Jump to content

Why is Thailand such a success compared to the Philippines?


Recommended Posts

Posted

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Geography is a big part of it.

Thailand is the perfect base for Asean travel.

Flipland is a bunch of islands well into the sea!

Bali is an island and does well

Does well in what?

The Balinese (and Indonesians in general) have a much lower standard of living than Thais, even Isaan Thais.

Bali is tourist island does a lot better than any other Non Thai islands in SEA.

That Bali is overpopulated because there religion demands a lot children is another problem not related to the popularity (actually it makes it less popular).

Non-Thai island?....This thread is about Thailand!

Bali doesn't even beat most other Indonesian islands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indonesian_provinces_by_GRP_per_capita

I don't understand the rest of the waffle.

Posted

Ask again in 5 years.

Huh? In 5 years, there will be an even bigger gap. I can cite a number of reasons including overpopulation, chronic corruption, crime, etc. But if there was one thing that is preventing the Filipinos from prospering...I'd say it is the Catholic church. Sorry to say, but it seems that in every country in the world (outside of Italy) with a dominant Catholic religion, that country is mired in poverty and corruption. Even Italy has problems.

Like Luxembourg, France, Poland, Austria, Monaco, Andorra, Chile, Portugal, Malta. etc.?

  • Like 1
Posted

Thailand is lucky.

No, it's more than that.

Recent history doesn't explain it either.

Work ethic - as already mentioned - and the fact that the average Thai is more intelligent [especially the women] than the average Filipino.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think one reason is safety for foreign investors. Thailand is fairly gun free and safe. For a long time, potential Taiwanese and Japanese investors were being kidnapped in the P.R. After mainland China opened-up, there was no need to take the risks - physical and financial - involved in investing in the P.R.

Posted

I'll be interested to see where Thailand is in ten or fifteen years. As HeijoshinCool said, they got a big bump from the Vietnam war. The US poured money and technology into the country as Thailand allowed the US to use air bases. Later it brought in a lot of manufacturing. Thailand and the US have been friends and allies since just after WWII right up until about NOW.

The US isn't going to put up with this China alliance and has already pulled a lot of income away from Thailand since the coup. I don't expect Japan to put up with the China alliance either and the US and Japan are close.

If the US and Japan pull significant manufacturing out of Thailand and move it to Burma, Thailand will be hurting. The US and Japan already bought huge tracts of land in Yangon, and Japan promised to build a deep water port there. This was over Yingluck's behavior. Imagine what they think of the current government's moves.

Thailand has had it's Marcos. Thaksin and Yingluck robbed the country blind and left it deeply in debt and not just over the rice scheme. They at least temporarily destroyed the rice export business.

Thailand is slipping. It's stupidity, greed and corruption is catching up with its economy from rice to tourism. Next if it loses the US and Japan as Cambodia, Vietnam and Burma take business, it could slip a long way down. I'm not predicting anything, I just see the possibility.

As usual, in agreement. EXEPT: While Thaksin and sister "plundered the country", during the "plundering-process" , the poorest of the poor felt for the first time in their lives, that during the "Plundering-Phase" by Thaksin, some crumbs were falling off the table of corruption in their favor. Infrastructure: Roads were built, electrification of isolated villages. etc. etc. Unheard of before.

The impoverished Thai's (the red-shirts) have understood, that they will be ruled by some sort of Elite for the next 2 generations. But they will certainly prefer to be ruled by a corrupt Elite, that allows for some "crumbs" to fall off the table in their favor. They also know that there will be no "crumbs" falling off the table, as long as "the General" and his yellow-shirt- entourage sits at the table exclusively and with the sole purpose to cement the Feudalistic- Power-Structure that they prefer to call "Thainess".

Interesting times ahead. Cheers.

So you've managed to bring junta bashing into this topic.

But shows a lot of ignorance to what is going on, ask the farmers who have now been paid for their rice or the people of Issan who will benefit from the proposed rail link.

You might like to tell us about the "Crumbs" that the poor got from the Yingluck administration that have left them deeper in debt than ever before.

Posted

It's the Pinoy mentality that's putting the Philippines down. They generally prefer to be employees than become entrepreneurs. They usually don't like to take risks. Filipinos are good social beings... singers, dancers, English language speakers. Thai people are generally good in math, have better business acumen, and are not afraid to invest in business.

  • Like 2
Posted

-snip-

Flipland is a bunch of islands well into the sea!

