I have no problem with that as long as it’s out of the 3 key areas I mentioned.
Even my gay neighbors from the 80’s and 90’ would want no part of today’s nonsense.
Only in your alternate reality, in real life no conviction means the perpetrator had a lot of money to spend on high priced lawyers, and to pay people off.
You can engage in as much filthy revisionist history as you want, but it doesn't change one thing, one iota.
I gave up on this conversation. None on the left wish to address the real issue. Not anti-trans which I don't see anyone here a part of. But pro woman meaning keeping locker rooms, women's sports and children apart from the "woke acceptance".
And of course if you disagree in the slightest with their wide open world of fully intact men showering with teenage girls you are the bigot. Liberals and Democrats of the year 2000 would have laughed at the idea this would become a hill their side would die on but here we are.
After playing around with it, i think you have hit the nail on the head, over or under thought, too complicated, no baseline/common rules or a combination of the lot!!!
Its constructive feedback, not a moan for moaning sake.
I do like the new look though
Recommended Posts