DEFAMATION SUIT

Court sentences Sondhi to three months in jail

The Nation

Sondhi

BANGKOK: -- People's Alliance for Democracy leader Sondhi Limthongkul on Wednesday had his guilty verdict for libel confirmed in an appellate review although his jail term cut in half to three months.

In the sentence reduction, the Court of Appeals cited Sondhi's old age and altruism as grounds for leniency, saying he did not seek self-serving gain by defaming legal adviser Noppadon Pattama.

Following the reading of the appellate decision, the defence had sought and received Bt100,000 bail pending the final review by the Supreme Court.

Sondhi made his critical remarks against Noppadon in 2007, portraying the legal adviser as unworthy of a royal scholarship recipient because he worked for former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Noppadon sued for libel, naming Sondhi, other five individuals and two media outlets on the list of defendants.

The lower court handed down its decision in 2009, finding Sondhi guilty of defamation.

It sentenced Sondhi to a jail term of six months. Two media outlets, Thaiday Dot Com and Manager Media Group, were liable to pay Bt20,000 fine each for disseminating libellous remarks.

Sondhi as well as the two media outlets were to publish a summary of the verdict in three national newpapers, Thai Rath, Matichon and Daily News, for seven consecutive days.

-- The Nation 2012-09-19

They really are scraping the barrel now. "Old age and altruism".

You have to give them 10 out of 10 for creativity

By the time the final appeal is heard he will be even older therefore they will reduce the sentence to two weeks with half the time off for good behaviour. Miracle Thailand!

By the time the final appeal is heard he will be even older therefore they will reduce the sentence to two weeks with half the time off for good behaviour. Miracle Thailand!

They will probably end up compensating him for his time in attending and defending his guilty verdict.

old age

Pity that wasn't a factor for Uncle SMS.

The fact Sondhi was probably right means nothing ... Wonder why it has taken 4 years to get it all into play if judgement was 2009.

Joke of a 'system'.

Hasn't he already been sentenced for other crimes as well?

They really are scraping the barrel now. "Old age and altruism".

You're sure they didn't have in mind " Old age and Autism "

Sondhi made his critical remarks against Noppadon in 2007, portraying the legal adviser as unworthy of a royal scholarship recipient because he worked for former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Yet another case where a person is found guilty of libel, for telling the truth! I wonder how they came by this brand of libel and defamation that they use here.....very strange.

Sondhi made his critical remarks against Noppadon in 2007, portraying the legal adviser as unworthy of a royal scholarship recipient because he worked for former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Yet another case where a person is found guilty of libel, for telling the truth! I wonder how they came by this brand of libel and defamation that they use here.....very strange.

I think when Noppadon received his scholarship, Thaksin was just a twinkle in the political eye of Thailand.The insinuation of lack of loyalty because he received a scholarship is actually quite a nasty one in a Thai context.

Irony of ironies, his first "political patron" (according to Wiki) was:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noppadon_Pattama

He was President of Thai Students’ Association in Britain 1988-1989. While in Britain he met Chuan Leekpai, leader of the Democrat Party, who became his political patron.

Returning to Thailand, Noppadon practised law in Bangkok and became Chuan's secretary during his period as Leader of the Opposition in 1995-97

He's a lawyer, whoever pays the bills gets his services I guess, although the whole story has a certain Star Wars," I am your father Luke", feel to it.

Edited September 19, 201213 yr by Thai at Heart

Wonder if Noppadon advised Chuan's brother Raluek when he embezzled millions from that Thai bank and did a runner to Taiwan?

Thai courts, they are well known for letting the elite of the hook. Doctors who beat their wife with a golf-club to death are rehabilitated too, as they are pearls for society and still could be used to lecture others.....

In keeping with a very old and obscure custom that seems to fall into the category of "must never be spoken of" Sondhi and Thaksin should be locked away from view in the same cell and allowed to fight to the death. The loser never spoken of again the victor in a twist on the aforementioned custom would be allowed only to live out his life pushing a Som Tam cart in Khlong Toey.

Sondhi made his critical remarks against Noppadon in 2007, portraying the legal adviser as unworthy of a royal scholarship recipient because he worked for former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Yet another case where a person is found guilty of libel, for telling the truth! I wonder how they came by this brand of libel and defamation that they use here.....very strange.

I think when Noppadon received his scholarship, Thaksin was just a twinkle in the political eye of Thailand.The insinuation of lack of loyalty because he received a scholarship is actually quite a nasty one in a Thai context.

Irony of ironies, his first "political patron" (according to Wiki) was:http://en.wikipedia....oppadon_Pattama

He was President of Thai Students’ Association in Britain 1988-1989. While in Britain he met Chuan Leekpai, leader of the Democrat Party, who became his political patron.

Returning to Thailand, Noppadon practised law in Bangkok and became Chuan's secretary during his period as Leader of the Opposition in 1995-97

He's a lawyer, whoever pays the bills gets his services I guess, although the whole story has a certain Star Wars," I am your father Luke", feel to it.

