Jump to content








Ruling Party Mp / Red Shirt Leader Korkaew Released On Bail.


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Ruling party MP / Red Shirt leader Korkaew released on bail.
By English News

13681684719011-640x390x2.jpg


BANGKOK, May 10 - Thailand's Criminal Court on Friday granted bail for Pheu Thai Party MP and Red Shirt activist Korkaew Pikulthong with Bt600, 000 in assets being accepted as collateral.

The court considered Mr Korkaew's bail request on Thursday and explained that he has done no harm to others' reputations while he was earlier released temporarily as a result of his parliamentary immunity.

However, he could not apologise to the Constitution Court judges given that the judges filed defamation charges against him, and to do so may affect the case.

After mulling over the request, the Criminal Court ruled that the defendant's explanation was acceptable and that he had softened his stance, demonstrating repentance for his offence after 37 days in jail.

The Criminal Court then granted Mr Korkaew bail with Bt600, 000 set as collateral.

The court added bail conditions including that as defendant he must avoid any slanderous comments and he renounced his right to speak publicly or making remarks that could damage other people reputation.

The court ordered him to strictly observe its bail conditions.

Mr Korkaew was charged with terrorism and released on bail in connection with 2010 anti-government Red Shirt protests.

His bail was revoked for violation of bail conditions on his remarks that were considered intimidating Constitution Court judges and inciting unrest but he was freed due to having political immunity.

However, his political immunity ended on April 20 as Parliament went int recess. The next session is due in August.

He had earlier appealed twice but the court rejected his bail bids, saying he might repeat his wrongdoing

(MCOTonline news).

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2013-05-10

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"However, he could not apologise to the Constitution Court judges given that the judges filed defamation charges against him, and to do so may affect the case."

Sounds a bit funny, but in a way he's right. Sometimes the law works against you and sometimes for. To some that seems a reason to demand a change of law.

Edited by rubl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect he has been advised that apologizing to the judges is pretty much the same as saying he is guilty.

After all if he wants to plead not guilty ( says he didn't do it) what has he got to apologise for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After a mere taste of jail, he has decided that he doesn't like it. But with a terrorism charge pending, he is looking at a sentence more like 37 years than 37 days. Sleep well, sweet dreams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...