Iran needed taking down? I think that is a debatable statement to make. There is a case for saying that Iran’s desire for a civilian nuclear capability was previously being very adequately policed by international agencies who had access to their nuclear sites. The Iranians would push the envelope, but the articles I have read indicated that the supervision and monitoring program was effective in stopping enrichment beyond the 2% or so required for civilian use. Fast forward a few years and Iran has enriched uranium to over 60% and has many centrifuges. So suddenly they “need taking down”. So how did we go from an internationally, strictly supervised, civilian nuclear program, to one that is close to weapon grade capability? Iran only needs “taking down” due to a monumental foreign policy error that replaced a diplomatic solution with….nothing. So now the only solution left is to take them down. Sometimes the best fights are the ones you don’t start, or provoke.
Create an account or sign in to comment