for the company one keeps, yup that's democratic

Should terrorism 'suspects' not follow the same rules as others going through the court process or should all suspects without clear routes of due process be followed by an ounce of lead.

Certainly solves that problem, but hey don't worry about the rule of law, or when your daughter is picked up on unsubstantiated circumstances, or your son is booted out because he doesn't agree with a local by-law, the disallowance of law will always lead to the fermentation of angst and further unrest which in time will lead to a clarion call to the converted.

Just put an ounce of lead in his left ear.

Problem solved. (In so many ways)

Throw the bum out.

I am not sure of the integrity of posting reports from newspapers without OP's opinion to either support or rail, however I do support the freedom to do so.

As for pussy footing, he has been in jail without charge for a number of years, charge or release is the normal route in a civilized society

Being booted out of the UK for the company one keeps, yup that's democratic

Should terrorism 'suspects' not follow the same rules as others going through the court process or should all suspects without clear routes of due process be followed by an ounce of lead.

Certainly solves that problem, but hey don't worry about the rule of law, or when your daughter is picked up on unsubstantiated circumstances, or your son is booted out because he doesn't agree with a local by-law, the disallowance of law will always lead to the fermentation of angst and further unrest which in time will lead to a clarion call to the converted.

"In jail without charge for a number of years" is pussyfooting. If the company you keep is terrorist in nature, yes, you should be booted out for the company you keep (or shut up in jail without charge, perhaps!). That was true of the IRA, and it's true of Al Qaeda.

I am not sure of the integrity of posting reports from newspapers without OP's opinion to either support or rail, however I do support the freedom to do so.

As for pussy footing, he has been in jail without charge for a number of years, charge or release is the normal route in a civilized society

Being booted out of the UK for the company one keeps, yup that's democratic

Should terrorism 'suspects' not follow the same rules as others going through the court process or should all suspects without clear routes of due process be followed by an ounce of lead.

Certainly solves that problem, but hey don't worry about the rule of law, or when your daughter is picked up on unsubstantiated circumstances, or your son is booted out because he doesn't agree with a local by-law, the disallowance of law will always lead to the fermentation of angst and further unrest which in time will lead to a clarion call to the converted.

Moss, I understand what you are saying and normally I would agree with this view. However, this guy is not British and has no right to be there as he and his family gained entry into the UK using a forged UAE passport after he was already booted out of Kuwait. He claims asylum on religous persecution but Jordan have denied they will do anything.

To me, non of that matters anyway, he could have come, kept his head down like so many do and got on with life but he chose not too. As I say, he isn't british and is costing the taxpayer (you) a fortune. Also, did you know that when he was questioned in 2001, he was in possession of £170,000 cash, including £805 in an envelope labelled "For the Mujahedin in Chechnya". Where does an asylum seeker on benefits get that sort of cash?

He had his chance, so kick him out. I'm in Saudi and if I put a foot wrong, I know I would be on the next flight out. But I wouldn't go crying to the courts of human rights about it.

I am not sure of the integrity of posting reports from newspapers without OP's opinion to either support or rail, however I do support the freedom to do so.

As for pussy footing, he has been in jail without charge for a number of years, charge or release is the normal route in a civilized society

Being booted out of the UK for the company one keeps, yup that's democratic

Should terrorism 'suspects' not follow the same rules as others going through the court process or should all suspects without clear routes of due process be followed by an ounce of lead.

Certainly solves that problem, but hey don't worry about the rule of law, or when your daughter is picked up on unsubstantiated circumstances, or your son is booted out because he doesn't agree with a local by-law, the disallowance of law will always lead to the fermentation of angst and further unrest which in time will lead to a clarion call to the converted.

Moss, I understand what you are saying and normally I would agree with this view. However, this guy is not British and has no right to be there as he and his family gained entry into the UK using a forged UAE passport after he was already booted out of Kuwait. He claims asylum on religous persecution but Jordan have denied they will do anything.

