r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 Is what you have posted the actual refusal letter ? Headed "REFUSAL FOR RELATIONSHIP" ? I think many will doubt the validity of this post which contains many errors relating to the use of English . Sorry I do not believe this originated from an ECO based in the British Embassy. NO lol.. sorry this is my wife writing it and sending it to me by email. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theoldgit Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Is what you have posted the actual refusal letter ? Headed "REFUSAL FOR RELATIONSHIP" ? I think many will doubt the validity of this post which contains many errors relating to the use of English . Sorry I do not believe this originated from an ECO based in the British Embassy. He did say that his Thai wife was copying the refusal letter into an email, it was never claimed to be the original letter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 financial requirements your sponser is exempt from meeting the requrements of paragraph e ecp.3.1 as he is in receipt of disability living allowance.in order to meet the requirements of these rules you and your sponser must be abel to maintain and accommodate yoursevlves and any dependents adequately in the uk with out recourse to public funds. your sponser receives 74 each week in dla .he also receives employment support allowance, child tax credit,child benefit and housing benefit however esa ,child tax credit, child benefit and hb are in come related benefits and as such are not premissible for inclusion in any financial year. caculations in these rules he does however receive 1o every 2 week from his childens mother wich is permissible income under these rules, whilst he says this income including all the a bove is 487.83 per week i am unabel to include esa, child tax credit, child benefit and hb in my calculations as the rules hibit this appendix fm se section d 2a 21 this mean that for the purposes of these rules his income level is as per his dla of 74 a week 52 week = 3848 ayear and his maintenance of 10 every 2 week = 260 a year as the other benefits are income related and excluded for any calculations in these rules , this means that with regard to these rules your sponser in come is 4108 a yesr/342 a month .he say s that his ernt and rates are 97.68 a week although it apprars these are piad for by housing benefit and he has 2 chidren of 7 and 4 year old to support .the dwp income suport rate for a couple as his children are british have excluded them in this calculation is 482.95 pm after housing and council tax costs have been paid. your sponser has 342pm before any housing costs whilst i ama ware that you would be alloweed to work in the uk there is no proof that you have any education or qualifications and you speak only very basic english .as such i am not satisfied that your will readily obtain obtain employment in the uk . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 SORRY GUYS JUST TO PUT EVERYTHING ORDER HERE IS THE FULL LETTER REFUSAL FOR RELATIONSHIP you say that you met your soponsor in 2012 when he was in thailand onholiday . you say that you began a relationship with him when hereturned in 2013 when he come to see his father who was in hospitata.you say that you spent 6 weeks togetter in that time andyour husband says he returned afew weeks later in the year and spent afuther 4 weeks here as evidence you have sent 7 photos of you togetherappparently taken on 4 separate occasions. i acknowledge that yourhusband says you have also spent significant time on line getting toknow each other bet the 28 pages of internet chats you have sentcontain littel of any substance and do not appear to show thedevelopment of a relationship to the point of marrage. i acknowledgethat you have you applied for a visa to the uk to see thissopnsor. but you have very littel proof of sort of relationshiptogetter and have not adequaately explained why. haveing spent only 7weeks togetter .you decided to marry. there is no proof of how thisrelationship developed to the point of marriage or of why.having spentonly a short time togetther. you decided to marry so quickly.partcularly as your sponsor has 2 yonung children living with him whoyou have not met . iam minful that your husband has visited thailandand supports this application.but the motvation for this union is notclear .and on balance.given all of the above factors,i amnot satifiedyour relationship with your sponsor is genuine and subsisting or thatyou intend to live togetter permanently in the uk .i therefore refuseyou r aplication under paragraph e cp 1 1 financial requirementsyour sponser is exempt from meeting the requrements of paragraph eecp.3.1 as he is in receipt of disability living allowance.in order tomeet the requirements of these rules you and your sponser must be abelto maintain and accommodate yoursevlves and any dependents adequatelyin the uk with out recourse to public funds. your sponser receives 74each week in dla .he also receives employment support allowance, childtax credit,child benefit and housing benefit however esa ,child taxcredit, child benefit and hb are in come related benefits and as suchare not premissible for inclusion in any financial year. caculations in these rules he does however receive 1o every 2 weekfrom