Registration from committee

[jomtienfun]

At our place VT 2 we had elections for new committee now like 5 months ago

But till today it seems land office had not yet confirmed the registration from the new elected board

Are there in Pattaya maybe other places with same long waiting period from registration from their committee at land office

And what is legal status from those now as acting committee can they do all?

There is no problem with them they do a good job but they postpone things because there not yet fully confirmed by land office and some things should be done

So can they do all or are they limited in there powers?

[Delight]

The Condominium Act does not specify that the committee has to be registered at the land office.

In general terms the Land office act to police the activity of condo .

They are , with respect to the committee, mainly concerned that the rules of rotation are observed.

In terms of general reporting to the land office the Act only specifies that a change of JPM must be reported within 30 days of the meeting.

It ‘s down to the JPM to ensure that the elected committee members are eligible. Not the land office. The AGM minutes will only specify names .plus when they are submitted copies of Chanotes Passports etc. have to be included.

So my advice is just carry on for the greater good of the condo. The land office is interested to see well managed condos.

[jomtienfun]

Thanks for reply

But the jp was not elected at the agm, no candidates for this then he is been appointed by committee and he is also a committee member

Have no idea of his confirmation from registration at land office

jomtienfun

[Delight]

Thanks for reply

But the jp was not elected at the agm, no candidates for this then he is been appointed by committee and he is also a committee member

Have no idea of his confirmation from registration at land office

jomtienfun

Your now referring to a separate issue. A Change of JPM can only occur at a legally convened co -owner meeting ,and the winning vote to replace the existing JPM must be at least 25% of the total building vote.The minutes of this must be with the land office within 30 days of the vote.

Committees can appoint a JPM , but only as a temporary measure. This rule within the Condo Act gets abused.

I think that your condo has a problem achieving the 25%.

[jomtienfun]

Yes we had no candidate for jp only one but then she was to young, 25 years jp must be according the condo act

then the new elected committee appointed one from their members

Before we had same situation the jp was not elected at agm and committee appointed one from their members as jp and he stayed full term till new elections were done recently for new committee

Last elections we had quorum just over 25% so voting could take place but then no candidate

And 4 years ago there was not 25% co-owners attending the meeting

[Delight]

Yes we had no candidate for jp only one but then she was to young, 25 years jp must be according the condo act

then the new elected committee appointed one from their members

Before we had same situation the jp was not elected at agm and committee appointed one from their members as jp and he stayed full term till new elections were done recently for new committee

Last elections we had quorum just over 25% so voting could take place but then no candidate

And 4 years ago there was not 25% co-owners attending the meeting

Your management company should supply the JPM.

The law specifies that the JPM can delegate to one person only i.e. the building manger. That person ,who reports to the JPM ,but is a supplier to the committee and the co -owners at large-runs the day to day stuff. The un delegated duties are the carried out by the JPM. Typically these concern the general legality of the condo.

The JPM has full responsibility for the management of the condo. His /her name is registered with the land office . The JPM has no juristic protection.

Suspect that the name registered at the land office with respect to your condo is a name from the past. A name that most of the co -owners in the condo will now not know..

The opportunity to remedy the affairs was lost at the last AGM.

In spite of all the foregoing -if in your opinion the condo is well managed and information -particularly financial information is transparent -then maybe you should let sleeping dogs lie.

Edited June 23, 2013 by Delight