Sub-editor Wanted
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
2
Spent 3 hours futilely trying to sign-in/login to VFS-Global but site won't let me?
https://visa.vfsglobal.com/tha/en/gbr/hmpo -
79
British Man Critically Injured in Russian Roulette Incident After Drug & Gas Use in Pattaya
Oh yes, I remember that one when you called it as a pitbull despite the news saying it was a Thai breed dog. This is a prime example of how you consistently twist facts to suit your narrative. You rely on smoke and mirrors - reviving old threads and injecting false information - all in a transparent attempt to score points, much like someone dredging up a broken plate from a dinner party five years ago to win an argument. Right from the start of that discussion, I acknowledged my own bias. I explicitly said: "My very first thoughts... Pit Bull... but that’s clearly due to the bias and media conditioning we’ve all been exposed to over the years." I made it clear that I was speculating, not stating fact. I said I’d wager it was a Pit Bull - but at no point did I assert that it was. That leap was your distortion, not mine. When later reports surfaced that contradicted the original assumption, I highlighted the gap in the initial story - the space it left open for speculation. That’s a valid critique of how the media frames such incidents, not a contradiction of my original point. But this is your pattern: you cherry-pick partial quotes, strip them of context, and present them as definitive statements - all in the service of painting a false narrative. It’s clear your goal isn’t honest discussion but provocation, and your behaviour mirrors that of an adolescent trying to stir the pot for attention. As I’ve already highlighted, you’ve misrepresented the nature of those comments. When posters said things like “Oh, let me guess… he’s a Pit Bull”, those were clearly guesses - not statements of fact. There’s an important difference between speculation and assertion, and you’ve either misunderstood that or chosen to ignore it for the sake of your argument. Throughout the thread, people were speculating based on patterns they’ve observed - not claiming to know the facts. I even acknowledged my own media-influenced bias in my very first comment. The actual breed wasn’t confirmed until later, when new information came to light from a separate news source (linked by you). Your mischaracterisation of those early comments as definitive statements is misleading at best and deliberately manipulative at worst. Setting aside the absurd and irrelevant attempt to shoehorn Trump into yet another unrelated topic… You are, in fact, the one consistently guilty of pushing exaggerations. A clear example is your habit of taking someone’s guess - clearly framed as speculation - and misrepresenting it as a definitive statement. That’s not only dishonest, it’s intellectually lazy. You don’t deal in facts. You rely on incomplete stories, cherry-picked quotes, and half-truths, all carefully twisted to fit whatever narrative suits your agenda at the time... ... And more often than not, that agenda seems to revolve around triggering conflict, pushing emotional buttons, or indulging in a brand of delusional bias that borders on the unhinged. It’s not debate - it’s provocation dressed up in selective memory and bad-faith reasoning. And it makes meaningful discussion almost impossible with you and is why I and many others have you labelled as nothing other than a trolling idiot !!!.. Though the delusion you suffer is also often entertaining - quite a chuckle sometimes ! -
169
How do you deal with connotations and assumptions you're a sex tourist?
No problem, I wasn't judging, just stating a fact. I've referred to myself as a sexpat many times, when single. 70 now, so if single, don't think the gap would be as wide as it used to be. Got here at 45 yrs old, so the gap then was wide, so younger. Don't think I'd be very desirable to the under 30 gals now. Sex addict ... guilty your honor -
83
Gaza Paramedics Shot ‘With Intent to Kill,’ Red Crescent Demands International Probe
You have got that all wrong . Trump with drew funding from Universities that allowed anti semitism . The Unis allowed attacks on Jews , nothing to do with Israelis . It was American Jews who were being attacked by foreign (Iran backed) students -
59
what apps do you recommend for calling overseas from Thailand.
I think you will find that it is not dictated by company policy. It is a case of ensuring the recipient of the call has also signed up to Teams as this is aimed more for the business user than personal. But it is still the case. Seems a real mess to me having had Skype for many years and being so much easier. Just dial a landline number anywhere in the world and you were connected with no problems. 120 minutes a month for £9.67 a year under “grandfather rights”! -
33
Phuket Locals Call for Police Action After Tourists' Brawl on Bangla Road - video
This type of crap happens in many tourist cities around the world, certainly not exclusive to Phuket or Pattaya
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now