Jump to content

Taliban might replicate IS success after western troop withdrawal: Expert


webfact

Recommended Posts

Taliban Might Replicate IS Success After Western Troop Withdrawal: Expert

WASHINGTON, October 28 (RIA Novosti) - The Taliban might repeat Islamic State (IS) accomplishment after the NATO force pullout unless the Afghan government learns Iraq's lessons, Bradley Moss, national security lawyer has told RIA Novosti.


"If the Afghans make the same mistakes that were made by the Iraqi Government after the US withdrawal in 2011, it would be rather easy to see the Taliban replicating in Afghanistan the success of ISIL in Iraq," Moss warned in the wake of the ongoing western troops pullout from the country.

The drug trade has not been eradicated and the central Afghan Government still has a lot to prove about its ability to effectively govern beyond Kabul, particularly in the rural areas, he explained.

Moss stressed that the continued drawdown of remaining Coalition Forces in Afghanistan serves as a stark reminder that the writing is on the wall for the Afghan Government.

"After 13 years of supported operations, the day is drawing closer and closer when the Afghan Army will have to largely handle the counter-offensive against the Taliban – as well as the stabilization of the country at large – without Western assistance," he explained.

"One can only hope that the extensive resources provided, as well as sacrifices made by the Coalition Forces, will not have been in vain," Moss stated.

Full story: http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20141028/194707803/Taliban-Might-Replicate-IS-Success-After-Western-Troop.html

-- RIA Novosti 2014-10-28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why, if the US and allies were going to have a campaign in Afghan, they didn't spray herbicide on those opium poppy fields and cut off the Taliban's cash flow.

It seems as if every time we engage someone we now do it with one hand tied behind our backs. It's either war or it isn't.

So which is it?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the US and their allies started the Irak invasion the late and famous German journalist Peter Scholl-Latour, a Middle East expert and longtime war reporter, predicted that the Islamism will be the winner.

He also said, you cannot win the war in Afghanistan by weapons against religion, partisans and old (square) culture, because not adopted to this kind of war. Just before dying (this year, ~90 years old) he told an Afghanistan panel of the Bundestag (German parliament) "The Afghanistan War is lost - we should admit it."

And some of his other remarcable words. Now he wouldn't leave Kabul without any protection, it got so dangerous. So you can guess how dangerous it is now to do a job there. The election was only a "ballot-fetishism", the slates are dominated by the war lords. The West with its troups didn't learn anything from the Russian fiasco. Leave the faite of Afghanistan to the Afghans. In a nutshell, forget the troups and NGOs.

My idea ... Wasted money and - more important - sacrifice of lives of so many innocent people for nothing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thing, withdraw the troops and all Western workers as soon as possible, and let them kill each other. Ever heard of the "far from my bed" phrase?

That is what Western governments should keep in mind, it is only their issue when the get involved.

The problem is, the muslim cult tentacles reach out to countries everywhere, and kill people in NYC, Oklahoma, UK, Ottawa, etc.... Troops WERE removed from Iraq, against the best military advice, and of course the U.S. rejected out of hand any idea of sending troops to Syria against Assad (red lines notwithstanding), but ISIS actually WANTS our troops over there, and carries out its beheadings of our citizens, and encourages lone wolves to act, as provocation to try and make that happen! So we should repeat this debacle in Afghanistan with the Taliban?

I would truly love to believe in what you say. It's hard to imagine a worse situation into which to introduce our serving men & women. But events have shown it's just not the way things work to think we can sit back and say it's "far from my bed". Does it have to actually be your own friend or relative who's beheaded or murdered before you consider the violence close to home???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having worked (and by extension, lived) in Afghanistan for a little over 10 years (from fall 2003 until now minus a 9 month break between contracts) I have not the slightest bit of hope for this country after we (the "west") leaves here. In fact, the (unofficial) betting pool has already been running for how long it will take the Taliban to take over (again) after the last of the western troops leave.

.............

Dear Kerry, thank you very much for your insight into the cruel reality of Afghan life and into the background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WASHINGTON, October 28 (RIA Novosti) - The Taliban might repeat Islamic State (IS) accomplishment after the NATO force pullout unless the Afghan government learns Iraq's lessons, Bradley Moss, national security lawyer has told RIA Novosti.

Perhaps this so called Security Expert, could tell the world how many of the AP and ANA are infact also members of the Taliban ?

What a clown.

Kerry D

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why, if the US and allies were going to have a campaign in Afghan, they didn't spray herbicide on those opium poppy fields and cut off the Taliban's cash flow.

It seems as if every time we engage someone we now do it with one hand tied behind our backs. It's either war or it isn't.