To me, non of that matters anyway, he could have come, kept his head down like so many do and got on with life but he chose not too. As I say, he isn't british and is costing the taxpayer (you) a fortune. Also, did you know that when he was questioned in 2001, he was in possession of £170,000 cash, including £805 in an envelope labelled "For the Mujahedin in Chechnya". Where does an asylum seeker on benefits get that sort of cash?

He had his chance, so kick him out. I'm in Saudi and if I put a foot wrong, I know I would be on the next flight out. But I wouldn't go crying to the courts of human rights about it.

Its not Abu Qatada that worries me...its the many thousands of others living in Britain illegally. Border controls are a joke. As are these asylum policies.

I realise asylum is a difficult issue and the UK has been relaxed on this for a long time but the system we have now is routinely abused at massive cost to the taxpayer.

We need to find a way of rooting out the economic spongers and separating them early on from those in genuine need.

I am not sure of the integrity of posting reports from newspapers without OP's opinion to either support or rail, however I do support the freedom to do so.

As for pussy footing, he has been in jail without charge for a number of years, charge or release is the normal route in a civilized society

Being booted out of the UK for the company one keeps, yup that's democratic

Should terrorism 'suspects' not follow the same rules as others going through the court process or should all suspects without clear routes of due process be followed by an ounce of lead.

Certainly solves that problem, but hey don't worry about the rule of law, or when your daughter is picked up on unsubstantiated circumstances, or your son is booted out because he doesn't agree with a local by-law, the disallowance of law will always lead to the fermentation of angst and further unrest which in time will lead to a clarion call to the converted.

Moss, I understand what you are saying and normally I would agree with this view. However, this guy is not British and has no right to be there as he and his family gained entry into the UK using a forged UAE passport after he was already booted out of Kuwait. He claims asylum on religous persecution but Jordan have denied they will do anything.

To me, non of that matters anyway, he could have come, kept his head down like so many do and got on with life but he chose not too. As I say, he isn't british and is costing the taxpayer (you) a fortune. Also, did you know that when he was questioned in 2001, he was in possession of £170,000 cash, including £805 in an envelope labelled "For the Mujahedin in Chechnya". Where does an asylum seeker on benefits get that sort of cash?

He had his chance, so kick him out. I'm in Saudi and if I put a foot wrong, I know I would be on the next flight out. But I wouldn't go crying to the courts of human rights about it.

Its not Abu Qatada that worries me...its the many thousands of others living in Britain illegally. Border controls are a joke. As are these asylum policies.

I realise asylum is a difficult issue and the UK has been relaxed on this for a long time but the system we have now is routinely abused at massive cost to the taxpayer.

We need to find a way of rooting out the economic spongers and separating them early on from those in genuine need.

Absolutely agree.

These constant threats of escalation and consequences...

Isn't this a holy jihad? Shouldn't they already be doing their utmost?

I would start to question their commitment to this allah guy....

"Opening the gates of evil" is an odd one, too. Aren't Muslims supposed to be the good guys?

Moss, you're not at it again, are you?

"Opening the gates of evil" is an odd one, too. Aren't Muslims supposed to be the good guys?

That actually makes sense. Maybe they should be threatening to close the gates to Heaven?

The reason this has taken so long is that the UK allows issues like this to go through due process, including appeals. Something that is alien to Al Qaeda. The pure fact that they are threatening the UK with such acts, prove the type of company he keeps and he should be booted out forthwith.

Terrorism and due process make uneasy bedfellows.

Perhaps we should only practice one of them

These constant threats of escalation and consequences...

Isn't this a holy jihad? Shouldn't they already be doing their utmost?

I would start to question their commitment to this allah guy....

We're all agreed there's only one God. This is a mundane and - doh, my vocabulary fails me - secular conflict.

If they (the militants) are our friends, then we should take note of their opinions. If they are our enemies, then their expressed opinion is a matter for military intelligence, not political consideration.

SC