Au contraire. You invented that the man was drunk. You invented that money was owed (you don’t specify how much, by whom, to whom) You invented that someone was a “trollope “ (victim, girlfriend, unknown stranger. You don’t specify) So what I am saying is that you made up a bunch of stuff that based on current reported facts, are simply not true. All of which makes it fairly hard to comprehend what you are talking about. What don’t you explain further why you think the man was drunk, what money is owed by whom, to whom and who, and why you think a female in the story is a trollope. I’m happy to learn if you point me in the right direction of where your ideas came from. ATM they appear pure fantasy. I’m not interested in insults or some deflection onto some other subject. Just the facts please Sir.
Create an account or sign in to comment