Jump to content

Opposition MPs move to expel deputy parliament speaker


webfact

Recommended Posts

Opposition MPs move to expel deputy parliament speaker
By English News

13784462781047.jpg

BANGKOK, Sept 6 – The opposition Democrat Party today sought to strip Deputy Senate Speaker Nikom Wairatpanich of his post for breaching their right to debate in Parliament.

Jurin Laksanavisit, opposition chief whip, said Mr Nikom violated Section 122 of the Constitution for abruptly terminating opposition MPs’ debate on the constitution amendment.

The MPs have the reserved right to debate in the parliamentary forum but Mr Nikom cut short the session, he said.

He led 141 Democrat MPs in submitting a protest letter to Anant Ariyachaipanich, another deputy senate speaker. The Democrat Party also issued an open letter condemning Mr Nikom.

He charged Mr Nikom with speeding up debate on the constitution amendment to have the revised charter implemented before March.

If the amended constitution is enforced before March, current senators can re-run in an election for Upper House members, said Mr Jurin.

In yesterday’s session, a Pheu Thai MP abruptly proposed to call off the parliamentary debate on constitution amendment despite several opposition MPs awaiting their turn to take the floor.

Mr Nikom, who chaired their session, accepted the proposal and called off the meeting, exasperating Democrat MPs, one of whom raised a chair and threw it on the floor.

Mr Jurin said the abrupt closure of yesterday’s session reflected an attempt to silence the opposition. (MCOT online news)

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2013-09-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Senate Speaker indifferent to opposition move to expel him
By English News

13785206848548.png

BANGKOK, Sept 7 – Senate Speaker Nikom Wairatpanich shrugged off an attempt by the opposition Democrat Party to expel him and insisted that he has performed his parliamentary duty without bias.

He was responding to a move by Democrat MPs to unseat him from the senate's top position for abruptly calling off a parliamentary debate on the charter amendment while several MPs were awaiting their turn to take the floor.

Mr Nikom said he had strictly followed the Constitution and Parliament’s regulations when he chaired the joint Lower House and Upper House debate on revision of the Constitution.

A group of 141 Democrat MPs, led by Democrat chief whip Jurin Laksanawisit, submitted a letter to Anant Ariyachaipanich, deputy senate speaker yesterday, charging Mr Nikom with cutting short the debate and preventing opposition MPs to exercise their right – a breach of Section 122 of the Constitution.

Mr Nikom said he had instructed the Parliament's officials to follow the procedure and forward the opposition’s allegation to the Anti-Corruption Commission in 30 days if there were grounds to the charge against him.

Mr Jurin said the abrupt closure of the session without allowing Democrat MPs to take their turn in the debate reflected an attempt to gag the opposition. (MCOT online news)

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2013-09-07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that Khun Nlkom the House Speaker is simply doing his job. Every parliamentary debate needs a schedule and the schedule has to be managed by the parties that wish to contribute and the House Speaker.

If debates are not managed to a schedule they are not productive. If an MP does not understand that he or she will probably experience a coronary at an early age.

So dear friends have a plan for every parliamentary debate. Focus on the issues. Schedule all of your priority issues and front them up in your opposition campaign for the issue at hand.

Now when the speaker calls time! you can walk away smugly knowing that you hammered home your point of view already.

Plan for the future and build a new and stronger Democratic Party with more real members and fewer hangers on.

At a future election where the Dems are in the lead we'll all root for your success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that Khun Nlkom the House Speaker is simply doing his job. Every parliamentary debate needs a schedule and the schedule has to be managed by the parties that wish to contribute and the House Speaker.

If debates are not managed to a schedule they are not productive. If an MP does not understand that he or she will probably experience a coronary at an early age.

So dear friends have a plan for every parliamentary debate. Focus on the issues. Schedule all of your priority issues and front them up in your opposition campaign for the issue at hand.

Now when the speaker calls time! you can walk away smugly knowing that you hammered home your point of view already.

Plan for the future and build a new and stronger Democratic Party with more real members and fewer hangers on.

At a future election where the Dems are in the lead we'll all root for your success.

If you mean he was simply doing what his boss would have wanted then I think you're probably right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""