So which is it?

Since 2002 the US has invested US$7.5 billion on counter narcotics, with very minimal success. An extract from a report below.

"While eradication accounted for a significant component of US counter-narcotics strategy during the mid-2000s, the US-led coalition shifted away from it in recent years, owing to a conclusion that crop destruction drove farmers and those dependent on them into the hands of the Taliban".

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/30/afghan-opium-production-explodes-billions-spent-us-report

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, let them kill each other, but have extremely well defended green areas and refugee camps to accept the non-combatants, women and children.

Here's Afghanistan in the 1960's . . .

http://all-that-is-interesting.com/1960s-afghanistan#1

http://www.upworthy.com/afghanistan-in-the-1960s-prepare-to-be-very-very-surprised

<deleted> happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What puzzles me is that Saudi Arabia actually have 700 war planes at there disposal, so why dont they use there own planes?why have we sent 6 planes out there? totally futile operation, we need to learn from previous mistakes and get the hell out of there, the western world needs to stop fighting other peoples wars. It makes the country poorer and the warmongers richer, the whole thing stinks.

Edited by bigjules007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What puzzles me is that Saudi Arabia actually have 700 war planes at there disposal, so why dont they use there own planes?

why have we sent 6 planes out there?

the western world needs to stop fighting other peoples wars.

I believe you already know the answer to your first two questions, BigJules. Gulf Arab nations are simply clever enough to sit back and watch, playing a waiting game, knowing full well that the west will eventually step forward first and expend their lives and our hardware, letting strong regional players off the hook. All they have to do is be patient enough, knowing that leaders in our nations can't help ourselves and are compelled by some strange tractor beam of white man's burden to dive in and get involved in trying to solve out what others shy away from intentionally, for self preservation. Lobbing endless amounts of cash towards those projects is what they do because they are swimming in it, so it is no loss for them.

Living in ivory towers, nobody in their nations dies in their global game of chess played out in air conditioned palaces eating dates and burning the luxury grade al-lubbān while western troops on the ground do all the donkey work and are maimed as western economies are bled dry by the operations being bogged down in a quagmire of damage limitation. We've got to hand it to them, the Gulf nations are smart chess players.

Long term strategy, using proxies to do their dirty work for them, is what they do best. I see today that the FCO has essentially warned the British public that we are now at super high risk of terrorism everywhere in the world because of air strikes on ISIS. Many of our troops believed the operations in Afghanistan and Iraq were to keep us safe back at home. Today, the FCO says we're all now at the highest risk we've ever been.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pakistani intelligence (ISI) were / are using cash supplied by Arabs (I presume also aid monies from the West) to provide cash rewards for members of the Taliban & other terrorist networks in Afghanistan for killing ISAF forces, equivalent to more than a years’ income for each ISAF member killed. ISI officers also provide targeting info, safe haven, training, re-supplies etc etc.

After ISAF forces withdrawal has been completed, if the commitments are kept by the donors, someone around US$15 billion in civilian aid over the next four years; plus funding for the Afghan military, has been committed to assist with transitioning / rebuilding Afghanistan. Agreed at the Tokyo Conference on Afghanistan, URL below.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-18758148

When one reads books / reports by ex-serving military in Afghanistan they all say the Taliban are dedicated fighters and without overwhelming fire power would have been in a fair amount of strife. I understand Afghan military will still have access to US airpower, but what about meaningful medivac timelines for those injured?

Perhaps kerryd may like to provide some input of whether the non-Pashtun ethnic groups – 55% of the population – are represented in the Afghan security forces & government in any meaningful numbers. Is Afghanistan still heavily divided along ethnic lines with the resultant oppression by Pashtuns & the serious challenges for national cohesion?

Edited by simple1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Chief of Defence Staff General Sir Nick Houghton says "primary strategic purpose" in Afghanistan had been achieved of making UK streets safer" ~ BBC

According to the MI5 website, right now, the current threat level from interntional terrorism for Britain is - "severe", one notch below 'critical'.

If he wanted to show respect on rememberance sunday, he should have kept his mouth shut (IMO) rather than use this opportunity for spin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why, if the US and allies were going to have a campaign in Afghan, they didn't spray herbicide on those opium poppy fields and cut off the Taliban's cash flow.

It seems as if every time we engage someone we now do it with one hand tied behind our backs. It's either war or it isn't.

So which is it?

Wrong...Before the US invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban Government punished the grow of opium in the country, and also prostitution was punished. The Taliban Government was a very conservative Muslim regime. Too conservative sometimes. I agree, but opium, prostitution, crime, corruption, fraud, etc, etc, was what the US brought back to Afghanistan with the excuse to end with Al Queda and terrorism. After the US invasion, Al Queda and Taliban supported the opium trade and heroin export to finance the resistance and terrorism, but also westerners drug dealers got into the opium business, and many western companies in the corrupted "reconstruction business".

