Jump to content

Why Taliban would talk as US withdrawal looms


Recommended Posts

Posted

Why Taliban would talk as U.S. withdrawal looms
By Nic Robertson, CNN

(CNN) -- The United States will have its first formal meeting with the Taliban in Doha, Qatar, on Thursday, a source close to the talks who did not want to be named told CNN.

Meanwhile, the Taliban told reporters in Doha that they want to improve relations with the world. CNN's Senior International Correspondent Nic Robertson explains what's happening and why now.

What are we talking about?

The Taliban will open an office in Qatar and begin talks there with Afghan and U.S. officials to end the fighting in Afghanistan.

Taliban talks announced

Is there a grand bargain to be had?

International representatives close to the process in the past have told me [more...]

Full story: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/18/world/asia/taliban-talks-qa/index.html

-- CNN 2013-06-19

Posted

time to end the war in Afghanistan so lets buy off the Talibanis......we got other fish to fry in Syria then Iran.....got to keep the arms manufacturers profits rolling in

  • Like 2
Posted

hang on have they not just said the killed 4 americans?? Great way to start talks there now..

Posted

This gesture to talk is nothing more than a mirage . The Taliban are very fragmented and highly influenced by Pakistan. Many are loosing their will to continue. No merit in these talks unless the Americans take a very hard nosed stance on what they will consider as acceptable demands but that is doubtful in the light of their past record..

It is indeed time to end this futile and stupid war however, if the US does not take a firm position then there will have been so much blood lost for so little. The history of the US in foreign wars.

Posted

time to end the war in Afghanistan so lets buy off the Talibanis......we got other fish to fry in Syria then Iran.....got to keep the arms manufacturers profits rolling in

Might want to recruit Taliban for terror acts in Syria, that's killing 2 birds with one stone. No, 3, profits, Syria, and they can't do mischief in Afghanistan while absent. Should be easy to win over for the job, just saying 'look, your old mates of Al Queda are already there'.

Posted

Many reports the Taliban leaders based in Quetta and the Haqqani are managed by the Pakistani ISI, even at the operational level. Nothings is going to happen without Pakistani agreement.

Posted

I thought the US govt didn't negotiate with terrorists.

Perhaps the US govt does so when it is getting it's ass handed to them.

  • Like 1
Posted

I thought the US govt didn't negotiate with terrorists.

Perhaps the US govt does so when it is getting it's ass handed to them.

If Pakistan did not provide safe haven, funding, weapons and training for Taliban and Haqqani leaders and fighters they would have been largely wiped out by NATO forces. Adding to this, US domestic political pressure you have a no win situation.

Posted

This "Peace and reconciliation" milestone comes after the US drops the request for a formal rejection of Al Qaida as a precondition of talks. Seeing as the US are arming and backing Al Qaida in Syria the demand must have seemed a bit churlish! I just feel sorry for the overwhelming majority of Afghan citizens who believed that the US were there to help them. Within a year the American people will probably believe that the Taliban are US allies and the US troops were in Afghanistan to fight Karzai and the Afghan army.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...