his childens mother wich is permissible income under these rules,whilst he says this income including all the a bove is 487.83 per weeki am unabel to include esa, child tax credit, child benefit and hb inmy calculations as the rules hibit this appendix fm se section d 2a 21 this mean thatfor the purposes of these rules his income level is as per his dla of74 a week 52 week = 3848 ayear and his maintenance of 10 every 2 week= 260 a year as the other benefits are income related and excluded forany calculations in these rules , this means that with regard to theserules your sponser in come is 4108 a yesr/342 a month .he say s thathis ernt and rates are 97.68 a week although it apprars these are piadfor by housing benefit and he has 2 chidren of 7 and 4 year old tosupport .the dwp income suport rate for a couple as his children arebritish have excluded them in this calculation is 482.95 pm afterhousing and council tax costs have been paid. your sponser has 342pmbefore any housing costs whilst i ama ware that you would be alloweedto work in the uk there is no proof that you have any education orqualifications and you speak only very basic english .as such i am notsatisfied that your will readily obtain obtain employment in the uk . THIS IS NOT CORRECT AS CLEARLY IN MY SPONSER LETTER IT WAS SAID AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY FLIGHTS ETC THAT IN APRIL I WENT OUT FOR 6 WEEKS AND RETURNED TO THE UK FOR 3 WEEKS THEN I RETURN TO THAILAND 4 WEEKS IN JUNE AND AGAIN I WAS OUT NEARLY 3 WEEKS FEB.. ALL TICKETS BOARDING CARDS WHERE PROVIDED ALSO I AM NOT CONVINCED THAT WHAT THE ECO IS SAYING IS CORRECT ABOUT ME NOT BEING ABLE TO USE MY ESA AND OTHER BENEFITS AS ADEQUATE MANTAINANCE. I WOULD GREATFULLY APPRICIATE ALL FEEDBACK AND THANKYOU FOR YOU HELP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Inflammatory posts and replies removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 SORRY GUYS JUST TO PUT EVERYTHING ORDER HERE IS THE FULL LETTER REFUSAL FOR RELATIONSHIP you say that you met your soponsor in 2012 when he was in thailand on holiday . you say that you began a relationship with him when he returned in 2013 when he come to see his father who was in hospitata.you say that you spent 6 weeks togetter in that time and your husband says he returned afew weeks later in the year and spent a futher 4 weeks here as evidence you have sent 7 photos of you together appparently taken on 4 separate occasions. i acknowledge that your husband says you have also spent significant time on line getting to know each other bet the 28 pages of internet chats you have sent contain littel of any substance and do not appear to show the development of a relationship to the point of marrage. i acknowledge that you have you applied for a visa to the uk to see this sopnsor. but you have very littel proof of sort of relationship togetter and have not adequaately explained why. haveing spent only 7 weeks togetter .you decided to marry. there is no proof of how this relationship developed to the point of marriage or of why.having spent only a short time togetther. you decided to marry so quickly. partcularly as your sponsor has 2 yonung children living with him who you have not met . iam minful that your husband has visited thailand and supports this application.but the motvation for this union is not clear .and on balance.given all of the above factors,i amnot satified your relationship with your sponsor is genuine and subsisting or that you intend to live togetter permanently in the uk .i therefore refuse you r aplication under paragraph e cp 1 1 financial requirements your sponser is exempt from meeting the requrements of paragraph e ecp.3.1 as he is in receipt of disability living allowance.in order to meet the requirements of these rules you and your sponser must be abel to maintain and accommodate yoursevlves and any dependents adequately in the uk with out recourse to public funds. your sponser receives 74 each week in dla .he also receives employment support allowance, child tax credit,child benefit and housing benefit however esa ,child tax credit, child benefit and hb are in come related benefits and as such are not premissible for inclusion in any financial year. caculations in these rules he does however receive 1o every 2 week from his childens mother wich is permissible income under these rules, whilst he says this income including all the a bove is 487.83 per week i am unabel to include esa, child tax credit, child benefit and hb in my calculations as the rules hibit this appendix fm se section d 2a 21 this mean that for the purposes of these rules his income level is as per his dla of 74 a week 52 week = 3848 ayear and his maintenance of 10 every 2 week = 260 a year as the other benefits are income related and excluded for any calculations in these rules , this means that with regard to these rules your sponser in come is 4108 a yesr/342 a month .he say s that his ernt and rates are 97.68 a week although it apprars these are piad for by housing benefit and he has 2 chidren of 7 and 4 year old to support .the dwp income suport rate for a couple as his children are british have excluded them in this calculation is 482.95 pm after housing and council tax costs have been paid. your sponser has 342pm before any housing costs whilst i ama ware that