Jump to content

U.S Social Security, an entitlement?


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

SS hasn't been a purely "pay it forward" system since the 1983 reforms of the Greenspan Commission. Those reforms raised the payroll tax more than was required to meet make benefits payments at the time in order to build up the SS Trust Fund in anticipation of the increased demand

Yes, it built up the Trust Fund -- but with what? More IOUs. But not real assets. Had those FICA taxes been used to buy gold, or Euro bonds -- yes, it would have something more than paper promises. But, no, Congress borrowed every surplus FICA tax dollar -- and used it to buy battleships. It's now morally obligated to repay -- and eventually Congress will agree on how that is to be done, being politically necessary vis-a-vis the voters. Anyway, the Forbes article was an excellent summary -- of a naked emperor.

“These balances are available to finance future benefit payments … only in a bookkeeping sense. They do not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits. Instead, they are claims on the Treasury that, when redeemed, will have to be financed by raising taxes, borrowing from the public, or reducing benefits, or other expenditures.”

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...