Jump to content

Netanyahu declares 'victory' in Gaza


webfact

Recommended Posts

Gaza conflict: Israeli PM Netanyahu says war was 'victory'

JERUSALEM: -- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the seven-week conflict in Gaza ended in "victory".


The Palestinian Islamist Hamas movement was "hit hard and got none of its demands," Mr Netanyahu said.

Hamas has also claimed the truce represents a victory for Gaza and held a large rally to celebrate it.

On Tuesday a ceasefire came into effect after 50 days of fierce fighting in which more than 2,200 people died, most of them Palestinians.

In a televised news conference, Mr Netanyahu said Hamas had been "hit hard" and threatened an even tougher response should there be so much as a "sprinkle" of rocket fire from Gaza.

He added that Israel "didn't agree to accept any of Hamas' demands".

On Wednesday, the UN's World Food Programme said one of its convoys had entered Gaza for the first time since 2007, carrying enough food to feed around 150,000 people for five days.

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-28955615

bbclogo.jpg
-- BBC 2014-08-28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 339
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It is a victory for Hammas in one important respect. They have reestablished themselves as an important player in the Middle East, especially now that the Muslim Brotherhood etc., have been marginalized. Importantly, going forward, they have inserted themselves into any process with Israel regarding the Palestinians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hamas was "hit hard and got none of its demands,". They lost leadership, decimated their rocket supply - which Egypt will not allow them to replenish - had their tunnels destroyed and lots of weapon and ammo dumps as well. Victory on many levels.

Tactical victory on many levels.

Strategical loss overall.

HAMAS is still in charge. Expect first cleaning up the seeds of discontent among Arab Palestinians. Consolidation of power over Gaza. Re-arming. Re-cruiting. Re-education. Re-digging. Re-opening the issues.

Strategically Israelis lost.

The World Public sympathy never was, is or will be for Israel.

The common belief that Jews are smart, devious, powerful - is a fallacy.

They are trying to win wearing white gloves against an unscrupulous, cruel, ruthless and fanatical enemy. Not a chance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a victory for Israel. Hamas tried pulling their PR BS by using their children as human shields but that didn't deter the Israelis. Good luck using the same trick again. The Israelis have shown they have the stomach for killing innocents if it means protecting their own citizens.

As for the rest of the world and the US. Well Obama never liked Netanyahu anyway so who cares? The black golf player is leaving in a couple of years and the next administration will deal with Israel differently. As for the 'protests' here in Thailand. If you look at the pictures of the 'mad crowds', you're right, they're mostly mad. With Osama beards. I doubt non Muslim Thais give a damn about what's happening.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the most important thing that Israel lost in the war is unquestioned support from the White House. Future presidents (of both parties) aren't going to forget how Israel treated the US Secretary of State--both in person and in the media.

Poppycock. Most politicians of both parties in America back Israel and they don't blame them for standing up to Kerry and Obama.

I'm not sure if this type of statement is indicative of naiveté or a blinkered perspective.

Whether or not most politicians of both parties in America back Israel is completely irrelevant to the bigger picture of how America is perceived on the international stage. Even if it was the UK PM who had acted this disrespectfully, there would be payback coming. Even in Tel Aviv they know this.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the most important thing that Israel lost in the war is unquestioned support from the White House. Future presidents (of both parties) aren't going to forget how Israel treated the US Secretary of State--both in person and in the media.

Poppycock. Most politicians of both parties in America back Israel and they don't blame them for standing up to Kerry and Obama.

I'm not sure if this type of statement is indicative of naiveté or a blinkered perspective.

Whether or not most politicians of both parties in America back Israel is completely irrelevant to the bigger picture of how America is perceived on the international stage. Even if it was the UK PM who had acted this disrespectfully, there would be payback coming. Even in Tel Aviv they know this.

As UG was trying to point out, in a little over 40 months Israel will no longer have to endure a US President that loathes them.

They have withstood much more, from far more responsible foes, than anything the Obama leadership (?) team can throw at them.

Kerry is a joke and will be gone at the same time.

Both of them are irrelevant to the long term security of Israel.

Edited by chuckd
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the most important thing that Israel lost in the war is unquestioned support from the White House. Future presidents (of both parties) aren't going to forget how Israel treated the US Secretary of State--both in person and in the media.

Poppycock. Most politicians of both parties in America back Israel and they don't blame them for standing up to Kerry and Obama.

I'm not sure if this type of statement is indicative of naiveté or a blinkered perspective.

It is indicative of knowing how the political system in America works. Obama is seen as the worst president since WW 2 and his foreign policy is seen as feckless. Very few Americans will blame Israel for standing up for themselves. If fact, it is seen as a positive.

OK, so it's both. laugh.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why all this Obama and Kerry bashing. I like 'em both. They're having to tip-toe in a field of broken glass which has been there for 60 years.

Nobody 'won' the mini-war in Gaza. Israel showed it was serious about coming down hard on punks tossing bombs over the fence. Israel continues blocking the exits north and east, and I don't blame them. Egypt continues blocking exits to most people and things on the south. It's lamentable that Gaza won't be allowed to have an airport or ship port, but again, it's understandable. Even with the blockades, there are bombs and bomb-making material coming in to Gaza, mostly via tunnels. With easier access, it's likely the destructive imports would increase. Israel is doing what it feels it must to do protect itself and its citizens. I would expect nothing less.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Netanyahu showing his true agenda; Do not concede to any demands, even the reasonable, legitimate and fair ones.

This is why peace talks always fail.

May be you can explain to me the "reasonable ' in demanding from Israel to open Egyptian border and to have full control of it??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Netanyahu showing his true agenda; Do not concede to any demands, even the reasonable, legitimate and fair ones.

This is why peace talks always fail.

May be you can explain to me the "reasonable ' in demanding from Israel to open Egyptian border and to have full control of it??

Did anyone say all of Hamas's demands were reasonable?

But that aside, an open border with Egypt sounds reasonable. Dual control would be more reasonable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...