So is Japan. thumbsup.gif

Japan has Japanese living in it though ;)

They also modernized a lot quicker than Thailand did and looted a lot of plunder after WW2, giving them a leg-up over other countries.

Posted

Of course it is not only one determining factor, as some people like to suppose, but rather a combination of many historical, cultural, social, economical, geographical and geopolitical factors.

Some of these factors are probably more crucial than others, but I think that it is, in the end, a matter of personal opinion to determine what these factors are.

It depends on the cultural background of the observer: an economist would probably disagree with a sociologist, an historian would still have another opinion and an anthropologist would perhaps call them all wrong.

Being the curious ignorant that I am, I personally think it has not to be undervalued the incidence of the Chinese migration in Thai society. The Thai elite, both in the private and the public sector, is mostly made by people of Chinese descent. In the last century there was, and there's still today, a huge economical force in Thai economy coming from China, both in terms of wealth and in terms of leadership. To give you a measure of it, 1 Thai over 7 is ethnically Chinese, or mixed with Chinese, and the majority of them reside in the urban and economical centers.

Even the largely famous, capillary Thai manufacturing sector, the small commerce, the familial and small businesses network, is mostly run by the Chinese-Thais, just like, say, the farming and the industrial workforce is mostly Thai.

Culturally and economically speaking, the leading head of the Thai emerging middle class have an important component of China in it. Government offices, Universities, multinational companies' high ranks, are full of wealthy and well educated Chinese-Thais.

I don't know very much of the Philippines, but I know in South East Asia only Malaysia (which is by the way another relatively successful economy) have a "Chinese factor" which is comparable to the Thai one (excluding countries which are basically China's satellites, such as Singapore and Hong Kong).

In the Philippines, only 1 person over 100 has a Chinese origin.

I'm not necessarily implying that the Chinese people have some sort of 'magic touch' for business, or that they are smarter, or so... but migration can be a very strong input for development and growth: Thailand had it, the Philippines didn't.

The Thai people were from Chinese lands in the south of China from the start. The later waves of Chinese immigration augmented the Thai stock so to speak. The homogenous effects it produced were a good catalyst for the future of Thailand.

However the migration to The Philippines was a different tale. You had a European force of mostly male men that migrated to an archipelago with an entirely foreign population racially. Over the centuries as this went on this wasn't a strong input for success and competing against the other Asian powers. So I'd add that the mingling of the blood didn't produce any 'hybrid-vigor' much beloved by cultural marxists, but in fact sowed the seeds of confusion, apathy and docility. The Catholic religion, another stranger to these people is something very remote and distant. It isn't as tangible than the Asian blend of Buddhism of Jainism etc.

In Argentina for example it's a different story. They are probably on course to be one of the great successes of the southern hemisphere, yet that is also Catholic...

Posted

Flip isles: raped by Spain and renamed their country after King Phillip, took away their surnames and replaced by Spanish ones.

Thailand: Never been conquered and has a written language.

Or maybe Flips focus too much on dancing and not enough on education and intellectual pursuits.

Posted (edited)

Vietnam war.

Yes, but the PI had Subic and Clark AFB, etc. Maybe the distribution of the bases in Thailand that made a difference.

Previously to that, the Japanese had bases (for a while) in both countries as well. The Philippines being more victimized, but put up a good Guerilla Warfare resistance. Unlike Thailand. There are many decendants (grandmother to my son) from that era.

Allied forces, as we know, were all over Burma, Malaysia, Philippines, and the South Pacific. There were positive benefits to these regions. Like the fact that they do not speak Japanese so well, nor pay homage to the Japanese Emperor. Not to mention the trade advantages/alliances and treaties that pretty much led to the Westernization of these regions.

As far as the Vietnam War....the bases in the Philippines were in direct support, and were just as active in their missions as the bases in Thailand. Also served as Rest and Recuperation area...same like here.

Edited by slipperylobster
Posted

It's all to do with the mentality of the people and IMHO nothing to do with the US.

Flippers don't have the work ethic of Thais. Considering most Flippers speak English you would think this was an advantage but it isn't.

Burma is over 50 years behind Thailand and Bangkok is a first world city. Manila isn't.

Even China has problems competing with Thailand in certain industries.

However Thailand has reached a plateau at the moment but once the politics are sorted out I see no reason for it not to move forward.

I know many Filipinos that will disagree with you , the people I know work really hard , one of the best people you can hire as crew on ships , the Filipino teachers I know working in Bangkok are not more lazy than the Thai teachers, thats for sure.