"He's a lawyer, whoever pays the bills gets his services"

Indeed very true. I have met ladies working in bars in Thailand with the same high ethical standards.

If they was in Europe, no one would had cared !

This is getting crazy !

But good as a business owner in Thailand, does anyone say something bad about me, i can get them locked up very easy !

Whatever happened to the 20 odd years sentence he received a while back for fraud during the 90's. Gave dodgy financial information to secure a loan that his media empire is today based on. Wiped under carpet, old age etc ?

Whatever happened to the 20 odd years sentence he received a while back for fraud during the 90's. Gave dodgy financial information to secure a loan that his media empire is today based on. Wiped under carpet, old age etc ?

He is a model altruism selflessly representing his own interests.

Libel in Thailand should NOT be a criminal offense with jail sentences, period.

It ought to be a civil offense with monetary damages and injunctive relief.

And the truthfulness of a person's comments ought to be a legitimate defense, which it seems not to be here.

What? No suspended sentence?

so is he actually in jail?

Libel in Thailand should NOT be a criminal offense with jail sentences, period.

It ought to be a civil offense with monetary damages and injunctive relief.

And the truthfulness of a person's comments ought to be a legitimate defense, which it seems not to be here.

How is the opinion that sondhi gave a proveable truthful fact?

Edited September 19, 201213 yr by Thai at Heart

They really are scraping the barrel now. "Old age and altruism".

You're sure they didn't have in mind " Old age and Autism "

Libel in Thailand should NOT be a criminal offense with jail sentences, period.

It ought to be a civil offense with monetary damages and injunctive relief.

And the truthfulness of a person's comments ought to be a legitimate defense, which it seems not to be here.

Can't have fines the poor would not be able to pay them if they spoke what they really believed.

how many convictions has sondhi now at this stage?

Next it will be changed to house arrest.

And the truthfulness of a person's comments ought to be a legitimate defense, which it seems not to be here.

The whole house of cards would come tumbling down then; language, culture, history... they might actually have to tell the truth about something.

Sondhi made his critical remarks against Noppadon in 2007, portraying the legal adviser as unworthy of a royal scholarship recipient because he worked for former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Yet another case where a person is found guilty of libel, for telling the truth! I wonder how they came by this brand of libel and defamation that they use here.....very strange.

I think when Noppadon received his scholarship, Thaksin was just a twinkle in the political eye of Thailand.The insinuation of lack of loyalty because he received a scholarship is actually quite a nasty one in a Thai context.

Irony of ironies, his first "political patron" (according to Wiki) was:http://en.wikipedia....oppadon_Pattama

He was President of Thai Students’ Association in Britain 1988-1989. While in Britain he met Chuan Leekpai, leader of the Democrat Party, who became his political patron.

Returning to Thailand, Noppadon practised law in Bangkok and became Chuan's secretary during his period as Leader of the Opposition in 1995-97

He's a lawyer, whoever pays the bills gets his services I guess, although the whole story has a certain Star Wars," I am your father Luke", feel to it.

"He's a lawyer, whoever pays the bills gets his services"

Indeed very true. I have met ladies working in bars in Thailand with the same high ethical standards.

At least you get something from the ladies

Had he Murdered someone the sentence would have been lighter..in the front door and out the back door.

Update:

Sondhi loses libel appeal, but jail term reduced

The Nation

BANGKOK: -- People's Alliance for Democracy leader Sondhi Limthongkul yesterday had his guilty verdict for libel confirmed in an appellate review - although his jail term was cut by half to three months.

In the sentence reduction, the Court of Appeals cited Sondhi's old age and altruism as grounds for leniency, saying he did not seek self-serving gain by defaming legal adviser Noppadon Pattama.

Following the reading of the appellate decision, the defence sought and received Bt100,000 bail pending a final review by the Supreme Court.Sondhi made his critical remarks against Noppadon in 2007, portraying the legal adviser as unworthy of a royal scholarship recipient because he worked for former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Noppadon sued for libel, naming Sondhi, another five individuals and two media outlets on the list of defendants.

The lower court handed down its decision in 2009, finding Sondhi guilty of defamation.

It sentenced Sondhi to a jail term of six months. Two media outlets, Thaiday Dot Com and Manager Media Group, were liable to pay Bt20,000 in fines each for disseminating libelous remarks.

Sondhi, as well as the two media outlets, were to publish a summary of the verdict in three national newpapers, Thai Rath, Matichon and Daily News, for seven consecutive days.

The charges against five individual defendants were dismissed due to reasonable doubt about their involvement in the case.

In the appellate review, the higher court stood by the guilty verdict and cautioned Sondhi for smearing Noppadon instead of relying on legal proceedings to decide if his [Noppadon's] work for Thaksin was unlawful as claimed.

The judicial decision rejected the defence's plea for suspending the jail term, arguing the punishment should serve as a deterrent for a repeat offence.

It decided, however, to grant the sentence reduction. The penalty for publishing a summary of the verdict was cut to three days.

And charges pertaining to the two media outlets were dismissed, including the fines of Bt20,000 each.

-- The Nation 2012-09-20