That's the legacy the US will leave to the Afghan people after 13 years of ocupation with the excuse to find Bin Laden. Anyway....all that waste of lives and money will be in vain.

The Taliban, like it or not, will regain control of is country. Sooner or later. I hope the US will learn some day to leave other cultures alone with its problems, and take care of his own people.

Edited by umbanda
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the legacy the US will leave to the Afghan people after 13 years of ocupation with the excuse to find Bin Laden.

Calling it an occupation is not how I'd define it.

The Taliban, like it or not, will regain control of is country.

It may regain control of Afghanistan, but to refer to Afghanistan as "its" country (if that was your intention) is a half truth.

A friend of mine even referred to them as a National Liberation Movement, something I don't believe is an accurate label.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why, if the US and allies were going to have a campaign in Afghan, they didn't spray herbicide on those opium poppy fields and cut off the Taliban's cash flow.

It seems as if every time we engage someone we now do it with one hand tied behind our backs. It's either war or it isn't.

So which is it?

Wrong...Before the US invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban Government punished the grow of opium in the country, and also prostitution was punished. The Taliban Government was a very conservative Muslim regime. Too conservative sometimes. I agree, but opium, prostitution, crime, corruption, fraud, etc, etc, was what the US brought back to Afghanistan with the excuse to end with Al Queda and terrorism. After the US invasion, Al Queda and Taliban supported the opium trade and heroin export to finance the resistance and terrorism, but also westerners drug dealers got into the opium business, and many western companies in the corrupted "reconstruction business".

That's the legacy the US will leave to the Afghan people after 13 years of ocupation with the excuse to find Bin Laden. Anyway....all that waste of lives and money will be in vain.

The Taliban, like it or not, will regain control of is country. Sooner or later. I hope the US will learn some day to leave other cultures alone with its problems, and take care of his own people.

The problem with Afghanistan is it's impossible to achieve your goal, the Russians who weren't tied by human rights legislation like us couldn't and had to withdraw, we supported the mujaheddin?? against the Russians and armed them did they then become the Taliban?

Edited by japsportscarmad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Russians who weren't tied by human rights legislation like us couldn't and had to withdraw

Yet that withdrawal was for reasons similar to ISAF withdrawing. Our popular narrative in Europe and the US is that the Russians were mauled so decisively that they fled with their tails between their legs, but that is fantasy and is what jihadis believe they managed. Rather, just as with ISAF today, it ended up as a stalemate situation. Militarily the Russians won continous battles and inflicted far more damage on their opponent than their opponents inflicted on the Russians, as did ISAF, but the overall 'point' of each war and the financial cost of it began to increasingly be questioned back home. It was hugely unpopular, and politicians could only ignore that up to a point, as has happened back here in Europe and the U.S

In this sense I agree with you that this is the problem with Afghanistan. It is so fiercely protective of the status quo in the culture, it has a bottomless pit of will power and fodder to keep on with no matter how long it takes and no matter how many 'martyrs' are shovelled forward in order to live up to something in its cultural mythology that it 'repels all comers' no matter how long it takes. It is a mythology that may end up with the country dragged into total destitution, but all they care about is the 'strength to repel' mythology. I believe that ISAF recognised there can be no 'total' victory there.

'If' the core point was to destroy al Qaeda camps, then they managed that (or at least kicked it down the road to re-appear in other parts of the world) and did that in a very short time, but then it got bogged down trying to reconstruct Afghanistan in its image. Opening a few girl's schools? I'm sure it was appreciate by girls, but 13 years and 19 billion pounds for a few token schools and building projects out in highly conservative areas?

Vladimir Putin, the wiley fox that he is, ultimately understood how to solve Chechnya. Instead of total overwhelming military strength from afar that only bleeds a nation dry each day, he poured resources into grooming a local young former militant then showered him with gifts, sports cars, palaces and all the bling he'd ever need, in return for him being - "our muslim strong man in the caucasus" who unleashes merciless dogs of war on any jihadists who want to combat Russia. Ramzan Kadyrov is that man, and thus far Putin's approach has worked. Kadyrov probably breaks every line of the geneva convention, but he wants to retain his goodies from Moscow and is willing to do absolutely anything to maintain his position.

It seems that for Putin, 'order' was his first priority for Chechnya.

For ISAF, a 'different' Afghanistan was their first priority, but eventually it switched to damage limitation instead.

I may be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...