you would be alloweed to work in the uk there is no proof that you have any education or qualifications and you speak only very basic english .as such i am not satisfied that your will readily obtain obtain employment in the uk . THIS IS NOT CORRECT AS CLEARLY IN MY SPONSER LETTER IT WAS SAID AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY FLIGHTS ETC THAT IN APRIL I WENT OUT FOR 6 WEEKS AND RETURNED TO THE UK FOR 3 WEEKS THEN I RETURN TO THAILAND 4 WEEKS IN JUNE AND AGAIN I WAS OUT NEARLY 3 WEEKS FEB.. ALL TICKETS BOARDING CARDS WHERE PROVIDED ALSO I AM NOT CONVINCED THAT WHAT THE ECO IS SAYING IS CORRECT ABOUT ME NOT BEING ABLE TO USE MY ESA AND OTHER BENEFITS AS ADEQUATE MANTAINANCE. I WOULD GREATFULLY APPRICIATE ALL FEEDBACK AND THANKYOU FOR YOU HELP. Chapter 8, Section FM 1.7A – Family – Maintenance at paragraph 5.1(a). IT SAYS EVERYTHING I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG THAT ALL BENEFITS CAN BE USED.. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY KNOWLEDGE AS TO WHY THE ECO WOULD SAY IT DOES NOT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertthebruce Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotrod4098 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? benefits would stop if out side the uk except child benefit..so not a option i would think.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? Yes indeed it would but having two small children whos education comes first doesnt make this an option, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertthebruce Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? Yes indeed it would but having two small children whos education comes first doesnt make this an option, thanks. There is some excellent private schools over here in Thailand.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? Yes indeed it would but having two small children whos education comes first doesnt make this an option, thanks. There is some excellent private schools over here in Thailand.... Unfortunately not within 100 miles of my wives home town and im 100% positive they are not in the same class as those in the North of Ireland. Their education is of utmost importance and i cant take a chance with something like this. but thanks for ur reply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJIC Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I am aware of what you posted, but the actual wording of the refusal notice can aid greatly in advising you of the way forward. Can't she email a copy to you? thank you for your reply. Im not sure of the actual wording only the basic reasons i have said. i think it would take her a week to type it down and send it to me. I only know That they have said i cannot use my esa and other benefits towards adequate maintainence. That she wont find work due to her basic english. she passed the test and her english is really good although following instructions is a problem. however she passed. really i would like to know if they are wrong that i cannot use my benefits for adequate maintaince and if i want to ask for an immediate review to the entry clearence officer where do i send this to mayn thanks f "i think it would take her a week to type it down and send it to me." She could always get the local IT Shop to Scan it in and Email it to you as an attachment,at a guess they must charge all of 50 baht! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 I am aware of what you posted, but the actual wording of the refusal notice can aid greatly in advising you of the way forward. Can't she email a copy to you? thank you for your reply. Im not sure of the actual wording only the basic reasons i have said. i think it would take her a week to type it down and send it to me. I only know That they have said i cannot use my esa and other benefits towards adequate maintainence. That she wont find work due to her basic english. she passed the test and her english is really good although following instructions is a problem. however she passed. really i would like to know if they are wrong that i cannot use my benefits for adequate maintaince and if i want to ask for an immediate review to the entry clearence officer where do i send this to mayn thanks f "i think it would take her a week to type it down and send it to me." She could always get the local IT Shop to Scan it in and Email it to you as an attachment,at a guess they must charge all of 50 baht! Hi yes i posted her email already on this thread. so all information from the letter is here now. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJIC Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I am aware of what you posted, but the actual wording of the refusal notice can aid greatly in advising you of the way forward. Can't she email a copy to you? thank you for your reply. Im not sure of the actual wording only the basic reasons i have said. i think it would take her a week to type it down and send it to me. I only know That they have said i cannot use my esa and other benefits towards adequate maintainence. That she wont find work due to her basic english. she passed the test and her english is really good although following instructions is a problem. however she passed. really i would like to know if they are wrong that i cannot use my benefits for adequate maintaince and if i want to ask for an immediate review to the entry clearence officer where do i send this to mayn thanks f "i think it would take her a week to type it down and send it to me." She could always get the local IT Shop to Scan it in and Email it to you as an attachment,at a guess they must charge all of 50 baht! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 TAKEN FROM THE UKBA WEBSITE Chapter 8, Section FM 1.7A – Family – Maintenance at paragraph 5.1(a). 5.1 Assessing the adequacy of the funds available In calculating whether the applicant can be adequately maintained, the decision maker should follow the following steps: (a) Establish the sponsor’s and/or applicant’s (if they are in the UK with permission to work) current net income. The net income should be established and if the income varies, an average should be calculated. Income from benefits can be included as income. ( Establish the sponsor’s current housing costs from the evidence provided. © Deduct the housing costs from the net income. (d) Calculate how much the sponsor and his family would receive if they were on Income Support. March 2013 CH8 SECT FM 1.7A – FAMILY MEMBERS - MAINTENANCE (e) Compare the sponsor’s net income after deduction of housing costs with the equivalent Income Support rate. Details on current benefit and tax rates (means and non-means t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJIC Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? benefits would stop if out side the uk except child benefit..so not a option i would think.. The child and you has to be resident in the UK for you to claim. Which incidently applies to most benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhodie Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I may be wrong here, and I am not sure what e cp 1 1 says, but I do not see anything in the letter that refers to your ability to support your wife. It just seems to have been refused on the grounds that you have not been in a relationship long enough to know each other properly for marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 I hear your concern, why not YOU move to ''Thailand'', if you love her, that not solve the problem ???? benefits would stop if out side the uk except child benefit..so not a option i would think.. The child and you has to be resident in the UK for you to claim. Which incidently applies to most benefits. Hi yes i reside in the uk and my children are british citizens who reside with me. they are from a prior relationship here in the uk, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 (edited) I may be wrong here, and I am not sure what e cp 1 1 says, but I do not see anything in the letter that refers to your ability to support your wife. It just seems to have been refused on the grounds that you have not been in a relationship long enough to know each other properly for marriage. Hi and thanks for your reply. it says in the letter yes that esa and my other benefits cannot be taken in consideration as they are means tested. i posted the appendex from the ukba website just earlier and it says you can use benefits.. As for our relationship. there is no guildlines saying you have to know someone x amount of time before u marry or apply for a visa x amount of time after u marry. ONly evidence of genuine and subsisting relationship.. i have done this everything they ask. it states clearly u have to have meet in person. we have on 4 occasions. the ECO also says we where only together 7 weeks in all and at no time in any document was 7 weeks mentioned. IN all we spent 12 weeks in each others company. when not no less than 4/5 hOURS on skype/fb chatting by camera etc everyday without fail... We included 28 pages of skype alone with records. more than i assum they would ask.. Edited March 27, 2014 by r4b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhodie Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I think you need to scan the letter and post it. I am unable to find anything in the letter about refusal on financial grounds. But, others may understand better. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> I may be wrong here, and I am not sure what e cp 1 1 says, but I do not see anything in the letter that refers to your ability to support your wife. It just seems to have been refused on the grounds that you have not been in a relationship long enough to know each other properly for marriage. Hi and thanks for your reply. it says in the letter yes that esa and my other benefits cannot be taken in consideration as they are means tested. i posted the appendex from the ukba website just earlier and it says you can use benefits.. As for our relationship. there is no guildlines saying you have to know someone x amount of time before u marry or apply for a visa x amount of time after u marry. ONly evidence of genuine and subsisting relationship.. i have done this everything they ask. it states clearly u have to have meet in person. we have on 4 occasions. the ECO also says we where only together 7 weeks in all and at no time in any document was 7 weeks mentioned. IN all we spent 12 weeks in each others company. when not no less than 4/5 hOURS on skype/fb chatting by camera etc everyday without fail... We included 28 pages of skype alone with records. more than i assum they would ask.. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279661/Immigration_Rules_-_Appendix_FM.pdf I THINK IT APPEARS THE ECO HAS BEEN USING THE OLD GUILDLINES AND NOT THE NEW ONES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 I think you need to scan the letter and post it. I am unable to find anything in the letter about refusal on financial grounds. But, others may understand better. Good luck. your sponser receives 74 each week in dla .he also receives employment support allowance, child tax credit,child benefit and housing benefit however esa ,child tax credit, child benefit and hb are in come related benefits and as such are not premissible for inclusion in any financial year. caculations in these rules he does however receive 1o every 2 week from his childens mother wich is permissible income under these rules, whilst he says this income including all the a bove is 487.83 per week i am unabel to include esa, child tax credit, child benefit and hb in my calculations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhodie Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 (edited) OK, I see you posted that in a separate post. I would try to get your wife to scan the letter and email it so you can post it here in full. Will be a lot more use to the guys in the know. Good luck. Edited March 27, 2014 by rhodie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 JUST SO YOUS ALL KNOW GUYS IT APPEARS TO ME BY RESEARCH AND DETERMINATION THAT THE ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER IN BANGKOK IS STILL USING THE OLD GUIDELINES. CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG BUT THIS APPENDEX IS OLD AND A NEW ONE HAS BEEN DRAFTED IN 2013 https://www.gov.uk/g...Appendix_FM.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 OK, I see you posted that in a separate post. I would try to get your wife to scan the letter and email it so you can post it here in full. Will be a lot more use to the guys in the know. Good luck. yes this is the full copy she wrote from the letter. the eco has been using out of date guidelines and the evidence is in the refusal letter.. namely the paragraphs he quoted c p 1 1 or something.. new appendex dont have this. these are taken from OLD....... https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279661/Immigration_Rules_-_Appendix_FM.pdf and not NEW https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279482/maintenance.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wooloomooloo Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 r4b - take a step back and consider your next steps. You and your wife don't have long to mount an appeal. Reading between the lines of the refusal, I can see what the ECO is getting at given your circumstances. I can't comment on whether the judgement is correct as it's not my job. I should advise to seek urgent immigration advice as I'm not certain you would overturn this decision on your own. I've read much of Tony M's advice for over four years here and elsewhere and he might be a good place to start. Up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 r4b - take a step back and consider your next steps. You and your wife don't have long to mount an appeal. Reading between the lines of the refusal, I can see what the ECO is getting at given your circumstances. I can't comment on whether the judgement is correct as it's not my job. I should advise to seek urgent immigration advice as I'm not certain you would overturn this decision on your own. I've read much of Tony M's advice for over four years here and elsewhere and he might be a good place to start. Up to you. Thanks for you reply. its clear the EMO is using old rules for my visa refusal by the paragraph quotes and section quotes from appendex.. this is the old rules before the changes. he has entered these and stated clearly this as his reasoning for his refusal. So he in basically not fit to work as an eco if he can not go by the new rules.. now i would ask myself how many other people has had a refusal by this guy when the guidelines have changed... for me a very strong letter to the manager of the eco is in order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beano2274 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 be careful about your comments about ECO"s, they approve or disapprove a visa, and some of them do know Thaivisa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4b Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 be careful about your comments about ECO"s, they approve or disapprove a visa, and some of them do know Thaivisa. Hi point taken thank you for the advise. but im sure you can understand my frustration now finding out and KNOWING 100% THAT THE ECO HAS USED THE OLD GUIDELINES WHEN LOOKING AT MY WIFES VISA... £900 I PAID FOR SERVICE WHICH I EXTENSIVELY RESEARCHED NOT ONLY HERE BUT EVERY WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET. TO FIND OUT I HAVE BEEN DEALT A BLOW FOR SOMETHING I KNOW TO BE INCORRECT DOES MAKE YOU WONDER.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wooloomooloo Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 With due respect, r4b, you're not exactly clear on points of law either. Don't waste time arguing the toss. Get a move on and get specialist help. Up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now