Yes they do have the work ethics in Phills , but they also struggle with poverty and corruption everywhere.

Most companies in Thailand are Chinese owned and as others have said the Chinese know how to do business.

One my visits I've found them to be a lazy bunch that are mostly only suitable as employees.

They are like poor people the World over. Instead of ramping up their game they cut back and eat recycled garbage called Pak Pak. Google it and puke.

How many Filipino multinationals are there - San Miguel?

Water used to be more expensive than Coke and Coke was more expensive than beer.

Why does every convenience store have guards with shotguns or automatic weapons. It's a cesspit.

  • Like 1
Posted

Ask again in 5 years.

Huh? In 5 years, there will be an even bigger gap. I can cite a number of reasons including overpopulation, chronic corruption, crime, etc. But if there was one thing that is preventing the Filipinos from prospering...I'd say it is the Catholic church. Sorry to say, but it seems that in every country in the world (outside of Italy) with a dominant Catholic religion, that country is mired in poverty and corruption. Even Italy has problems.

Like Luxembourg, France, Poland, Austria, Monaco, Andorra, Chile, Portugal, Malta. etc.?

I was thinking more along the lines of Mexico, Brazil, Columbia, Honduras, Venezuela....i.e., all of Latin America. Perhaps I should rephrase to say non-Anglo countries with a dominant Roman Catholic religion. Or do you think the PI and these other countries has prospered under the Vatican?

  • Like 1
Posted

I haven't visited PI in more than 20 years, but it was very dangerous back then and Thailand was/is not. I would have never even considered living in the Philippines and as soon as I got to Thailand, I knew this is where I wanted to stay.

  • Like 1
Posted

whistling.gif That's actually a silly question.

The fact is they are not.

In Thailand the data ......what they like to call "the economic indicators", are manipulated by an elite that are trying to control those indicators for their own interests.

Newspaper in Thailand print what this elite money group wants them to.

The business news in Thai news papers id full of "good news" to give a biased picture of how healthy the "Thai economy" is.

It's mostly BS they print, especially for the foreigners to read.

In Thailand, (as in other countries also) you need to keep the 80% rule in mind.

Note: The 80% rule is:

80% of everything you see. hear, or read is B------t.

rolleyes.gif

  • Like 1
Posted

Flip isles: raped by Spain and renamed their country after King Phillip, took away their surnames and replaced by Spanish ones.

Thailand: Never been conquered and has a written language.

Or maybe Flips focus too much on dancing and not enough on education and intellectual pursuits.

It's time for you to stop reading historical books made in Thailand cheesy.gif ;

They were always colonised ; by Khmer - explain me why there are so many Khmer castles in Issan ? - , by burma, by lao people ; and after in the centuries by portuguese, english and french Royal Navies ..

Always they have, they must sign treaty of alliance or peace treaty ...

For the thai government the naval Koh_Chang battle ( 1941 ) is a thai victory ... greta distorsion with the real facts...

and in the new books about history of Thailand all about Thaksin and his family doesn't exists....

About it's written language it's coming from sanscrit ( India ) and before that it was chinese language that only a very few people can read and write.

  • Like 2
Posted

Ask again in 5 years.

Huh? In 5 years, there will be an even bigger gap. I can cite a number of reasons including overpopulation, chronic corruption, crime, etc. But if there was one thing that is preventing the Filipinos from prospering...I'd say it is the Catholic church. Sorry to say, but it seems that in every country in the world (outside of Italy) with a dominant Catholic religion, that country is mired in poverty and corruption. Even Italy has problems.

Like Luxembourg, France, Poland, Austria, Monaco, Andorra, Chile, Portugal, Malta. etc.?

I was thinking more along the lines of Mexico, Brazil, Columbia, Honduras, Venezuela....i.e., all of Latin America. Perhaps I should rephrase to say non-Anglo countries with a dominant Roman Catholic religion. Or do you think the PI and these other countries has prospered under the Vatican?

No, I just don't think the Vatican has that much impact on the economy. There are plenty of non-Roman Catholic-majority countries in the world that are not particularly well-off. Blaming the Roman Catholic Church for the situation in the Philippines is specious, in my opinion.

The country was mostly Roman Catholic before Marcos when the Philippines was the third largest economy in East Asia (and 19th in the world). Their religion didn't seem to get in the way of their development then.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...